PrairieGirl, that tweet you posted about an Austin siting was actually Portage, Indiana. And surprisingly there are more Austin Nichols in the USA than just that actor fella. Like, for instance, much written about, wildly recruited, next white hope, high school bballer, Austin Nichols. Coulda been him in Portage, Indiana.
Sorry - Austin Nichols from this blog - actually has family in Portage Michigan. Yes. Portage MICHIGAN.
And Austin Nichols the ball player is from Tennessee. And he's committed to Tennessee for his college career. No need for him to looking for schools in basketball powerhouse state Indiana now.
Sorry!
Your consolation prize is a year' supply of Rice-A-Roni.
lol, wow looks like I missed all the fun last night. Finally made some people do some work last night. **wink**
Yup, looks like I blew this one, blew it right out of the water by not looking at that guy's profile, kind of an elementary mistake on my part. And I knew when I saw that tweet under Austin's name and not twitter name that it could be the bball player but well, not going to expand further just for interest's sake. While no one likes to be wrong on something, there's nothing one can do but simply say Mistakes Were Made, hence the name of my journal.
And there will be other times when I'll or someone else on here will be wrong on something again. We've been right on alot.
But I have no doubt the guys are together wherever it is they're at and at this point, I'm going to lean back towards Cali because of the FB sighting.
Couple of things that haven't changed for me. That NYC biking photo op was staged and I don't believe Jake has been in NYC and 2) that @darlinangel twitter account was faking it. She carried that act on too long and she blew her credibility when she tried to act like Austin was repeatedly DM'ing her. So no, if you're going to try and use her as proof he was in TX, you've got no purchase from me.
Anyway, thanks to Geography up there for the catch. Gee, I wish we had this kind of help in our working Production Dept behind the scenes on a daily basis, lol.
But that's what the blog is for to put stuff out there.
Okay, as Seaweed has said earlier, back to regularly scheduled programming, which means, when it comes to these two guys, underground silence.
Or is it the UK? You've got stuff floating out there of Jake in the UK. And yes, there was a Michigan tweet sighting of Jake on Friday the 24th, although it was East Lansing.
Wherever it is, you know that when you see this much activity, it's being done to muddy the waters. According to Twitter, between these 2 guys, they are currently in 4 different states as well an outside country.
And you know what, don't be clogging up this sight with all the tweets like you do on WFT2. If you're going to do it, do it right.
Post the name of the account, the date and the time. Otherwise, it looks like you're just pulling something out of the sky. The name needs to be given in case somebody else wants to go take a look at it. See how it helped Geography up there? lol. Seriously though, that's why.
I've seen every single tweet/FB that you're posting. How funny is it that we've not had tweets from people encountering Jake on his bike until the photo op that was supposedly from Thursday. And then suddenly, there were several that magically appeared. How obvious is that. **rolls eyes**
All right, I'm taking off. I'm not getting into it with the likes of who is on here right now. He can go back home because he's not getting the attention here.
LOL. Do you reckon if someone tweeted about a male co-worker of yours or phoned you about seeing your brother at a local bar and grill, that the first thing out of their mouth would be And he was with a girllll Gasp.
That tweet's so lame, it wasn't funny. Jake's team loves people like you who buy every single one of these like a sugar capsule. One reason why they can't stand us around here. lol. Love it.
BTW, thank you very much for providing the name and at least the date.
If he could be seen at a restaurant with a girlll, gee, I wonder why he couldn't have rounded one up for the Met Gala? Or the Knicks game? Or for lunch when he met up with America and that Randall Malone actor from EOW? Or at the Brooklyn Nets game? What about when he went to the ol' Chateau Marmont? That's a hopping place for young, single celebs, isn't it? My gosh, that Edible Schoolyard Benefit was in a very romantic looking setting with all the pretty lights and darkened lighting. Perfect opportunity to bring a female date. Didn't see one with him though, did anyone else? Did I miss something there?
Let's see, where else has he been where he could have taken a female companion as a date? How about the Sundance Festival? Now there's a getaway for ya. But no. He had his mother's head on his shoulder instead. **Oh snap!** Darnit. Mom won that one out, didn't she?
If I recall right, his mother was seen at the high brow Edible Schoolyard benefit as well. Rats! lol. Boy, it's a tough hole to crack for the women folk, isn't it with ol' mom being first on the dance card?
Oh yes, and then there was also the Lucille Lortel Awards show? Anyone? Recall?
There was another society event - the Paul Newman tribute in NYC, a great opportunity to showcase a beautiful female date. Let's see, who did he take? Oh yeah, that's right. His mother, Naomi Foner.
And then there was Easter Sunday this year when he supposedly had brunch/dinner and took a Easter Sunday stroll for the paps and who was at his side....let's see, oh yeah, his mom. Emily Dido had just been in town that previous Thursday doing a Maybelline shoot. But who did he go out with?
Mom.
So for someone who has no problem having fake stories like with Dido being his girlfriend and their meeting at Spin floated or who sets the girls' Lycra on fire at Spin by taking his shirt off all the time, when it comes time to put up or shut up going out on a public date, who does he go out with? He goes out with Mom.
It's interesting when you roll it out like that, isn't it?
And it would be different if his team didn't try to sell something like the Emily Dido relationship or Jake himself didn't participate in things like that Lakers ass leer nonsense. Or you didn't have Adam Levine recruited to take a magazine cover story and tell people to stop thinking Jake as gay just because of Brokeback Mountain.
If you're going to take that route, you're going to have to be prepared for people pointing out the contradictions.
They hate it when we are right. The biking pics were obviously staged.
No Dear, You all hate it when someone fact checks you and prove you're Wrong. Nobody here can stand it. So they resort to, "It's Jake's PR". Yeah, that'll explain us not being wrong.
That way you'll never be wrong.
Everybody knows this by now. It's a tactic commonly used here for years now. Not once, and I mean once have any regular poster here admitted to being wrong when there has been plenty of real evidence of wrongful information about Jake and Austin by regular posters.
You just go umm "It's PR", then the church choirs chorus begins. And mostly led by the lead vocalist. We all know who that is.
You all hate it when someone fact checks you and prove you're Wrong. Nobody here can stand it.
Where is the basis for this statement?
Prairie Girl said: Yup, looks like I blew this one, blew it right out of the water by not looking at that guy's profile, kind of an elementary mistake on my part.
Anyway, thanks to Geography up there for the catch.
Hey, sweetums. Is that all you have to say? The pic of Jake biking in "NY" was obviously staged. Plenty of evidence was provided too. You're the one who can't stand that your precious Jake is constantly lying to his fans.
And, who is this "we" your talkin' about? Another thing, why don't you focus on Prairie Girl's wonderful stroll down memory lane and Jake's years of non-existent dates? I bet I know why. Because it looks all kinds of suspicious that he never is seen with these lady loves on actual dates when he has ample opportunity to help sell himself as a real man. He never talks about this women either. Yet, tons of PR stories leak to the Internet telling us exactly what we should think. "We" know those bike photos were devastating to you. That's why you continue to try to distract and harp on only certain aspects of people's comments while completely ignoring others that don't fit your agenda.
Everybody knows this by now. It's a tactic commonly used here for years now. Not once, and I mean once have any regular poster here admitted to being wrong when there has been plenty of real evidence of wrongful information about Jake and Austin by regular posters.
We'll you've just lost all credibility. Not that you had any in the first place. The blog administrator has admitted her errors without hesitation throughout the years. So have others. Also, see comments above @ 6:27 am and again @ 4:52 pm. Geesh. Why don't you learn to read and comprehend before you blog? Elemental, really.
Just laying out the facts, 17:19. Because that is what those were, were they not? Facts? You're always accusing us OMG'ers of "ignoring facts", are you not?
Jake going to all those events? Fact. Jake attending a good handful of those with his mother and not Emily Dido or some other mystery gal? Fact.
The pic of Jake biking in "NY" was obviously staged. Plenty of evidence was provided too.
I hate to interrupt this attempted sidestepping and re-writing of history, but the original argument that was put forth was that the pictures of Jake on the bicycle were taken somewhere other than NY (likely Michigan or California), based on the fact that riding on the sidewalk was "big time illegal" and the street was too empty to be a NY street. Myself and others pointed out that 1) it wasn't "big time illegal" 2) it was also illegal to ride in the same manner in California and Michigan 3) there are other pictures and accounts of celebrities riding on the fairly empty sidewalks in NY and 4) Jake has apparently engaged in activities that actually are "big time illegal" so would hardly be bothered by a $100 fine in the unlikely event he was stopped.
And in time honored fashion, Methodical Muser remained silent while a host of "new" posters coincidentally parroted her position, prairiegirl Donald Duck'd out of the whole thing and Special K comically misinterpreted what was going on and is now stuck with a years supply of Rice-A-Roni
You're always accusing us OMG'ers of "ignoring facts", are you not?
Jake going to all those events? Fact. Jake attending a good handful of those with his mother and not Emily Dido or some other mystery gal? Fact.
Well, if we put on our OMGoggles we could argue that just because Jake isn't photographed with a person, doesn't mean that that person wasn't there, right?
^^ Who cares?? Jake and many other actors PR people plant stories, even HW biggest stars do this for their clients. What's the big deal???
They "ALL" play this game. Ever watch the stupid TMZ? Now if they aren't in the cohoots with the PR/publicist just as the other rags.
But to continue this narrative that every Freakin move Jake makes and his whereabouts is to confuse and counter the OMG posters because of his supposed Gay life is Very Very Far Fetched! And if you can't see this or understand this, you never will. It's useless because in your eyes it's always to counter a certain belief. The point is, you believe Jake is hiding something big and some don't agree. Or don't agree with every scope of this so-called big hidden story or "family and 6 children". If he's gay, so what! I hope he comes out when "he's" ready! I have nothing to do with any of it and no one else does either.
You will always feel the PR is scooping down your throat to attack your beliefs. I happen to think it's total parinoia.
Jake going to all those events? Fact. Jake attending a good handful of those with his mother and not Emily Dido or some other mystery gal? Fact.
Who cares????
It explains nothing Really. But in your eyes the ole PR people are trying to confuse us. Does this mean Jake is married to Austin? Does this mean Jake has 5+ children? Does this mean Jake and Austin live together?
NO is the answer to all of the above questions and all regular posters here "KNOW" This!!!!
But complaining about PR endlessly will remedy all of it for them, so they use it constantly.
Wow! I'm just catching up for the week and I see that one of the resident nitpickers is irritated yet again. Bottom line, for me, is that the bike ride was illegal, if it took place in NY as the tweets, articles and Just Jared post tells us it did. Who cares that someone called the infraction "big time" or not? Who cares if it was pointed out that in Michigan and California the same law does not apply. (By the way, a fact I looked up and confirmed is true.) As a reader, I'm interested in the main concept. Which before it was pointed out to me, I would have missed completely.
That is that the bike ride was staged. I've been watching Jake and his PR team set up these lies for years. Doesn't matter whether it's CAA or WME. Nothing's change. The fact you continue to lurk here to defend Jake says all I need to know about you.
And why is somebody mentioning Jake and 5+ children when the nother point was about Jake hanging out with his mother and never actually dating anyone? No one mentioned children. No one mentioned Austin. No one mentioned that Jake and Austin were married. The fact you decided to specifically select those issues tell me what you're real worries are.
Frankly, I think it's hilarious that you are here every day. Keep posting your telling me what YOU FEAR MOST.
As a reader, I'm interested in the main concept. Which before it was pointed out to me, I would have missed completely.
That is that the bike ride was staged
Thank you. The old "look over here, not over there" technique.
----For the record, my use of the phrase, "big time," merely means "very much so". In other words, it is not up for debate or subject to controversy.
Put simply. There is a law against riding a bicycle on the sidewalk in New York City. Therefore, someone who violates that law, is committing an unlawful act that is very much illegal. You can fuss and carp all you want. But, it is what it is. How much one is fined is wholly irrelevant.
PrairieGirl, that tweet you posted about an Austin siting was actually Portage, Indiana. And surprisingly there are more Austin Nichols in the USA than just that actor fella. Like, for instance, much written about, wildly recruited, next white hope, high school bballer, Austin Nichols. Coulda been him in Portage, Indiana.
ReplyDeleteWow. Love this spin.
ReplyDeleteSorry - Austin Nichols from this blog - actually has family in Portage Michigan. Yes. Portage MICHIGAN.
And Austin Nichols the ball player is from Tennessee. And he's committed to Tennessee for his college career. No need for him to looking for schools in basketball powerhouse state Indiana now.
Sorry!
Your consolation prize is a year' supply of Rice-A-Roni.
Jordan Lamborghini
ReplyDeleteJordan Lamborghini
@gallaballa23
Connoisseur, Philanthropist, Pioneer. Lamborghini Gallardo. Junior at VHS.
Valparaiso, IN
yes INDIANA not Michigan
PrairieGirl said
ReplyDelete"You know, all Austin did was post a picture of the Texas flag. He never tweeted that he was there."
Yes he did
https://twitter.com/darlinnangel/status/334061543601881089/photo/1
Sorry troll @ 12:54, that's called a DM, not a tweet, so NO HE DIDN'T
ReplyDeletelol, wow looks like I missed all the fun last night. Finally made some people do some work last night. **wink**
ReplyDeleteYup, looks like I blew this one, blew it right out of the water by not looking at that guy's profile, kind of an elementary mistake on my part. And I knew when I saw that tweet under Austin's name and not twitter name that it could be the bball player but well, not going to expand further just for interest's sake. While no one likes to be wrong on something, there's nothing one can do but simply say Mistakes Were Made, hence the name of my journal.
And there will be other times when I'll or someone else on here will be wrong on something again. We've been right on alot.
But I have no doubt the guys are together wherever it is they're at and at this point, I'm going to lean back towards Cali because of the FB sighting.
Couple of things that haven't changed for me. That NYC biking photo op was staged and I don't believe Jake has been in NYC and 2) that @darlinangel twitter account was faking it. She carried that act on too long and she blew her credibility when she tried to act like Austin was repeatedly DM'ing her. So no, if you're going to try and use her as proof he was in TX, you've got no purchase from me.
Anyway, thanks to Geography up there for the catch. Gee, I wish we had this kind of help in our working Production Dept behind the scenes on a daily basis, lol.
ReplyDeleteBut that's what the blog is for to put stuff out there.
Okay, as Seaweed has said earlier, back to regularly scheduled programming, which means, when it comes to these two guys, underground silence.
Back to sentry duty lol!
I'm going to lean back towards Cali because of the FB sighting.
ReplyDeleteAnd what about this FB sighting?
Jake gyllenhaal almost hit me oh his bike. I think I would have been ok with it.
May 24 near New York, NY via mobile
@darlinangel twitter account was faking it
ReplyDeleteno she wasn't
James Cho
ReplyDeleteDunno if Jake Gyllenhaal is in NY, but looks like he's getting some chicken n rice in union square.
Or is it the UK? You've got stuff floating out there of Jake in the UK. And yes, there was a Michigan tweet sighting of Jake on Friday the 24th, although it was East Lansing.
ReplyDeleteWherever it is, you know that when you see this much activity, it's being done to muddy the waters. According to Twitter, between these 2 guys, they are currently in 4 different states as well an outside country.
And you know what, don't be clogging up this sight with all the tweets like you do on WFT2. If you're going to do it, do it right.
Post the name of the account, the date and the time. Otherwise, it looks like you're just pulling something out of the sky. The name needs to be given in case somebody else wants to go take a look at it. See how it helped Geography up there? lol. Seriously though, that's why.
I've seen every single tweet/FB that you're posting. How funny is it that we've not had tweets from people encountering Jake on his bike until the photo op that was supposedly from Thursday. And then suddenly, there were several that magically appeared. How obvious is that. **rolls eyes**
All right, I'm taking off. I'm not getting into it with the likes of who is on here right now. He can go back home because he's not getting the attention here.
I guess you're not aware of the phenomenon that is mistaken sitings on twitter? It's all PR cover-up? "Muddying the waters"?
ReplyDeleteOh and there's yet another Austin Nichols from Indiana if the basketball player from Memphis doesn't pan out.
They hate it when we are right. The biking pics were obviously staged.
ReplyDeleteOne more day then headed home. Checking in and I see we are hot on the trail. The closer to the truth the more defensive the troll gets.
ReplyDeleteGood catch about how Jake never seems to take a woman anywhere. Always in the company of men.
Good catch about how Jake never seems to take a woman anywhere. Always in the company of men
ReplyDeleteNot true
Matt Cohen @itsbongoboy
saw jake gyllenhall on the Bowery tonight with a girl. wanted to drop a donnie darko quote, but i refrained myself
May 21
"with a girl"
ReplyDeleteLOL. Do you reckon if someone tweeted about a male co-worker of yours or phoned you about seeing your brother at a local bar and grill, that the first thing out of their mouth would be And he was with a girllll Gasp.
That tweet's so lame, it wasn't funny. Jake's team loves people like you who buy every single one of these like a sugar capsule. One reason why they can't stand us around here. lol. Love it.
BTW, thank you very much for providing the name and at least the date.
If he could be seen at a restaurant with a girlll, gee, I wonder why he couldn't have rounded one up for the Met Gala? Or the Knicks game? Or for lunch when he met up with America and that Randall Malone actor from EOW? Or at the Brooklyn Nets game? What about when he went to the ol' Chateau Marmont? That's a hopping place for young, single celebs, isn't it? My gosh, that Edible Schoolyard Benefit was in a very romantic looking setting with all the pretty lights and darkened lighting. Perfect opportunity to bring a female date. Didn't see one with him though, did anyone else? Did I miss something there?
ReplyDeleteLet's see, where else has he been where he could have taken a female companion as a date? How about the Sundance Festival? Now there's a getaway for ya. But no. He had his mother's head on his shoulder instead. **Oh snap!** Darnit. Mom won that one out, didn't she?
If I recall right, his mother was seen at the high brow Edible Schoolyard benefit as well. Rats! lol. Boy, it's a tough hole to crack for the women folk, isn't it with ol' mom being first on the dance card?
Oh yes, and then there was also the Lucille Lortel Awards show? Anyone? Recall?
Female?
Date?
There was another society event - the Paul Newman tribute in NYC, a great opportunity to showcase a beautiful female date. Let's see, who did he take? Oh yeah, that's right. His mother, Naomi Foner.
ReplyDeleteAnd then there was Easter Sunday this year when he supposedly had brunch/dinner and took a Easter Sunday stroll for the paps and who was at his side....let's see, oh yeah, his mom. Emily Dido had just been in town that previous Thursday doing a Maybelline shoot. But who did he go out with?
Mom.
So for someone who has no problem having fake stories like with Dido being his girlfriend and their meeting at Spin floated or who sets the girls' Lycra on fire at Spin by taking his shirt off all the time, when it comes time to put up or shut up going out on a public date, who does he go out with? He goes out with Mom.
It's interesting when you roll it out like that, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteAnd it would be different if his team didn't try to sell something like the Emily Dido relationship or Jake himself didn't participate in things like that Lakers ass leer nonsense. Or you didn't have Adam Levine recruited to take a magazine cover story and tell people to stop thinking Jake as gay just because of Brokeback Mountain.
If you're going to take that route, you're going to have to be prepared for people pointing out the contradictions.
They hate it when we are right. The biking pics were obviously staged.
ReplyDeleteNo Dear, You all hate it when someone fact checks you and prove you're Wrong. Nobody here can stand it. So they resort to, "It's Jake's PR". Yeah, that'll explain us not being wrong.
That way you'll never be wrong.
Everybody knows this by now. It's a tactic commonly used here for years now.
Not once, and I mean once have any regular poster here admitted to being wrong when there has been plenty of real evidence of wrongful information about Jake and Austin by regular posters.
You just go umm "It's PR", then the church choirs chorus begins.
And mostly led by the lead vocalist.
We all know who that is.
You all hate it when someone fact checks you and prove you're Wrong. Nobody here can stand it.
ReplyDeleteWhere is the basis for this statement?
Prairie Girl said:
Yup, looks like I blew this one, blew it right out of the water by not looking at that guy's profile, kind of an elementary mistake on my part.
Anyway, thanks to Geography up there for the catch.
Hey, sweetums. Is that all you have to say? The pic of Jake biking in "NY" was obviously staged. Plenty of evidence was provided too. You're the one who can't stand that your precious Jake is constantly lying to his fans.
ReplyDeleteAnd, who is this "we" your talkin' about? Another thing, why don't you focus on Prairie Girl's wonderful stroll down memory lane and Jake's years of non-existent dates? I bet I know why. Because it looks all kinds of suspicious that he never is seen with these lady loves on actual dates when he has ample opportunity to help sell himself as a real man. He never talks about this women either. Yet, tons of PR stories leak to the Internet telling us exactly what we should think. "We" know those bike photos were devastating to you. That's why you continue to try to distract and harp on only certain aspects of people's comments while completely ignoring others that don't fit your agenda.
Everybody knows this by now. It's a tactic commonly used here for years now.
ReplyDeleteNot once, and I mean once have any regular poster here admitted to being wrong when there has been plenty of real evidence of wrongful information about Jake and Austin by regular posters.
We'll you've just lost all credibility. Not that you had any in the first place. The blog administrator has admitted her errors without hesitation throughout the years. So have others. Also, see comments above @ 6:27 am and again @ 4:52 pm. Geesh. Why don't you learn to read and comprehend before you blog? Elemental, really.
Just laying out the facts, 17:19. Because that is what those were, were they not? Facts? You're always accusing us OMG'ers of "ignoring facts", are you not?
ReplyDeleteJake going to all those events? Fact. Jake attending a good handful of those with his mother and not Emily Dido or some other mystery gal? Fact.
**shrugs** #SorryNotSorry
The pic of Jake biking in "NY" was obviously staged. Plenty of evidence was provided too.
ReplyDeleteI hate to interrupt this attempted sidestepping and re-writing of history, but the original argument that was put forth was that the pictures of Jake on the bicycle were taken somewhere other than NY (likely Michigan or California), based on the fact that riding on the sidewalk was "big time illegal" and the street was too empty to be a NY street. Myself and others pointed out that 1) it wasn't "big time illegal" 2) it was also illegal to ride in the same manner in California and Michigan 3) there are other pictures and accounts of celebrities riding on the fairly empty sidewalks in NY and 4) Jake has apparently engaged in activities that actually are "big time illegal" so would hardly be bothered by a $100 fine in the unlikely event he was stopped.
And in time honored fashion, Methodical Muser remained silent while a host of "new" posters coincidentally parroted her position, prairiegirl Donald Duck'd out of the whole thing and Special K comically misinterpreted what was going on and is now stuck with a years supply of Rice-A-Roni
You're always accusing us OMG'ers of "ignoring facts", are you not?
Jake going to all those events? Fact. Jake attending a good handful of those with his mother and not Emily Dido or some other mystery gal? Fact.
Well, if we put on our OMGoggles we could argue that just because Jake isn't photographed with a person, doesn't mean that that person wasn't there, right?
#OhwaitthatlogiconlyappliestoAustin
#andtheirfive(six?)children
#kanyeshrug
^^ Who cares?? Jake and many other actors PR people plant stories, even HW biggest stars do this for their clients. What's the big deal???
ReplyDeleteThey "ALL" play this game. Ever watch the stupid TMZ? Now if they aren't in the cohoots with the PR/publicist just as the other rags.
But to continue this narrative that every Freakin move Jake makes and his whereabouts is to confuse and counter the OMG posters because of his supposed Gay life is Very Very Far Fetched! And if you can't see this or understand this, you never will. It's useless because in your eyes it's always to counter a certain belief. The point is, you believe Jake is hiding something big and some don't agree. Or don't agree with every scope of this so-called big hidden story or "family and 6 children". If he's gay, so what! I hope he comes out when "he's" ready! I have nothing to do with any of it and no one else does either.
You will always feel the PR is scooping down your throat to attack your beliefs. I happen to think it's total parinoia.
comment 5:45 was for PG
ReplyDeleteIt so obvious why Jake doesnt have a steady girl. Je just hasnt found that perfect one to be the mother of his children yet:-)
ReplyDeleteJake going to all those events? Fact. Jake attending a good handful of those with his mother and not Emily Dido or some other mystery gal? Fact.
ReplyDeleteWho cares????
It explains nothing Really. But in your eyes the ole PR people are trying to confuse us.
Does this mean Jake is married to Austin?
Does this mean Jake has 5+ children?
Does this mean Jake and Austin live together?
NO is the answer to all of the above questions and all regular posters here "KNOW" This!!!!
But complaining about PR endlessly will remedy all of it for them, so they use it constantly.
Wow! I'm just catching up for the week and I see that one of the resident nitpickers is irritated yet again. Bottom line, for me, is that the bike ride was illegal, if it took place in NY as the tweets, articles and Just Jared post tells us it did. Who cares that someone called the infraction "big time" or not? Who cares if it was pointed out that in Michigan and California the same law does not apply. (By the way, a fact I looked up and confirmed is true.) As a reader, I'm interested in the main concept. Which before it was pointed out to me, I would have missed completely.
ReplyDeleteThat is that the bike ride was staged. I've been watching Jake and his PR team set up these lies for years. Doesn't matter whether it's CAA or WME. Nothing's change. The fact you continue to lurk here to defend Jake says all I need to know about you.
And why is somebody mentioning Jake and 5+ children when the nother point was about Jake hanging out with his mother and never actually dating anyone? No one mentioned children. No one mentioned Austin. No one mentioned that Jake and Austin were married. The fact you decided to specifically select those issues tell me what you're real worries are.
Frankly, I think it's hilarious that you are here every day. Keep posting your telling me what YOU FEAR MOST.
there are other pictures and accounts of celebrities riding on the fairly empty sidewalks in NY
ReplyDeletePhotos: Scofflaw Celebrities (Gyllenhaal! DiCaprio! Uh...Jonas!) Biking On NYC Sidewalks
Geeeee. I wonder what these three guys have in common? Jake Gyllenhaal. Leonardo DiCaprio. Joe Jonas.
As a reader, I'm interested in the main concept. Which before it was pointed out to me, I would have missed completely.
ReplyDeleteThat is that the bike ride was staged
Thank you. The old "look over here, not over there" technique.
----For the record, my use of the phrase, "big time," merely means "very much so". In other words, it is not up for debate or subject to controversy.
Put simply. There is a law against riding a bicycle on the sidewalk in New York City. Therefore, someone who violates that law, is committing an unlawful act that is very much illegal. You can fuss and carp all you want. But, it is what it is. How much one is fined is wholly irrelevant.