ALL CAPS

she was like ahhh ... ... ummm ....ahhhh help me out

When rain, hair gel and the red carpet collide,

somebody's gonna get hurt.

Hey the 'stache was to balance my unibrow,

I wasn't allowed to pluck that young.

Call me a wild turkey, or grey goose

but I draw the line at swallow.

Got one to share?

New year new law (in California)

A new California law went into effect yesterday that increases penalties against overly aggressive photographers — dubbed "stalkerazzi" — who forcefully thrust their cameras into famous faces or crash their car into a celebrity's vehicle. They'll now be liable for three times the damages they inflict, plus lose any payments their published photos might earn. Publishers can also be held liable. But it might effect other media like the newspapers than thought.

"This law now gives (celebrities) the ability to quash a photograph, and potentially a story (resulting from the photograph), with a frivolous lawsuit in an attempt to keep the public from being informed," "The Constitution demands a little bit higher standard before the government puts the kibosh on a newspaper's ability to publish that story."

The California Newspaper Publishers Assn., questioned the constitutionality of that law, but it has not been challenged in court, yet. Laws are presumed valid until challenged. The challenge will that the new legislation, which expands what constitutes invasion of privacy, is probably even more unconstitutional.

Photos: IHJ, WDW, ANJ