Just wanted to show some of the pics of the last time we saw J&A together. Both looking relaxed and happy. And is that one guy with them the same guy who was with Jake recently? What do you all think?
OT: according to this person who worked on the set of ‘the informers’, they finished filming in Buenos Aires on Sunday night. He says nothing specific about Austin.
There is a beautiful picture taken in a garden in Buenos Aires where the last scenes of the movie were filmed.
^Sorry, a brief correction. It says they finished filming Friday night. The post is from Sunday and it says ‘the night before last we finished filming’.
After a lot of scrutinizin' (but not too much, it was pretty evident to me), I concluded it was the same guy (at far left in the second shot). No doubt in my mind. :)
I love those pictures, just a couple going out shopping with their friends on a Friday night. And it does look as if they really are their friends as opposed to "just" Austins. Because the guy at the Staples center definitely is one of the Borders guys.
And isn't it oh-so-interesting?
Austin comes back home on Friday and from that day on we suddenly have sighting over sighting popping up of Jake spending time with Reese and the kids in SF. Hmmmm... Oh, those coincidences surrounding Reeke! They are too numerous to count.
I'm still waiting for the paparazzi pictures, btw. I mean, haven't we been told that the only reason that there were pics from Napa is because the paps read about Reeke being there on some obscure blog? And we know that Flynet already is in SF, they had the Rince pictures. I wonder why they were able to catch them back then and now - even though Reeke are supposedly snuggling on set - no one is able to get one single picture...
I doubt there will be pictures. After all, Reeke were being really discreet again. They didn't even spend time together at that aquarium, Jake left before Reese and the kids entered. Why the hell they would do that after having been courting the paparazzi for a good month is beyond me, but I'm sure someone will find some reason that makes either Reese look like the "Best Mom Ever!!" or Reeke like the "Best Couple Ever!!".
STB: The Jake and Reese sightings in SF didn't first appear on some obscure blog, it was on the Perez site first, hardly obscure. It was a Sunday I believe 11/11? The obscure blog mention was the next day 11/12 I believe. Flynet is already in SF as you have said and you know they check Perez. Popsugar and PITNB are also on SF, that's how they got the kissing pics, they were basically next door. And where on that RAD blog does it say that they were snuggling on set? They were with the kids in a parking garage, not on set.
The Jake/Reese sightings this time around have not appeared on any major blogs (RAD) doesn't count.
There was a delay in shooting the film due to weather according to IMDB, so I gather that instead of flying home to LA for those few days, she decided to arrange to have the kids spend a few days with her and Jake came along because he is on break also.
And I doubt that you will get pap pics of all of them since they took pains to avoid that reading that LJ. A picture of all 4 is a $$$ shot.
PS: Someone on the previous thread claimed that they couldn't read any othe entries on that LJ, just that one and that it was friends locked. Well I checked and it isn't and I had no problem reading the previous entries.
If the sightings are made up I don't think they would bring the kids into it and they would sound more romantic. These sightings make them sound like an old married couple.
Looking at these pictures you can see such a difference in Jake. Talk about being home. Austin has his apartment doesn't feel like him. Jake has his icebergs. Now we know that really home is when they are together.
This is the last thing I'm going to say about this:
?, check with one of your buddies first before you post. I think it was def456 who first mentioned that the snuggling in front of the kids (and yes it did say snuggling, read the sighting) was perfectly fine because the garage was one of the locations for shooting "Four Christmases". If you don't like that, discuss it with def456, not with us. And I thought they already had pics of the four of them together? Doesn't trick-or-treating count anymore?
I will never understand how people can look at these pictures and then look at Reeke pictures and not see how staged they are. I never get tired of seeing these pictures, especially the first one.
Emile Hirsch and Josh Brolin (pictured) are aligning themselves with yet another prestige project. The two, who are currently earning Oscar buzz for their roles in Into the Wild and No Country for Old Men, respectively, are in negotiations for Milk, the Gus Van Sant biopic starring Sean Penn as Harvey Milk, the former San Francisco city supervisor and gay-rights activist. Brolin is in talks to play Dan White, the elected official who assassinated Milk in 1978, while Hirsch is eyeing the role of street hustler-turned-Milk aide, Cleve Jones. James Franco (In the Valley of Elah), meanwhile, is gearing up to play Milk's longtime lover, Scott Smith. Milk, which is scheduled to begin shooting Jan. 21 in San Francisco, is being made by Groundswell Productions and will be released by Focus Features.
I am DEf456 and I'd like to set something straight since you find it alright to copy and paste my posts on this blog. I did not say anything, I simply copied and pasted the original bloggers post. I never said nor implied that they were snuggling in front of her children, because frankly I was not there and do not know. Others implied that they were sucking face in a parking garage with the kids around, I simply stated that if they read the original post about the sighting it never said that. Read what that person posted and take it for what it is, but don't add meaning to it and don't imply I said anything.
Also the person who blogged about filming being halted due to weather was clearly wrong, they posted this information while "Four Christmasses" was being filmed in the rain and there is video and photo evidence to support this, as there were futher filming sightings posted at several locations (GG bridge, Transamerica building, Twin Peaks, Trolly) all part of the locations and schedule that was provided by somebody in the know and by the extra casting sight on IMDB.
That's all I'm going to post about this and all I'm going to post on this blog. Please don't spin my blogs to support your opinions, and please don't use my posts to prove a point. As I have stated all alone I did and do not have first hand knowledge of what took place but the blogger seemed to know and there was to be a scene filmed in a parking garage in San Fran and a scene to be filmed in Twin Peaks, both public knowledge if you goto the extra's casting call.
Enough said. I'll stay out of your stuff and I'd like if you did the same for me.
STB: I seem to have hit a sore point, you are dissembling. YOU are the one that said that they were snuggling on set, check your comment, you never sourced your comment to DEF456, you just stated it as fact. They weren't filming that day (Friday) according to IMDB due to the lousey weather and I think filming will resume today. If you or DEF would have checked more you would have realized that the sighting with the kids had nothing to do with filming since the RAD sighting NEVER mentioned they were on set, most likely waiting for a valet to get their car. DEF was speculating, not a FACT.There is nothing wrong with snuggling, even in front of the kids. I'm sure they weren't traumitized, they have seen it before but Def sounds like a pearl clutcher like some here and need to justify 2 people being affectionate in front of the kids!!!
And no the paps DON'T have a picture of all of them. All they have is a picture of Jake in a gorilla suit carrying Deacon's mask and bag, Reese yelling at the paps and her friend running in the other direction with AVA, Deacon and her friends daughter, the paps weren't even able to get Reese with her kids. If you noticed the pics that were posted on US that you don't see the kids and her friends, just an irate Reese and a goofy Jake. You see more on the flynet video and you can see that they went into seperation mode: NO PICS OF THEM WITH THE KIDS. Ryan and Abby almost succeeded when Ryan opted to stay in the car with Deacon while Abby shopped with Ava. I'm sure Reese wasn't pleased and that's why IMO you will not see a happy group faimly pic of them this weekend.
STB: I seem to have hit a sore point, you are dissembling. YOU are the one that said that they were snuggling on set, check your comment, you never sourced your comment to DEF456, you just stated it as fact.
"Ann said
They are filming in several San Francisco locations, all planned months ago. On IMDB there is a blogg with most of the locations they will be at and one of them is a parking garage, the couple in the movie live in San Francisco and there is a scene in their buildinigs garage. ..."
Why are these notorious Jeese trolls monitoring this blog? I don't get it. Shouldn't they go to a Gyllenspoon blog/Jeese forum where they would be with sympathetic like-minded souls? I never go into those Jeese blogs/forums because I don't care about them and I wouldn't feel at home on them. These trolls make no sense whatsoever.
Wicked/Special--this is your blog and you can do as you will. But I'd use the deletion button for these wack jobs.
I don't know if it's been said yet (I don't have time to read all the comments now) but in the LiveJournal blog about the guy seeing Reeke at the aquarium in SF - he says Jake has a beard. All the NM sightings of him last week describe him as clean shaven. :)
This Def456. What's the point of all this anyway. She is in San Francisco filming scenes for a movie, one of the scenes filmed was in the couple's parking garage and there was a twin peaks location called for. I don't see anything wrong with showing affection in front of children, that was not my point. My point was that certain bloggers were taking a sighting in a parking garage and making it into some late night planned image to sex things up for Jake & Reese's image because of the TT parking garage story and they were spinning things to imply that Jake & Reese were now making out in front of her kids. I simply provided credible information and told them to go back and read the orginal blog which said nothing about making out.
And you are right, todate there are no photos of Jake with Reese's children, at least none that have made it into the public's hands. They were not photographed in the same frame on halloween and split apart when they learned that they were being filmed.
It sounds like they filmed 12/5 & 12/6, the pics and video on Flynet, but they halted after that due to weather. They hope to resume today. Friday and the weekend they were preping. It's not unussual that she, Jake and the kids were spotted in the locations that are going to be shot because I assume that she is staying near the set.
You're done posting on this blog? I find that hard to believe. You are NOT going to convert anyone on this blog nor are we going to convert anyone on the Jeese blogs. Why would you want to monitor a blog whose basic premise you don't agree with? Do you honestly think that people here are suddenly going to agree with you and think, "Oh stupid me. Jake/Reese are madly in love. How could I have been so stupid?" It's NOT going to happen here. Get a grip.
Def456: You really should go back to IHJ. Oh, but you make enemies, I mean waves, over there too don't you? Maybe you need to just give it up. Or start your own blog. Yeah, why don't you start your own blog? And we'll come visit YOU.
Mally, You are wrong. The one or 2 sightings of Jake during the 1st week of filming never mentioned that he had a beard. They spotted him at a gym with Toby and they said that he was big/bulky and the 2nd sighting was with Toby at a concert, I don't recall tehm mentioning it. The 3rd sighting was of Toby last week and it was Toby solo, not Jake and besides we all know that Jake is a chia pet, he grows hair overnight.
Def456 I'm not the person who copied and pasted my post on this blog, just thought I'd point that out and I don't copy and paste anyone on this boards blogs either.
Love these photos. Lakers 1 are my favorites, and for a long time the owl t-shirt pictures were 2nd, but after seeing the pure joy in Jake's face, the smiling one at the top became my #2 favorite. He gets an angelic glow around Austin. Lovely to look at.
Reeke fans have nowhere to go these days so are bothering WFT and OMG. Oh, and yes, I do think it's the same guy in the car that drove Jake.
Love these photos. Lakers 1 are my favorites, and for a long time the owl t-shirt pictures were 2nd, but after seeing the pure joy in Jake's face, the smiling one at the top became my #2 favorite. He gets an angelic glow around Austin. Lovely to look at.
Reeke fans have nowhere to go these days so are bothering WFT and OMG. Oh, and yes, I do think it's the same guy in the car that drove Jake.
I love these pics too - they really look so at ease and natural together. Not like the Jeese pics where, for the most part, he looks like he'd like to bolt at any moment, and gets an awkward backrub soothing. No need for that in J&A pics. I'd also like to point out that someone hand-delivered the latest "sighting" over to WFT personally, someone from the "shark pool" I would imagine. ;) After that, I'd think it would be fair game to pass around. There must have been a lack of a quorum over at the new GSD site too. So, we have no facts as to what happened for anyone this weekend. We know that R is in SF, we know that A ended filming in Uruguay on Friday. We know that J wasn't filming, but we don't know if that means he left. Just sayin'.
These lyrics are fabulous - I love how the singer or lyricist makes it plain in most every line that his feelings are "for a boy". Beautiful and romantic, very fitting for our boys.
I think you took it the wrong way or I send it the wrong way. That was to all those people who come over and troll it up and then go back and bash OMG somewhere else. OMG is like Jack Nicholson telling Tom Cruise (trolls) "You can't handle the truth"
NETB- remember that free podcast I was telling you about? Well this song was on podcast #74. Check it out- kexp.org and click the podcast link. They do a new one every 2 weeks and they're free. Hmm, KEXP should pay me for this! :)
I like Jake's smile in this, but I can also see how disturbed Austin is when he spots the pap/s.
He's licking his lips nervously in the one posted here, and sort of quickly turns sideways to look at something on a table. There's another one where he's looking directly at the camera, I think. (Been a while since I looked at these, so correct me if I'm wrong). The friends seem more amused by the novelty of being papped.
Isn't there one of Jake emerging from Borders looking upset a little later? Makes me wonder if Austin just loses it each time they're pictured. Which again makes me think they really are trying to hide something.
I think it upsets Jake greatly to see Austin distressed, so if Austin got upset that paps found them I can totally see why Jake came out of Borders agitated.
I'm not joining in the great SF debate either. I have to admit that three separate sightings makes it sound plausible but until/if we get pictures it goes in the Unproven file for me. Same as Jaustin sightings for the trolls.
I'm encouraged to think Austin may not have come home until after the weekend anyway. Finished filming on Friday, and post-filming parties on Saturday are possible.
^^ITA, Max. Also, the sightings haven't turned up on any major sites - just obscure blogs and boiler-room tactics, as Wicked noted. Could be true, but I'm reserving judgement. Makes ya wonder, if what we think isn't true, why it brings out the trolls in large numbers, as Wicked also said. Kind of amusing, really. But if we are wrong, I'll be one of the first to admit it. All I think people want to do is support J&A. :)
I remember reading on Just Jared the last time Jake was a Jar and was seen with a "mystery man" but the paps just got pics of Jake. The commenter said that almost every time Jake and Austin get papped it costs Jake. Why - he buys the pics of them. The comment said that is why you see Austin look upset or move quickly (they pointed out the coffee pics of last year) because he knows that is more money for Jake. So dinner out might have an extra grand or two added to the total for the night.
My nickels worth:
Why wouldn't the magazines out bid Jake? Personally, I think they are waiting for the big money shot of him with Austin, rather than them just hanging out. Paps know that Jake buys the pics, and that he is a guaranteed buyer vs. a maybe from the mags. So they go with where the guaranteed money is.
That's allright, then do that, instead of spending such copious amount of time trashing Jake or Reese or whoever else seems to break your beliefs. I think the reason you get 'trolls' is because you have absolutely NO issue trashing Jake for about anything he does based on speculations and gossip words rather hard to prove. Of course fans who care and have some level of respect for him find that highly unfair, and are not going to ignore.
Stubborn, the only snuggling Reese did on set was with Vince while shooting. Noone ever said she and Jake were snuggling on set, don't know where you got that from. Funny you all turn such prudes about 'snuggling', it's unlikely they were reenacting a scene from 91/2 weeks in front of the kids, jeez.
Also, since J&R or their management, went to the trouble of making a big splash with the relationship in magazines and blogs with Halloween, Rome, Napa, and Mile High Club, why pull back now? Especially since we've seen pics of R&A out with the children, and they children appearing comfortable. No, there's nothing wrong with showing some affection in front of kids, especially in a long-standing relationship. While things like this should be handled delicately in the beginning, kids are resilient and will adjust in time. There's no problem seeing Jake with the kids now, I would think. Why fall back on keeping things private now? Laying down the gauntlet - people can handle the truth, it's lies and smokescreens we can't handle. If it's not true, we can all move on.
And Proof? Stop lying and spreading misinformation. I, and very few here, have ever trashed Jake or Reese. While we may not agree with everything we see, read and hear about them, that hardly qualifies as trashing.
I can't wait to hear this song when I get home :) Oh, and I think the driving friend is the shorter Borders guy; I think he's also the guy in hjulia's Pebbles pic so a long-term Austin friend.
I don't know why any non-Jaustins come here - as broadwayfan said, we aren't about to recant, whatever the alleged sighting involves.
Sorry Spesh, that was me again at 1:15, before you make a Run for the Border! ;) Proof, in your elite group of fans who admire and respect J, we're at the top of that list, his unique fans, I'd be willing to bet. :)
Netb, you are hardly at the top of Jake's fans list, or Austin's for that matter. Don't fool yourself. You have done nothing for him, other than destroy his relationship with Austin.
And how is it that you respect Jake btw, please explain? I am lying? How so? the blog entries are here for everyone to see.
The guy with Jake is definitely the same one. I love this pics! So sweet I never Thought I could feel this way for a boy I love the title, What does it mean for you? It seems so romantic and sexy .... I ask for language issues but to know your opinion! Thanks
Proof, I truly doubt very much you know ANYTHING about Jake and his relationship with Austin, so please stop pretending you do. I'm quite sure you know nothing about whether they talk to each other or not. No one here does (although we like them both), and I doubt you do either.
ST, forgot to say what a lovely picture that is of the garden in Buenos Aires. Helps make up for those pics of Mickey Rourke! Man, that guy needs to lay off the plastic surgery.
I used to have picture of Mickey in his heyday up on the wall as part of a project I was working on - Man, I know boxing took its toll on him, but I agree Wicked, he definitely got sucker punched by the plastic surgeon.
OT: Lainey idiocy. Here she talks about how even though Hayden can't act and his latest film is another stinker, he and Rachel are so hot together and they have steamy "palpable" chemistry that you can just feel. The woman is delusional: http://www.laineygossip.com/Hayden_Christensen_Rachel_Bilson_in_Vegas_for_Jumper_movie_trailer_premiere_.aspx
Lainey really is every publicists wet dream, isn't she?
Now Hayden and Rachel are a genuine couple, too? It's a wonder she's able to admit that Cruise and Travolta are gay. But I bet you if they were younger and hotter, they'd also be 100% straight, all according to the many sources Lainey has. You know, like Perez and stars PR people...
What exactly did she dream about Jake, Wicked? I never read it and I don't really want to wade through all of her ramblings just to find it.
Sorry guys, according to Proof, apparently I'm single-handedly responsible for destroying the relationship between Jake and Austin? Just think what I could do to Bush and Cheney! lol
I agree, too much plastic surgery for Mickey Rourke.
Anyway, Guisi-poo, to answer your question about today's song - to me, it's about a young man who has discovered the wonder and joy of falling in love, with a member of his own sex, and he's not ashamed. I transcribed the beutiful and joyful lyrics for you all to enjoy. :*
I Never Thought I Could Feel This Way For A Boy, by the Scotland Yard Gospel Choir:
I was far away from Masaccio, And frescos in the Brancacci Chapel,
I was thinking about you, boy, Ungodly thoughts, I know, but I’m not ashamed.
I was dreaming I was filming a picture, with you on an island there, Somewhere off the mainland, we were alone, we were getting some practice in.
I’m Sandro Boticelli, I’m torn between the old and new, Between the way I’ve always thought I should be, And the feelings that I have for you, for a boy. Well, who’d have thought, I could feel this way for a boy?
I never thought, I could feel this way for a boy, I never, never thought, I could feel this way for a boy.
What will all the other boys say? Will they laugh, will they run away? I only want to be loved by ev-ry-one, At the end of the day.
Now, is that so wrong?
I never thought, I could feel this way for a boy, I never, never thought I could feel this way for a boy.
I never, I never, I never thought I could feel this way for a boy, I never, never, never thought I could feel th is way for a boy.
Sorry guys, according to Proof, apparently I'm single-handedly responsible for destroying the relationship between Jake and Austin? Just think what I could do to Bush and Cheney! lol"
NETB, maybe you could help Hillary Clinton get elected. You should join her on an Oprah-like campaign and she'll have her party's nomination like that. (Or Edwards, if you're so inclined).
With Becks now the "face" of Emporio Armani underwear, TMZ did a retrospective on celebrity packages like TMZ does. "Marky Mark and his Funky Bunch" "Daniel Craig holds on to his 007." "Lance in his Pants etc. Jake? "Jake and his boys."
I'm not sure who I'm going to give my, heh, copious time and formidable support (who knew?) to in the coming election, but it will definitely be someone in the party that begins with a "D"! I'm leaning towards Mr. Obama, but I'm not sure. ;)
Special I am thrilled that "Milk" is finally scheduled for production. Quite a cast and Focus comes through again. I am curious as to who will direct this film. I would love to see someone like Bryan Singer an openly gay director get the opportunity.
Sort of OT for the current discussion (what is it anyway?) but I went to see I am not there and I was greatly disappointed. Perhaps I don't know enough about Dylan to fully grasp the movie but I thought it was a hell of a pretentious and boring movie.
I think I only liked Michelle Williams and Richard Gere, his scenes were the most bizarre and interesting. Christian Bale was unwatchable.
More on topic: the top pic is my 2nd to fav (1st being the owl one)
Finally home and please accept my most humble apologies but the following lonnnnngish post.
That Jake pic at the top in the main post is one I find totally irresistible. And to answer the question: yes I'm convinced "that" guy was the one we saw with Jake recently.
Great, great song and very à propos… but I have to admit I can't resist anything that sounds like Belle & Sebastian anyway. :)
Many thanks to St & BV for the Informers info. St, that guy's blog is so beautiful, even without these info I would find it a pleasure to visit.
My brief two cents about the recent troll invasions: First, even if ten pro-Jeese blogs were up tomorrow morning we would still get trolls as their main purpose is to stir and they found a true bonanza in the split that characterizes Jake's fandom. Second, even if ten pro-Jeese blogs were up tomorrow morning we would still get trolls as people seem incapable of heeding Special and Wicked's repeated warnings and advices to ignore them.
About the recent Jeese sightings: Personally I don't care if they're fabricated or real. Jake is in active bearding mode, that much is clear to me and nothing will change my mind about it.
Austin is truly the man of mystery lately.
I agree Special and I'm pessimistic about possible solutions to this mystery. Bearding is a nasty business, particularly when done with a A-lister like RW and all the reasons I can think of for Austin to accept such a situation are not exactly appealing.
Now back to our Out list. I copied it in a Word file to print and be able to read it at leisure and found out that Sir Ian is not on it!!! Quick let's repair this infamy!!!! And while you're dabbling in the stage world girls, why not add Spacey to our little repertoire? ;D
And here's one more addition: playwright Joe Orton, who was portrayed superbly by Gary Oldman in "Prick Up Your Ears" (another of Frears' great movies).
Thanks for your input on "I'm Not There" Zero. Would you believe I was just talking with my sister only a few minutes ago about going to see it? We both LOVE Cate Blanchett and I really want to see Heath again. Talking about our favorite hobo, has anybody seen Candy? I've read good things about this film here and there and it just occurred to me that it also features Abbie Cornish who came to my attention recently in circumstances you're only too familiar with… ;) ;)
I think that's it for the time being. Shit this post is really long (sigh)…
Dear Ted: Don’t you think the recent Ryan Phillippe and Abbie Cornish pictures with his kids put a new angle to the reason why Reese created the showmance with Jake? She wanted to be perceived as the one who moved on first and didn’t want to be seen as the victim. Mary New York City
Dear Nice Try: Southern sasser (privately, never publicly) Reese is far from a passive victim in all of these postdivorce doings, we assure you. General Witherspoon is more like it. And we suspect it’s not for the strategic reasons you propose, Mare, but good effort, fer sure!
Dear Ted: I have a request. Is there any way, maybe once per month, you could feature a Toothy Tile Thursday in which you choose about 10 questions from readers and answer those questions in one comprehensive, albeit coded, retort? By the way, I found a common thread among Shia LaBeouf, The Rock and Steven Weber. Bev Birmingham, Alabama
Dear Baiting for Toothy: I’ll think about, hon, not a bad idea at all. And what’s the common thread, dying to know?
Wow Gus van sant directing "MilK" he has a good resume. Nominated for an Oscar for "Good Will Hunting". Didnt win but of course we knew all the accolades would go to Matt and Ben for that great movie and well deserved. I loved the relationship between Will and Chuckie. Broke my heart when Will didnt answer that door at the end. "My Own Private Idaho" was a strange flick but has some very endearing moments. Fell in love with River Immediately. I was crushed when he died.
I am excited about the movie it has been talked about for a very long time and it is great that it is finally becoming a reality. I hope it is well done.
Once a day I do a google search on Jake while at work. Usually around lunch. News and then blogs. Today, the blog search popped up about 8 blogs, all empty, and all under a variation of the name smith/blogspot. Can't recall names now but like PeterSmith, Bobsmith etc. I suspect this is PR setting up accts for future "sightings". I then searched under Reese and 2 of the same empty blog names came up.
On a different topic, I sure wish that person who discovered the thread between the it's nots Ted referred to had said what it was. A real stumper. I have no clue. Toothy thursday's would make my day.
Frenchy, Kevin Spacey is not out; he is closeted and denies being gay.
My mistake: the list is titled "Famous Gay People", not Out Gay People. Of course I know Spacey is closeted and denies vigorously being gay, hence the wink at the end of my suggestion. :) Still think he should be on our list though. ;)
Southern sasser (privately, never publicly) Reese is far from a passive victim in all of these postdivorce doings, we assure you. General Witherspoon is more like it. And we suspect it’s not for the strategic reasons you propose, Mare, but good effort, fer sure!
I'd love to read those reasons spelled out "loud and clear" in a future column.
And God how I'd love to have a glimpse into Austin's motivations!
My Own Private Idaho" was a strange flick but has some very endearing moments. Fell in love with River Immediately. I was crushed when he died.
Tom I must have rewinded and re-watched that scene by the fire a hundred times. Idaho is truly a beautiful movie.
yeah I know Ted answered that question last week. But I'd love him to answer that question every week or so. I mean, we've been asking here and wondering for weeks and months if they were still together and no clue about it. So, if you ask me, I'd totally love frequent updates on Jaustin :)
"Bearding is a nasty business, particularly when done with a A-lister like RW and all the reasons I can think of for Austin to accept such a situation are not exactly appealing."
We're not talking for the sake of money or fame as the less appealing reasons are we?
Awesome song!
ReplyDeleteLove these pics, both do look so happy here. Just a night out together.
And yeah, I do think it is the same guy.
OT: according to this person who worked on the set of ‘the informers’, they finished filming in Buenos Aires on Sunday night. He says nothing specific about Austin.
ReplyDeleteThere is a beautiful picture taken in a garden in Buenos Aires where the last scenes of the movie were filmed.
http://bp0.blogger.com/_4P8HTT3rZFg/R1yURoEkO_I/AAAAAAAAALg/gV3QwXCoI7Q/s1600-h/DSCF4801.jpg
source:
http://vascoloco.blogspot.com/
^Sorry, a brief correction. It says they finished filming Friday night. The post is from Sunday and it says ‘the night before last we finished filming’.
ReplyDeleteBest. Pictures. Ever. :D
ReplyDeleteAfter a lot of scrutinizin' (but not too much, it was pretty evident to me), I concluded it was the same guy (at far left in the second shot). No doubt in my mind. :)
^^Now that's interesting, ST. Good reason to high-tail it somewhere. I love this song too. :)
ReplyDeleteAnyone want to put their name on 8:08's comments?
ReplyDeleteLoved the pics :)
ReplyDeleteAustin's black jeans/pants there remind me of the "ultra long" one Jake was wearing at the Letterman show.
And great song choice :)
I love those pictures, just a couple going out shopping with their friends on a Friday night.
ReplyDeleteAnd it does look as if they really are their friends as opposed to "just" Austins.
Because the guy at the Staples center definitely is one of the Borders guys.
And isn't it oh-so-interesting?
Austin comes back home on Friday and from that day on we suddenly have sighting over sighting popping up of Jake spending time with Reese and the kids in SF.
Hmmmm...
Oh, those coincidences surrounding Reeke! They are too numerous to count.
I'm still waiting for the paparazzi pictures, btw. I mean, haven't we been told that the only reason that there were pics from Napa is because the paps read about Reeke being there on some obscure blog?
And we know that Flynet already is in SF, they had the Rince pictures.
I wonder why they were able to catch them back then and now - even though Reeke are supposedly snuggling on set - no one is able to get one single picture...
If there are pictures they will be released tomorrow after they were sold to the tabloids.
ReplyDeleteIf Austin finished filming Friday night then I think he must have returned home during the weekend.
I love these pictures. They are so beautiful!
And the guy with Jake is definitely the same one.
Sorry, Spesh, I keep hitting the wrong button I guess. :)
ReplyDelete^Sorry, anon 8:41 was me.
ReplyDeleteI was 8:08, I don't know about the other post. :)
ReplyDeleteI doubt there will be pictures.
ReplyDeleteAfter all, Reeke were being really discreet again.
They didn't even spend time together at that aquarium, Jake left before Reese and the kids entered.
Why the hell they would do that after having been courting the paparazzi for a good month is beyond me, but I'm sure someone will find some reason that makes either Reese look like the "Best Mom Ever!!" or Reeke like the "Best Couple Ever!!".
STB: The Jake and Reese sightings in SF didn't first appear on some obscure blog, it was on the Perez site first, hardly obscure. It was a Sunday I believe 11/11? The obscure blog mention was the next day 11/12 I believe. Flynet is already in SF as you have said and you know they check Perez. Popsugar and PITNB are also on SF, that's how they got the kissing pics, they were basically next door. And where on that RAD blog does it say that they were snuggling on set? They were with the kids in a parking garage, not on set.
ReplyDeleteThe Jake/Reese sightings this time around have not appeared on any major blogs (RAD) doesn't count.
There was a delay in shooting the film due to weather according to IMDB, so I gather that instead of flying home to LA for those few days, she decided to arrange to have the kids spend a few days with her and Jake came along because he is on break also.
And I doubt that you will get pap pics of all of them since they took pains to avoid that reading that LJ. A picture of all 4 is a $$$ shot.
PS: Someone on the previous thread claimed that they couldn't read any othe entries on that LJ, just that one and that it was friends locked. Well I checked and it isn't and I had no problem reading the previous entries.
If the sightings are made up I don't think they would bring the kids into it and they would sound more romantic. These sightings make them sound like an old married couple.
I love the bookstore photos - Jake always looks so natural and relaxed when he's with Austin. Hope we see some new photos before the end of the year.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the Informers info and links, ST. Too bad there weren't any photos of the actors on the set. I'm still dying to see blond Austin.
Looking at these pictures you can see such a difference in Jake. Talk about being home. Austin has his apartment doesn't feel like him. Jake has his icebergs. Now we know that really home is when they are together.
ReplyDeleteThis is the last thing I'm going to say about this:
ReplyDelete?, check with one of your buddies first before you post. I think it was def456 who first mentioned that the snuggling in front of the kids (and yes it did say snuggling, read the sighting) was perfectly fine because the garage was one of the locations for shooting "Four Christmases".
If you don't like that, discuss it with def456, not with us.
And I thought they already had pics of the four of them together? Doesn't trick-or-treating count anymore?
OT: Interesting tidbit: James Franco is currently back at UCLA pursuing a BFA in creative writing.
ReplyDeleteI will never understand how people can look at these pictures and then look at Reeke pictures and not see how staged they are. I never get tired of seeing these pictures, especially the first one.
ReplyDeleteMore James Franco news:
ReplyDeleteEmile Hirsch and Josh Brolin (pictured) are aligning themselves with yet another prestige project. The two, who are currently earning Oscar buzz for their roles in Into the Wild and No Country for Old Men, respectively, are in negotiations for Milk, the Gus Van Sant biopic starring Sean Penn as Harvey Milk, the former San Francisco city supervisor and gay-rights activist. Brolin is in talks to play Dan White, the elected official who assassinated Milk in 1978, while Hirsch is eyeing the role of street hustler-turned-Milk aide, Cleve Jones. James Franco (In the Valley of Elah), meanwhile, is gearing up to play Milk's longtime lover, Scott Smith. Milk, which is scheduled to begin shooting Jan. 21 in San Francisco, is being made by Groundswell Productions and will be released by Focus Features.
Jake's grin says it all.
ReplyDeleteI am DEf456 and I'd like to set something straight since you find it alright to copy and paste my posts on this blog. I did not say anything, I simply copied and pasted the original bloggers post.
ReplyDeleteI never said nor implied that they were snuggling in front of her children, because frankly I was not there and do not know. Others implied that they were sucking face in a parking garage with the kids around, I simply stated that if they read the original post about the sighting it never said that. Read what that person posted and take it for what it is, but don't add meaning to it and don't imply I said anything.
Also the person who blogged about filming being halted due to weather was clearly wrong, they posted this information while "Four Christmasses" was being filmed in the rain and there is video and photo evidence to support this, as there were futher filming sightings posted at several locations (GG bridge, Transamerica building, Twin Peaks, Trolly) all part of the locations and schedule that was provided by somebody in the know and by the extra casting sight on IMDB.
That's all I'm going to post about this and all I'm going to post on this blog. Please don't spin my blogs to support your opinions, and please don't use my posts to prove a point. As I have stated all alone I did and do not have first hand knowledge of what took place but the blogger seemed to know and there was to be a scene filmed in a parking garage in San Fran and a scene to be filmed in Twin Peaks, both public knowledge if you goto the extra's casting call.
Enough said.
I'll stay out of your stuff and I'd like if you did the same for me.
STB: I seem to have hit a sore point, you are dissembling. YOU are the one that said that they were snuggling on set, check your comment, you never sourced your comment to DEF456, you just stated it as fact. They weren't filming that day (Friday) according to IMDB due to the lousey weather and I think filming will resume today. If you or DEF would have checked more you would have realized that the sighting with the kids had nothing to do with filming since the RAD sighting NEVER mentioned they were on set, most likely waiting for a valet to get their car. DEF was speculating, not a FACT.There is nothing wrong with snuggling, even in front of the kids. I'm sure they weren't traumitized, they have seen it before but Def sounds like a pearl clutcher like some here and need to justify 2 people being affectionate in front of the kids!!!
ReplyDeleteAnd no the paps DON'T have a picture of all of them. All they have is a picture of Jake in a gorilla suit carrying Deacon's mask and bag, Reese yelling at the paps and her friend running in the other direction with AVA, Deacon and her friends daughter, the paps weren't even able to get Reese with her kids. If you noticed the pics that were posted on US that you don't see the kids and her friends, just an irate Reese and a goofy Jake. You see more on the flynet video and you can see that they went into seperation mode: NO PICS OF THEM WITH THE KIDS. Ryan and Abby almost succeeded when Ryan opted to stay in the car with Deacon while Abby shopped with Ava. I'm sure Reese wasn't pleased and that's why IMO you will not see a happy group faimly pic of them this weekend.
STB: I seem to have hit a sore point, you are dissembling. YOU are the one that said that they were snuggling on set, check your comment, you never sourced your comment to DEF456, you just stated it as fact.
ReplyDelete"Ann said
They are filming in several San Francisco locations, all planned months ago. On IMDB there is a blogg with most of the locations they will be at and one of them is a parking garage, the couple in the movie live in San Francisco and there is a scene in their buildinigs garage. ..."
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4420911995963030061&postID=5806206799578407147&isPopup=true
Why are these notorious Jeese trolls monitoring this blog? I don't get it. Shouldn't they go to a Gyllenspoon blog/Jeese forum where they would be with sympathetic like-minded souls? I never go into those Jeese blogs/forums because I don't care about them and I wouldn't feel at home on them. These trolls make no sense whatsoever.
ReplyDeleteWicked/Special--this is your blog and you can do as you will. But I'd use the deletion button for these wack jobs.
I don't know if it's been said yet (I don't have time to read all the comments now) but in the LiveJournal blog about the guy seeing Reeke at the aquarium in SF - he says Jake has a beard. All the NM sightings of him last week describe him as clean shaven. :)
ReplyDeleteBroadway Why do they come? There's no truth to Jeese but they know there's truth to J&A and they can't stand it.
ReplyDeleteWhat I notice is that whenever pics that show the naturalness and ease between J&A are posted, the trolls come out in droves.
ReplyDeleteThe aquarium guy probably assumed he saw Jake, because he saw a bearded guy with a baseball cap. *rolls eyes* I don't think Jake was ever there.
ReplyDeleteThis Def456.
ReplyDeleteWhat's the point of all this anyway. She is in San Francisco filming scenes for a movie, one of the scenes filmed was in the couple's parking garage and there was a twin peaks location called for.
I don't see anything wrong with showing affection in front of children, that was not my point.
My point was that certain bloggers were taking a sighting in a parking garage and making it into some late night planned image to sex things up for Jake & Reese's image because of the TT parking garage story and they were spinning things to imply that Jake & Reese were now making out in front of her kids. I simply provided credible information and told them to go back and read the orginal blog which said nothing about making out.
And you are right, todate there are no photos of Jake with Reese's children, at least none that have made it into the public's hands.
They were not photographed in the same frame on halloween and split apart when they learned that they were being filmed.
I am done posting on this blog I promise.
Here is the thread on IMDB talking about the delays due to weather:
ReplyDeletewww.imdb.com/title/++0369436/board/thread/88004455?d=91590850+p=2#91590850
It sounds like they filmed 12/5 & 12/6, the pics and video on Flynet, but they halted after that due to weather. They hope to resume today. Friday and the weekend they were preping. It's not unussual that she, Jake and the kids were spotted in the locations that are going to be shot because I assume that she is staying near the set.
I am done posting on this blog I promise.
ReplyDeleteYou said that @ 9:56 too.
You're done posting on this blog? I find that hard to believe. You are NOT going to convert anyone on this blog nor are we going to convert anyone on the Jeese blogs. Why would you want to monitor a blog whose basic premise you don't agree with? Do you honestly think that people here are suddenly going to agree with you and think, "Oh stupid me. Jake/Reese are madly in love. How could I have been so stupid?" It's NOT going to happen here. Get a grip.
ReplyDeleteDef456: You really should go back to IHJ. Oh, but you make enemies, I mean waves, over there too don't you? Maybe you need to just give it up. Or start your own blog. Yeah, why don't you start your own blog? And we'll come visit YOU.
ReplyDeleteMally, where did they say Jake is clean shaven? I must have missed that. I'm surprised at myself. You know how anti-beardy-beard I am!
ReplyDeleteMally, You are wrong. The one or 2 sightings of Jake during the 1st week of filming never mentioned that he had a beard. They spotted him at a gym with Toby and they said that he was big/bulky and the 2nd sighting was with Toby at a concert, I don't recall tehm mentioning it. The 3rd sighting was of Toby last week and it was Toby solo, not Jake and besides we all know that Jake is a chia pet, he grows hair overnight.
ReplyDeleteDef456
ReplyDeleteI'm not the person who copied and pasted my post on this blog, just thought I'd point that out and I don't copy and paste anyone on this boards blogs either.
you brought me into this, don't forget that.
Love these photos. Lakers 1 are my favorites, and for a long time the owl t-shirt pictures were 2nd, but after seeing the pure joy in Jake's face, the smiling one at the top became my #2 favorite. He gets an angelic glow around Austin. Lovely to look at.
ReplyDeleteReeke fans have nowhere to go these days so are bothering WFT and OMG. Oh, and yes, I do think it's the same guy in the car that drove Jake.
Love these photos. Lakers 1 are my favorites, and for a long time the owl t-shirt pictures were 2nd, but after seeing the pure joy in Jake's face, the smiling one at the top became my #2 favorite. He gets an angelic glow around Austin. Lovely to look at.
ReplyDeleteReeke fans have nowhere to go these days so are bothering WFT and OMG. Oh, and yes, I do think it's the same guy in the car that drove Jake.
I love these pics too - they really look so at ease and natural together. Not like the Jeese pics where, for the most part, he looks like he'd like to bolt at any moment, and gets an awkward backrub soothing. No need for that in J&A pics. I'd also like to point out that someone hand-delivered the latest "sighting" over to WFT personally, someone from the "shark pool" I would imagine. ;) After that, I'd think it would be fair game to pass around. There must have been a lack of a quorum over at the new GSD site too. So, we have no facts as to what happened for anyone this weekend. We know that R is in SF, we know that A ended filming in Uruguay on Friday. We know that J wasn't filming, but we don't know if that means he left. Just sayin'.
ReplyDeleteThese lyrics are fabulous - I love how the singer or lyricist makes it plain in most every line that his feelings are "for a boy". Beautiful and romantic, very fitting for our boys.
OMG is like Jack Nicholson in "A Few Good Men."
ReplyDelete"You can't handle the truth"
Jesssaying
ReplyDeleteWhy do you care what OMG posters think?
.
ReplyDeleteWho's that --
ReplyDeleteI think you took it the wrong way or I send it the wrong way. That was to all those people who come over and troll it up and then go back and bash OMG somewhere else. OMG is like Jack Nicholson telling Tom Cruise (trolls) "You can't handle the truth"
Jesssaying
ReplyDeleteSorry! Too much troll posts, too little time :)
NETB- remember that free podcast I was telling you about? Well this song was on podcast #74. Check it out- kexp.org and click the podcast link. They do a new one every 2 weeks and they're free. Hmm, KEXP should pay me for this! :)
ReplyDeleteThanks, Wicked - this one is incredibly, absolutely beautiful.
ReplyDeleteNETB- I think I'm gonna download this whole record. I just downloaded this song for today. I need more downloads @ eMusic!
ReplyDeleteI like Jake's smile in this, but I can also see how disturbed Austin is when he spots the pap/s.
ReplyDeleteHe's licking his lips nervously in the one posted here, and sort of quickly turns sideways to look at something on a table. There's another one where he's looking directly at the camera, I think. (Been a while since I looked at these, so correct me if I'm wrong). The friends seem more amused by the novelty of being papped.
Isn't there one of Jake emerging from Borders looking upset a little later? Makes me wonder if Austin just loses it each time they're pictured. Which again makes me think they really are trying to hide something.
I think it upsets Jake greatly to see Austin distressed, so if Austin got upset that paps found them I can totally see why Jake came out of Borders agitated.
ReplyDeleteI'm not joining in the great SF debate either. I have to admit that three separate sightings makes it sound plausible but until/if we get pictures it goes in the Unproven file for me. Same as Jaustin sightings for the trolls.
ReplyDeleteI'm encouraged to think Austin may not have come home until after the weekend anyway. Finished filming on Friday, and post-filming parties on Saturday are possible.
^^ITA, Max. Also, the sightings haven't turned up on any major sites - just obscure blogs and boiler-room tactics, as Wicked noted. Could be true, but I'm reserving judgement. Makes ya wonder, if what we think isn't true, why it brings out the trolls in large numbers, as Wicked also said. Kind of amusing, really. But if we are wrong, I'll be one of the first to admit it. All I think people want to do is support J&A. :)
ReplyDeleteI remember reading on Just Jared the last time Jake was a Jar and was seen with a "mystery man" but the paps just got pics of Jake. The commenter said that almost every time Jake and Austin get papped it costs Jake. Why - he buys the pics of them. The comment said that is why you see Austin look upset or move quickly (they pointed out the coffee pics of last year) because he knows that is more money for Jake. So dinner out might have an extra grand or two added to the total for the night.
ReplyDeleteMy nickels worth:
Why wouldn't the magazines out bid Jake? Personally, I think they are waiting for the big money shot of him with Austin, rather than them just hanging out. Paps know that Jake buys the pics, and that he is a guaranteed buyer vs. a maybe from the mags. So they go with where the guaranteed money is.
Take if for what its worth.
All I think people want to do is support J&A
ReplyDeleteThat's allright, then do that, instead of spending such copious amount of time trashing Jake or Reese or whoever else seems to break your beliefs.
I think the reason you get 'trolls' is because you have absolutely NO issue trashing Jake for about anything he does based on speculations and gossip words rather hard to prove. Of course fans who care and have some level of respect for him find that highly unfair, and are not going to ignore.
Stubborn, the only snuggling Reese did on set was with Vince while shooting. Noone ever said she and Jake were snuggling on set, don't know where you got that from.
Funny you all turn such prudes about 'snuggling', it's unlikely they were reenacting a scene from 91/2 weeks in front of the kids, jeez.
Also, since J&R or their management, went to the trouble of making a big splash with the relationship in magazines and blogs with Halloween, Rome, Napa, and Mile High Club, why pull back now? Especially since we've seen pics of R&A out with the children, and they children appearing comfortable. No, there's nothing wrong with showing some affection in front of kids, especially in a long-standing relationship. While things like this should be handled delicately in the beginning, kids are resilient and will adjust in time. There's no problem seeing Jake with the kids now, I would think. Why fall back on keeping things private now? Laying down the gauntlet - people can handle the truth, it's lies and smokescreens we can't handle. If it's not true, we can all move on.
ReplyDeleteI don't think we've seen these:
ReplyDeleteInformers article1 (translated)
Informers article2
Thanks BV!
ReplyDeleteSpecial K,
ReplyDeleteI guess that would kinda work for the coffee pics, because Austin was definately running then...
And Proof? Stop lying and spreading misinformation. I, and very few here, have ever trashed Jake or Reese. While we may not agree with everything we see, read and hear about them, that hardly qualifies as trashing.
ReplyDeleteI can't wait to hear this song when I get home :) Oh, and I think the driving friend is the shorter Borders guy; I think he's also the guy in hjulia's Pebbles pic so a long-term Austin friend.
ReplyDeleteI don't know why any non-Jaustins come here - as broadwayfan said, we aren't about to recant, whatever the alleged sighting involves.
Sorry Spesh, that was me again at 1:15, before you make a Run for the Border! ;) Proof, in your elite group of fans who admire and respect J, we're at the top of that list, his unique fans, I'd be willing to bet. :)
ReplyDeleteNoone ever said she and Jake were snuggling on set, don't know where you got that from.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was because there was speculation that the parking garage might have been a location for Four Christmases.
Thanks BV. All those pictures and still no Austin :-(.
ReplyDeleteAustin is truly the man of mystery lately.
ReplyDeleteNetb, you are hardly at the top of Jake's fans list, or Austin's for that matter. Don't fool yourself. You have done nothing for him, other than destroy his relationship with Austin.
ReplyDeleteAnd how is it that you respect Jake btw, please explain? I am lying? How so? the blog entries are here for everyone to see.
Rather conspicuously absent, I'd say. :)
ReplyDeleteSorry if my posts come off a little bit as "Explain the phone calls so we can all get out of here!" I don't mean them to be. See y'all later.
The guy with Jake is definitely the same one. I love this pics! So sweet
ReplyDeleteI never Thought I could feel this way for a boy
I love the title, What does it mean for you? It seems so romantic and sexy .... I ask for language issues but to know your opinion! Thanks
Sorry: not for language issues! :) it's clear
ReplyDeleteGuisi, I think you should do a J&A video to this song. :)
ReplyDeleteOh yes wicked! I promise: new pic, new video! ^______^
ReplyDeleteProof, I truly doubt very much you know ANYTHING about Jake and his relationship with Austin, so please stop pretending you do. I'm quite sure you know nothing about whether they talk to each other or not. No one here does (although we like them both), and I doubt you do either.
ReplyDeleteOh yes wicked! I promise: new pic, new video! ^______^
ReplyDeleteCan't wait for it Giusi! :* :*
No time to post right now but just by its title I feel I'm going to love the song you're playing right now. Will be back tonight. Ta-ta!
Frenchy, you will looove it!
ReplyDeletePerez mentions Jake and Austin
ReplyDeleteI would like to see a new video too giusi.
ReplyDeleteThanks Perez fan. What a funny coincidence that it involves one of the actors from FNL, and someone I've kind of wondered about to boot.
ST, forgot to say what a lovely picture that is of the garden in Buenos Aires. Helps make up for those pics of Mickey Rourke! Man, that guy needs to lay off the plastic surgery.
ReplyDeleteI used to have picture of Mickey in his heyday up on the wall as part of a project I was working on - Man, I know boxing took its toll on him, but I agree Wicked, he definitely got sucker punched by the plastic surgeon.
ReplyDeleteOT: Lainey idiocy. Here she talks about how even though Hayden can't act and his latest film is another stinker, he and Rachel are so hot together and they have steamy "palpable" chemistry that you can just feel. The woman is delusional: http://www.laineygossip.com/Hayden_Christensen_Rachel_Bilson_in_Vegas_for_Jumper_movie_trailer_premiere_.aspx
ReplyDeleteBWF, if you want to find out exactly how delusional Lainey is, read her dream about Jake. That says it ALL! Hayden Christensen too, huh?
ReplyDeleteLainey really is every publicists wet dream, isn't she?
ReplyDeleteNow Hayden and Rachel are a genuine couple, too?
It's a wonder she's able to admit that Cruise and Travolta are gay. But I bet you if they were younger and hotter, they'd also be 100% straight, all according to the many sources Lainey has. You know, like Perez and stars PR people...
What exactly did she dream about Jake, Wicked? I never read it and I don't really want to wade through all of her ramblings just to find it.
Sorry guys, according to Proof, apparently I'm single-handedly responsible for destroying the relationship between Jake and Austin? Just think what I could do to Bush and Cheney! lol
ReplyDeleteI agree, too much plastic surgery for Mickey Rourke.
Anyway, Guisi-poo, to answer your question about today's song - to me, it's about a young man who has discovered the wonder and joy of falling in love, with a member of his own sex, and he's not ashamed. I transcribed the beutiful and joyful lyrics for you all to enjoy. :*
I Never Thought I Could Feel This Way For A Boy, by the Scotland Yard Gospel Choir:
I was far away from Masaccio,
And frescos in the Brancacci Chapel,
I was thinking about you, boy,
Ungodly thoughts, I know, but I’m not ashamed.
I was dreaming I was filming a picture, with you on an island there,
Somewhere off the mainland, we were alone, we were getting some practice in.
I’m Sandro Boticelli, I’m torn between the old and new,
Between the way I’ve always thought I should be,
And the feelings that I have for you, for a boy.
Well, who’d have thought,
I could feel this way for a boy?
I never thought, I could feel this way for a boy,
I never, never thought, I could feel this way for a boy.
What will all the other boys say?
Will they laugh, will they run away?
I only want to be loved by ev-ry-one,
At the end of the day.
Now, is that so wrong?
I never thought, I could feel this way for a boy,
I never, never thought I could feel this way for a boy.
I never, I never, I never thought I could feel this way for a boy,
I never, never, never thought I could feel th is way for a boy.
From WFT - Lainey thinks that Austin is gay?
ReplyDeleteFeb 12 2006 - Sophia is dating Austin
Feb 28 2006 - Sophia's "next object of affection is gayer than glitter"
Sorry guys, according to Proof, apparently I'm single-handedly responsible for destroying the relationship between Jake and Austin? Just think what I could do to Bush and Cheney! lol"
ReplyDeleteNETB, maybe you could help Hillary Clinton get elected. You should join her on an Oprah-like campaign and she'll have her party's nomination like that. (Or Edwards, if you're so inclined).
With Becks now the "face" of Emporio Armani underwear, TMZ did a retrospective on celebrity packages like TMZ does. "Marky Mark and his Funky Bunch" "Daniel Craig holds on to his 007." "Lance in his Pants etc. Jake? "Jake and his boys."
ReplyDeletegossip girl, ok you and I know nothing right? That does not stop you from talking as if you did so why should stop me?
ReplyDeleteThough, I know what I know and I know it is certainly more than you'll ever do. Eat it.
Drugs are bad.
ReplyDeletePinky, TMZ has had that for a looong time, it is hardly new. I did not know that Armani sold padded underwear?
ReplyDeleteWho'sthat, maybe next step is you get off them?
ReplyDeleteHi BF,
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure who I'm going to give my, heh, copious time and formidable support (who knew?) to in the coming election, but it will definitely be someone in the party that begins with a "D"! I'm leaning towards Mr. Obama, but I'm not sure. ;)
Special I am thrilled that "Milk" is finally scheduled for production. Quite a cast and Focus comes through again. I am curious as to who will direct this film. I would love to see someone like Bryan Singer an openly gay director get the opportunity.
ReplyDeleteSort of OT for the current discussion (what is it anyway?) but I went to see I am not there and I was greatly disappointed. Perhaps I don't know enough about Dylan to fully grasp the movie but I thought it was a hell of a pretentious and boring movie.
ReplyDeleteI think I only liked Michelle Williams and Richard Gere, his scenes were the most bizarre and interesting. Christian Bale was unwatchable.
More on topic: the top pic is my 2nd to fav (1st being the owl one)
Yay NETB! You found the lyrics. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteStubborn, here's Lainey's dream. Scroll down and number 3 is Jake.
Tom, Gus Van Zant is directing "Milk."
ReplyDeleteI'm very excited by the cast.
Proof, I think you need to increase the dosage on your meds.
ReplyDeleteLuni improvide doctor, that's great.
ReplyDeleteOT: James Franco acting very stoned and strange during an interview with MTV News: http://perezhilton.com/?p=10262
ReplyDeleteTom, Gus Van Sant is slated to direct Milk, so your wish has come true.
ReplyDeleteFinally home and please accept my most humble apologies but the following lonnnnngish post.
ReplyDeleteThat Jake pic at the top in the main post is one I find totally irresistible. And to answer the question: yes I'm convinced "that" guy was the one we saw with Jake recently.
Great, great song and very à propos… but I have to admit I can't resist anything that sounds like Belle & Sebastian anyway. :)
Many thanks to St & BV for the Informers info.
St, that guy's blog is so beautiful, even without these info I would find it a pleasure to visit.
My brief two cents about the recent troll invasions:
First, even if ten pro-Jeese blogs were up tomorrow morning we would still get trolls as their main purpose is to stir and they found a true bonanza in the split that characterizes Jake's fandom.
Second, even if ten pro-Jeese blogs were up tomorrow morning we would still get trolls as people seem incapable of heeding Special and Wicked's repeated warnings and advices to ignore them.
About the recent Jeese sightings: Personally I don't care if they're fabricated or real. Jake is in active bearding mode, that much is clear to me and nothing will change my mind about it.
Austin is truly the man of mystery lately.
I agree Special and I'm pessimistic about possible solutions to this mystery. Bearding is a nasty business, particularly when done with a A-lister like RW and all the reasons I can think of for Austin to accept such a situation are not exactly appealing.
Now back to our Out list. I copied it in a Word file to print and be able to read it at leisure and found out that Sir Ian is not on it!!! Quick let's repair this infamy!!!!
And while you're dabbling in the stage world girls, why not add Spacey to our little repertoire? ;D
And here's one more addition: playwright Joe Orton, who was portrayed superbly by Gary Oldman in "Prick Up Your Ears" (another of Frears' great movies).
Thanks for your input on "I'm Not There" Zero. Would you believe I was just talking with my sister only a few minutes ago about going to see it? We both LOVE Cate Blanchett and I really want to see Heath again. Talking about our favorite hobo, has anybody seen Candy? I've read good things about this film here and there and it just occurred to me that it also features Abbie Cornish who came to my attention recently in circumstances you're only too familiar with… ;) ;)
I think that's it for the time being. Shit this post is really long (sigh)…
New Ted
ReplyDeleteDear Ted:
Don’t you think the recent Ryan Phillippe and Abbie Cornish pictures with his kids put a new angle to the reason why Reese created the showmance with Jake? She wanted to be perceived as the one who moved on first and didn’t want to be seen as the victim.
Mary
New York City
Dear Nice Try:
Southern sasser (privately, never publicly) Reese is far from a passive victim in all of these postdivorce doings, we assure you. General Witherspoon is more like it. And we suspect it’s not for the strategic reasons you propose, Mare, but good effort, fer sure!
Dear Ted:
I have a request. Is there any way, maybe once per month, you could feature a Toothy Tile Thursday in which you choose about 10 questions from readers and answer those questions in one comprehensive, albeit coded, retort? By the way, I found a common thread among Shia LaBeouf, The Rock and Steven Weber.
Bev
Birmingham, Alabama
Dear Baiting for Toothy:
I’ll think about, hon, not a bad idea at all. And what’s the common thread, dying to know?
I’ll think about, hon, not a bad idea at all. And what’s the common thread, dying to know?
ReplyDeleteif Ted asked me, I would like to know about Austin. Austin and Jake, if they're still together, a weekly update on their relationship.
Wow Gus van sant directing "MilK" he has a good resume. Nominated for an Oscar for "Good Will Hunting". Didnt win but of course we knew all the accolades would go to Matt and Ben for that great movie and well deserved. I loved the relationship between Will and Chuckie. Broke my heart when Will didnt answer that door at the end.
ReplyDelete"My Own Private Idaho" was a strange flick but has some very endearing moments. Fell in love with River Immediately. I was crushed when he died.
I am excited about the movie it has been talked about for a very long time and it is great that it is finally becoming a reality. I hope it is well done.
I’ll think about, hon, not a bad idea at all. And what’s the common thread, dying to know?
ReplyDeleteif Ted asked me, I would like to know about Austin. Austin and Jake, if they're still together, a weekly update on their relationship."
Ted answered this last week. Yes, Austin is still in the picture and Ted finds Austin's actions to be the least understandable given the bearding.
Jake named #3 cleanest male celebrity
ReplyDeleteOnce a day I do a google search on Jake while at work. Usually around lunch. News and then blogs. Today, the blog search popped up about 8 blogs, all empty, and all under a variation of the name smith/blogspot. Can't recall names now but like PeterSmith, Bobsmith etc. I suspect this is PR setting up accts for future "sightings". I then searched under Reese and 2 of the same empty blog names came up.
ReplyDeleteOn a different topic, I sure wish that person who discovered the thread between the it's nots Ted referred to had said what it was. A real stumper. I have no clue. Toothy thursday's would make my day.
Frenchy, Kevin Spacey is not out; he is closeted and denies being gay.
ReplyDeleteMy mistake: the list is titled "Famous Gay People", not Out Gay People. Of course I know Spacey is closeted and denies vigorously being gay, hence the wink at the end of my suggestion. :) Still think he should be on our list though. ;)
Southern sasser (privately, never publicly) Reese is far from a passive victim in all of these postdivorce doings, we assure you. General Witherspoon is more like it. And we suspect it’s not for the strategic reasons you propose, Mare, but good effort, fer sure!
I'd love to read those reasons spelled out "loud and clear" in a future column.
And God how I'd love to have a glimpse into Austin's motivations!
My Own Private Idaho" was a strange flick but has some very endearing moments. Fell in love with River Immediately. I was crushed when he died.
Tom I must have rewinded and re-watched that scene by the fire a hundred times. Idaho is truly a beautiful movie.
broadwayfan,
ReplyDeleteyeah I know Ted answered that question last week. But I'd love him to answer that question every week or so. I mean, we've been asking here and wondering for weeks and months if they were still together and no clue about it. So, if you ask me, I'd totally love frequent updates on Jaustin :)
Now that I'm home I can finally really listen to the song, it's great, and thanks for posting the lyrics netb.
ReplyDeleteM, that's very curious.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, Bob Smith was the fictitious name used by neontz (sp?) in her notorious Ennis/Jack/Bob Smith (don't ask) slash.
On a different topic, I sure wish that person who discovered the thread between the it's nots Ted referred to had said what it was.
ReplyDeleteThey all played a gay character... I think. Please those in the know confirm.
Thanks for your input on "I'm Not There" Zero. Would you believe I was just talking with my sister only a few minutes ago about going to see it?
ReplyDeleteHi Frenchy, hope you get to go see it, let me know what your opinion. Kate is cool, she totally looks like a young Bob Dylan in the movie.
broadwayfan said:
ReplyDeleteBy the way, Bob Smith was the fictitious name used by neontz (sp?) in her notorious Ennis/Jack/Bob Smith (don't ask) slash.
bwf, I think it might have been Bob White (from the story Green Eyes). I think... :)
I'm still loving the combination of this song and this pics, so much :)
ReplyDelete*Interesting*, m.
ITA Cinthya, with feelings too. It's like he's erased now.
M, I got those Smith blog links in my Google alerts for Jake yesterday.
ReplyDelete"Bearding is a nasty business, particularly when done with a A-lister like RW and all the reasons I can think of for Austin to accept such a situation are not exactly appealing."
ReplyDeleteWe're not talking for the sake of money or fame as the less appealing reasons are we?
"You have done nothing for him, other than destroy his relationship with Austin.
ReplyDeleteWhat? By talking about the rumors? If they were just friends I don't think that would stop them been seen together.