As the director of A Jihad for Love -- the world's first documentary to take a close look at Islam and homosexuality -- I am coming out as a Muslim man. My gay identity is secondary. Queer cinema is filled with stories of gays and lesbians revealing their sexuality, but my film is about people revealing their religion. With this film, the story of a 1,428-year-old religion is told by its most unlikely storytellers -- gay and lesbian Muslims.
Making this film and finding subjects who would be willing to share their stories with me was a "jihad" (struggle) in itself. In many of the cases it took me years to convince the subjects to participate, and I had to build relationships of mutual trust with them. What made it easier and certainly worth the challenge was that I was a Muslim like my subjects and we had much in common because of the backgrounds we came from. The entire process took six years of my life -- and these six years I cherish dearly for everything they taught me, not just about my own Islam but of the universal jihad, or struggle, to belong.
This film tries to construct the first real and comprehensive image of these unlikely creatures -- to be P.C., gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and queer Muslims -- and it is forcing many audiences to realize that these terms are a Western construct. Let me be clear: None of these categories means anything to many of my friends living in Cairo or Islamabad. If anything, the languages they speak -- Farsi, Arabic, Urdu, Punjabi, and Bengali -- have very few words of affirmation to describe the "odd" and "unnatural" behaviors, so to speak, that we indulge in. The cinematic representation of these complex identities therefore has come with many of the challenges of almost developing a new language.
It is a little-known fact that a sexual revolution of immense proportions came to the earliest Muslims, some 1,300 years before the West had even "thunk" it. This promise of equal gender rights and, unlike in the Bible, the stress on sex as not just reproductive but also enjoyable within the confines of marriage have all but been lost in the rhetoric spewing from loudspeakers perched on masjids (mosques) in Riyadh, Marrakech, and Islamabad. The same Islam that has for centuries not only tolerated but also openly celebrated homosexuality is today used to justify a state-sanctioned program against gay men in Egypt -- America's "enlightened" friend in the Middle East.
When in New York I often wonder how the lives of the subjects in this film would strike the consciousness of, for example, a Chelsea boy. Traveling to more than 10 countries with the film in the last few months has made me wonder about the absence of religion within "gay" lives. Clearly, spirituality can provide a kind of freedom. But it is also clear that for too many of us religion has not remained an option.
For the last six years, I have found myself immersed in the souls and spirits of the people who have shared their lives and their most private moments with my camera. Sometimes when I look at the footage of the gay Iranian refugees who have almost no material or spiritual support or the gay man who was tortured in an Egyptian prison for two years, I feel a tremendous disconnect. Growing up in worlds not very dissimilar to theirs, I know I understand and can empathize -- but knowing that I sit in America or in Europe working in the film world, I feel a sense of tremendous emptiness. This disconnect is similar to what a filmmaker feels when real people and real relationships turn into two-dimensional characters in a movie.
Sometimes in these worlds, traveling with my American Jewish producer and others, I feel we could be at the edge of some kind of revolution within Islam. As a Muslim, I know that this could be my jihad. But then the disconnects come and haunt me at night. Yet whenever the gay imam in the film, Muhsin, or the Egyptian refugee, Mazen, join us, the dots all seem to connect very well.
For any filmmaker who sets out to make a work that is intensely personal, the process is emotionally overwhelming. As a gay Muslim myself, I had a sense of shared struggle and shared pain with all of the subjects. While the camera was on (I was the primary camera operator) there was always an exchange of emotion between me and them. It was my hope that our mutual histories, cultures, and struggles would translate to the screen. I cannot think of another way of working when you are examining a community where the silence has been so loud and so overwhelming.
I never sought government permission in any of the countries where I filmed because I knew it would not have been granted. What was always foremost in my mind was the safety of these beautiful human beings, these devout Muslims whose lives I was documenting. I took extreme precautions to make sure that the tapes I shot were always safe. I would always record "tourist-like" footage at the beginning and end of a tape, and I would always store the tapes in my check-in baggage, with a prayer. Security staff at airports in fundamentalist regimes (the United States being a good example at this time) are not the friendliest people. I did have a difficult time in some countries because filming such profound human stories is hard for anyone, but at the same time I knew that I was filming while I was essentially there as a tourist. The countries that were easiest to film in were Turkey and of course India, my home country. In both these nations, which have significant Muslim populations (India has the second-largest Muslim population in the world, after Indonesia, and Turkey is 99% Muslim), the attitudes toward homosexuality are definitely more open than in others, and people accept the idea that there is a spectrum of human sexuality.
One personal challenge in making this film was to keep my deep respect for and belief in my faith paramount. Sharing some of the stories of condemnation, of isolation, of pain, would make it easy to issue a blanket critique of Islam. I knew that as a Muslim I could not allow myself to fall into the trap of being an apologist for my faith, joining the bandwagon of post-9/11 Islamophobes. I knew that I had to be a defender of the faith as a Muslim filmmaker and at the same time engage in a critique of what I knew was wrong in orthodox Islam's condemnation of homosexuality. I have always said that I made this film with a Muslim lens, as a Muslim filmmaker who also happens to be gay. Too many films about Islam right now are made by Western, non-Muslim filmmakers, which while commendable is also problematic -- in a world that now largely perceives Islam as a problematic monolith. Currently our religion is under attack from within (from an extremist fringe) and from without (by governments and media only focusing on the violence). Islam needs us to step out as Muslim artists and take back the discussion of our faith.
Our last battles of acceptance remain to be fought on the front lines of religion. With our "jihad for love" we bring Islam out of the closet.
Source: Advocate.com
Posted yesterday by aal7-1
ReplyDeleteTalking with Jake the other day...I can tell you he's a regular guy.
Nice as can be!
As is the rest of the cast and crew for that matter on the set of Nailed.
If anyone is out of hand, it's the "Hollywood Moms" stuffing their FAT faces!!!
Constantly begging for little sally to be on camera.
There’s your DIVA’s
link
^^^ There's more:
ReplyDeleteJessica said in a recent radio interview that there is no truth to the rumours about Jake being a diva on set.
Wow, I am just amazed by this post. Fascinating. He is right, for too long, not just in Islam, but many religions, Christianity too, have had their basic tenets skewed and taken out of context to suit a few extremist views, and not just about sexuality, but in many ways. Everyone should be able to have religion and spirituality in their lives if they choose to. I don't think there is one belief that is the so-called only one or right way, there are many. And certainly, never used to exclude or hurt people. To me, all the world's religions have a lot in common, they're all different ways of looking at the same thing. Great music today too. I hope we get to see film. Thanks! :)
ReplyDeleteWonderful post, Wicked.
ReplyDeleteI have little patience for religious nonsense and have been constantly amazed by how many well educated people would buy into such crap, which obviously were mis-interpreted or manipulated by men who use Islam or Christianity as excuse for personal gain. Suppressing women, sexual minorities, etc.
Being gay in Islamic states is like... being double minority.
Jessica said in a recent radio interview that there is no truth to the rumours about Jake being a diva on set.
ReplyDeleteIs there an audio link to this radio interview? Does anybody even know which radio station it was allegedly on? Not saying it didn't happen but I'd like to hear it in context.
Support gay kisses on As the World Turns
ReplyDeleteAmerican Family Association is taking action against ATWT airing a gay kiss between gay characters Luke and Noah. We need to support them for airing this. Call!
Emmy Categories for JFC
ReplyDeleteThis is who HBO is submitting for consideration for Emmy nominations.
ReplyDelete"JOHN FROM CINCINNATI"
Lead Actors: Bruce Greenwood, Brian Van Holt, Austin Nichols,
How great is that to see.
American Family Association is taking action against ATWT airing a gay kiss between gay characters Luke and Noah.
ReplyDeleteP&G, who produce the show, have set up a line in response to the AFA's push.
Call P&G to register your support of Luke and Noah: 1-800-331-3774
I found it so interesting that Sharma referred to coming out as a Muslim, rather than as a gay man. It really reflects how there are so many things we can feel we have to hide and come out about, sexuality is only one of them.
ReplyDeleteJust called about the Luke and Noah kiss on As the World Turns. Guys, seriously, call! All you have to do is press numbers. It takes less than a minute. I've never seen the show, but I definitely support a soap having a gay storyline that shows the same physical affection between gay characters that would be shown between straight characters.
Wouldn't it be great if Austin got nominated for an Emmy?
Thanks for this post today. I haven't had time to read the whole post yet, but I'm looking forward to it; I always find it interesting to hear about how other cultures deal with sex and identity. I hadn't heard of this film either.
ReplyDeleteThat is great news about HBO putting forward Austin's name, although realistically it would take a miracle for him to get a nomimation. Not only are you dealing with a canceled show that a lot of people didn't seem, the Emmys are notorious for generally sticking to the same old shows, stars, etc.
There is a little bit of a silver lining to the Emmy's Destiny -- HBO consistently leads the way in nominations. So you never know. No doubt that JFC will get a least one nom.
ReplyDeleteAnd you know that HBO will have a big Emmy party. : )
Finally getting a chance to finish reading the post while grabbing lunch. What a deeply moving and personal story.
What struck to me was how he planned his tapes, taping tourist friendly things at the beginning and end, and then saying prayer as he packed them. Relying on his faith, the same faith, in its orthodox practice, is condemning who is his, to protect his message.
A Jihad for Love banned in Singapore
ReplyDeleteWhen will it come to the US or Europe?
Resource list from A Jihad for Love's official site
ReplyDeleteAlso, the film was screened at the Toronto International Film Festival
Really great post today.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad that Sharma is not falling into the trap of just promoting/defending the biased views of others who have no real idea of the struggles of his people or the issue itself It definitely takes more courage to go directly to the source and gain a more personal and truthful perspective – whatever that may be. Interesting too that Sharma himself realized that he was somewhat distant from the issue emotionally at times although it was obviously very important to him personally. I would really like to see this film.
Great music today too btw.
How Islam helped one man in his struggle with same-sex attraction
ReplyDeleteInteresting that he admits that the feelings never went away, but he is able to sublimate them. Uh oh, maybe HE is CSP!
Even more people who failed in their attempt to use faith to help them get rid of same-sex attraction
ReplyDeleteSo many people are told by their faith traditions that they must choose between religion and sexuality. So many faiths have this idea that if become the best adherent possible of Religion X, these same-sex desires will just go away. And therein lies the rub. When the desires don't go away, the faith tradition says it's because you aren't doing a good enough job practicing the faith. People get caught in a vicious cycle they don't know how to get out of. They don't want to give up their faith and they can't change their sexuality.
ReplyDeleteThe Story of John Paulk, former leader in Focus on the Family and Exodus
ReplyDeleteOn September 19, 2000 while on a speaking tour, Paulk was identified drinking and flirting at Mr. P's, a Washington, D.C. gay bar, giving his name as "John Clint," one he had used in his days as a hustler in Ohio. A patron recognized him and contacted Wayne Besen, an employee of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay political action organization. When Besen arrived at the bar forty minutes later and confronted "John Clint", he denied that he was in fact John Paulk. Upon exiting the bar, Paulk's picture was taken as documentation that he had been in the bar. When confronted by Besen about the incident and the photographs, Paulk admitted being in the bar, but stated that he didn’t know it was a gay bar and had simply stopped in for a moment to use the restroom. However, eyewitnesses reported that Paulk stayed for more than an hour, flirted with other men, and when questioned about his sexuality, said he was gay (see Besen's book Anything But Straight; see also [11]).
Paulk was called back to Focus on the Family headquarters and was questioned by Dr. James Dobson. At first Paulk reportedly evaded a direct answer about the incident; however he later confessed that he had been in the bar for the purpose of flirting. Paulk was placed on probation, and was chaperoned on future speaking engagements to ensure that he had "support" in the event that he needed it. Dobson also removed Paulk from the Board Chair position of Exodus International. He remained on the board under probationary status only and was not allowed to attend meetings or vote.[citation needed]
An Exodus press release soon followed:
"John's actions represent a serious lapse in sound judgment. His decision to enter a gay establishment for any reason opens him up to all kinds of speculation by both other Exodus leaders and also the gay community." [12]
Al-Fatiha is a great organization for gay, lesbian and bisexual Muslims.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.al-fatiha.org/
Special, you are right about HBO. Unfortunately I'm just in one of those post-Reeke, don't get your hopes up frame of mind today. Maybe I need some new glasses for spring. :-)
ReplyDeleteDestiny
ReplyDeleteI always carry a pair and a spare, if you need to borrow one.
Thanks for this post - I'm very interested in seeing this film.
ReplyDeleteNice to see that Austin's name was submitted for emmy consideration. I'm not expecting anything to come of it, but as Special said, HBO will throw a party. :)
It would be great if JFC gets at least one nomination.
I don't want to use my nice avatar for this post. Brave guy, but what's with the equivalence? Does he really think the US authorities would have taken his films and exposed the subjects? Is that disingenuous? I hope so.
ReplyDeleteI'm with winterbird on religion.
There was a shocking tv programme on here recently about transsexuals (or, as it emerged in many cases, "transsexuals") in Iran who were offered sex change operations as that condition is deemed to be more societally acceptable than homosexuality. Only the results post-op weren't happy transgender women, but beautiful, sad and severely mutilated young men.
^ young gay men that should say, since that's all that was "wrong" with them to start with.
ReplyDeleteSouthworth gets support after coming out
ReplyDeleteExodus leader admits there is no such thing as an ex-gay!
ReplyDeletei've never seen so many links!
ReplyDeleteHillary endorsed by NC governor, who said she "made Rocky Balboa look like a pansy." Gay community upset, but are we being too sensitive?
ReplyDeleteYet another link
Great post W. Religion and Homosexuality is such and sensitive subject for me. Whether Islam, Hindu, Christian or Jewish I really believe it is about the person you are not your sexuality. I dont think God has the same hang ups about sex that people do. Can you imagine God being angry about love. I can't.
ReplyDeleteI made the phone call in support of Luke and Noah.
Austin will thank his long term partner when he receives his Emmy.
Probably Exodus had to admit that there is no such thing as an ex-gay because so many of their ex-gay poster children keep coming out and getting busted in gay bars!
ReplyDeleteFor me, the word "pansy" is not a loaded word. But maybe to others in the gay community, it is.
"I dont think God has the same hang ups about sex that people do. Can you imagine God being angry about love. I can't."
ReplyDeleteTrue, true, true Tom. ITA.
I love to see all the links today! I'm a web designer so naturally I love HTML. You guys are learning HTML...cool!! (applauding the room)
Ok...off to make my call for Luke and Noah. I don't even watch soap operas but I think this is important. Why cant we seeing ALL couples in love showing affection for one another. Whats the big deal?
"That Word" the governor used, I do have a problem with. The definition of it belittles a person's identity. I doubt he'd use slurs when talking about a female a person of another race. But as with all words, it's how it's used, and in this case he's obviously using it to belittle. It should be a flower in a garden, and nothing more. I really have a problem with people in powerful and influential positions not being more careful with the words they choose and making offhanded insensitive and bigoted remarks. It's one thing for your ordinary Joe to say it, it's another for someone who is held to a higher standard. But sometimes these words are so ingrained in the vernacular, people can used them accidentally. Someday, I hope, they will be phased out, much like racial slurs have become unacceptable. :)
ReplyDeleteI agree with Tom also, especially since God created all of us. It's people who have the problem with love.
I'm going to call about Luke and Noah too! :)
Nice to come home to so many interesting links to read and the loan of Special's glasses. And Tom, I love what you wrote about God.
ReplyDeleteI don't watch soaps either, but I made my call.
I agree with NETB about the use of the word pansy in this situation. If it was a gay person or gay-friendly person using it in a different context I wouldn't be bothered. As to whether Hilary should have said something, I think it is hard in that situation to rebuke someone, though she could have found a gentle way to say something. The real problem with Hilary is this comes on top of a lot of other transgressions, like her constant reference to Obama making his so-called elitist remarks in a closed room in San Francisco--she always made sure to say it happened in San Francisco. And as some bloggers have pointed out, she has a problem using the word gay, and an even bigger one using the word lesbian, even during the debates on Logo. Finally, she's never said anything about gay community in a speech for the masses, like Obama did in his speech the night of the PA primary. It seems to me Hilary is trying to appease the right wing on this to some degree, while sending Chelsea to mix it up "with the gays".
pansy? Ca Gov arnold used girly-men awhile back. whadda all think of that?
ReplyDelete^^Not much. ;)
ReplyDeleteI've read about the transsexuals in Iran too. In a country where capital punishment is used for the offense of being a homosexual, people will sometimes take desperate measures.
ReplyDeleteAnd now that I've had a chance to really absorb the post, one thing that jumps out at me is the filmmaker's discussion about how things are better in places like Turkey. While Turkey is largely Muslim, it is also far more secular than other Muslim countries. At least in more modern history, it does seem like there is far less room for liberal thinking in Islam than in Christianity or Judaism.
There was an op-ed piece in the NYT on Sunday that discussed two Muslim feminists, one of whom is gay. One woman's writings and beliefs are more like the filmmaker's; while the other is an atheist and doesn't believe you can ever reconcile Islam with certain values, such as feminism.
One reason I find it difficult to discuss these issues is that we tend to try to make everything equal which they aren't always. For example, western Christianity is intolerant to gays but the mainstream church is certainly not advocating gays be put to death the way it is standard practice in many Islamic countries. Islam is very extreme in this way. I don't see this extreme hatred in mainstream Christianity today. And this is not saying the intolerance isn't there but it is not on equal footing.
ReplyDeleteThe second thing that I find muddies the water is the issue of competing rights. I have friends who bash Christianity for its homophobia and sexism but refuse to in any way criticize Islam for its problems in these areas, even when their form is extremely violent. And if I do I am called a racist. I blame this approach on an oversimplified idea of the world. I believe in minority rights as long as those rights don't involve stamping out someone else's rights or promoting violence. Otherwise cultural or religious rights can simply be used as an easy way to legitimize and justify other forms of hatred. Its easy to say you are for the rights of minority if you don't have to examine issues of competing rights or tolerance for intolerance. In my opinion tolerance can be a negative thing if it creates passivity towards cruelty.
All this being said, change does need to come from within and religions can change and evolve. I sincerely hope that this crazy hatred for gay people that seems to have united so much of the world can be transformed and left in the past.
Great post Orchid. I've been struggling to find a way to say many of the same things.
ReplyDeleteIt is a little-known fact that a sexual revolution of immense proportions came to the earliest Muslims, some 1,300 years before the West had even "thunk" it. This promise of equal gender rights and, unlike in the Bible, the stress on sex as not just reproductive but also enjoyable within the confines of marriage have all but been lost in the rhetoric spewing from loudspeakers perched on masjids (mosques) in Riyadh, Marrakech, and Islamabad. The same Islam that has for centuries not only tolerated but also openly celebrated homosexuality is today used to justify a state-sanctioned program against gay men in Egypt -- America's "enlightened" friend in the Middle East.
ReplyDeleteJust came home to this fantastic post. I'm quoting the excerpt above because it's so reminiscent of what my beloved Irshad Manji made me discover about Islam and its extraordinary and nowadays little-known or thoroughly ignored contribution to our modern culture and consciousness.
I will stop here since I've had a very long day but if you don't mind I'll print the main post as well as the comments and will post about it tomorrow. :)
The only thing I would add is Christianity certainly has had it's day where it has put people to death unjustly in the name of their ideology being superior, and dominating cultures, so I am not too quick to brush it aside. I see it on par with Islamic fundamentalism, and I truly believe that if we didn't have our democracy with its separation of church and state in the U.S., you'd see religion once more taking a more powerful force in our country's morality too. You can still see it with some fundamentalist groups in this country. I really feel uncomfortable painting all people who believe in Islam with a broad brush of hatred.
ReplyDelete^^sorry, that should read "their theology being superior".
ReplyDeleteOff topic, but Ted mentions Jake (and Jake's ass, again) today: "Firm Disbeliever
ReplyDeleteLoved Jeanne Wolf’s Parade piece about Patrick Dempsey having “pec envy” over Grey’s Eric Dane. Patrick went to great lengths to tell J.W. how he doesn’t want to be ripped for TV or anything like that. Is that so? Dude’s spent many a sweaty sesh right next to my not entirely ripped ass (don’t go there, folks), preening and pumping away. Dempsey’s as self-obsessed as the rest of us, no more, no less.
Jake GyllenhaalExcept, maybe for Jake Gyllenhaal. Mr. G used to strut and stretch right next to Dempsey, me and Tobey Maguire, all at the same pumping station. Dempsey outdid us all, particularly the half-butt workout Jakey, no question. P.D. never stops. He be fibbin’ to poor Jeannie!"
"I really feel uncomfortable painting all people who believe in Islam with a broad brush of hatred."
ReplyDeleteAnother view, please don't try to change what I said into something else. If a person says it is part of their religious belief that gay people should be put to death then imo that is supporting hatred. If you are a Muslim and don't hold those beliefs then you are not supporting hatred. The problem is that people are often afraid to speak out which can result in a type of silent support.
Also we can go into the past (and present) of any religion and find violence done in its name. Certainly there has been horrendous violence committed in the name of Christianity but that is precisely why it is important to speak out against these current policies. Saying its okay for Muslims or another minority to preach hatred - and advocating gays be put to death is hate - opens the doors for other faiths to follow suit.
Also there are over a billiom Muslims worldwide. And frankly with power comes responsibility.
Yes you are right - but not all Muslims believe that. Nobody is saying it is ok for anyone to preach hatred, I'm just saying don't forget what Christianity has done in the past, they have had a chance to evolve, and need to do quite a bit more evolving if you ask me.
ReplyDeleteChristianity also knows a lot about silent support as well. Don't be too quick to let them off the hook.
ReplyDeleteYes, I agree about Christianity needing to evolve. I just don't want to go back to the past, or at least not those parts of it. I do truly understand people's need for a religious community - I think most people need spirituality. Its just sad its so hard to get the good without the bad.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, to leave things on a positive note, here is a Towleroad post about what a rather well known nun had to say on the subject of gay marriage (if only there were more like her)
"Verena von Pfetten of the Huffington Post talks to nun and art historian Sister Wendy in a recent interview, and asks a question about gay marriage and reconciling her beliefs with the church. Can we have a debate featuring Sister Wendy, Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee?
Q: You've spoken out about gay marriage. How do you balance what you believe with what you have sworn to uphold?
Sister Wendy: I believe in loyalty. We should respect our church, but never believe that the church has the last word. The church is saying "this", but I believe that sooner or later "this" will change. "This" is not the mind of our Lord. God is all love. It's a delicate balancing thing. The Church has changed it's position over the years, and because the spirit is with the Church, in the end the Church will always get it right. But in the end. The spirit of the Church is the meaning of love, which hasn't yet, perhaps, been fully understood."
Orchid, I also wasn't addressing your post personally, I made a general comment for the thread.
ReplyDelete"Christianity also knows a lot about silent support as well. Don't be too quick to let them off the hook."
ReplyDeleteDon't worry I have no illusions about Christianity - my mother was a Catholic ;)
Destiny - thanks also for your comment. I've popped into chat a few times looking for but no luck. Hope we get to talk again soon :)
ReplyDeleteI understand, another view. Have a good night and nice talking with you.
ReplyDeleteYou too, Orchid. :) It's all about getting things out in the open for discussion, which can only be a good thing. Good night! :)
ReplyDeleteI agree Another View that it is very important to have a separation between church and state.
ReplyDeleteAnd there have certainly been periods when Christianity was far more intolerant than Islam, in particular during the Inquisition, when it was in the Muslim countries that Jews found refuge. Now there are Muslim countries (Saudi Arabia) that don't even allow Jews to travel there, let alone live there.
Sorry to miss you in chat Orchid! I've had so much going on the past week or so that I haven't gotten to spend any time in there. Maybe later this week?
ReplyDelete^I'll look for you later this week :)
ReplyDelete"It's all about getting things out in the open for discussion, which can only be a good thing'
ReplyDeleteI agree and one reason I love this blog so much!
'I dont think God has the same hang ups about sex that people do. Can you imagine God being angry about love. I can't.'
ReplyDeleteTom, amazingly put. It s;ays it all.
Something all the people who 'hate' in the name of religion should think about
Please let it be bullshit.
ReplyDelete"One of Hollywood's hottest couples may soon be headed our way. Rumour has it, none other than Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal will be here to star in an epic new flick called 2012. It centres around a group of people who face natural disasters, such as typhoons and volcanoes, that coincide with the end of the Mayan calendar in 2012. Filming is expected to get underway in Los Angeles and in Vancouver in late June. 2012 will hit theatres next year."
Jake call Ben
Disaster of a movie the only thing good would be if Reese got suck up in typhooon, or volcano, or tornado.
Please let it be the sign of the end of Reeke instead of a movie.
2012
Filming is expected to get underway in Los Angeles and in Vancouver in late June.
ReplyDeleteWill Nailed even be finished by then? And if it is, would Jake want to jump from one project right into another? Not too much listed about it @ IMDb.
KIrsten Dunst turns 26 today. Happy birthday Kiki!
ReplyDeleteIMDb - Posted Sat Mar 22 2008
ReplyDeleteA Mexican newspaper is claiming the film will star Russell Crowe and Monica Belluci. I seriously doubt Crowe is doing it. His next film is supposed to be the Robin Hood re-imagining, Nottingham, for Ridley Scott, likely to begin filming as soon as the SAG contract is no longer a problem, probably this summer or fall.
Elfinanciero