The Saints are coming and so are the Colts . Where? The Super Bowl, but they're not the only ones.
Signs point that Prince of Persia is Super Bowl Bound.
Word is PoP could jump into the party mix of Super Bowl ads. That stiff competition to some of the inventive and creative ads that are specially made for this self created American holiday. But he's not alone, the Prince might mix it with "Robin Hood" "Iron Man" and "The Last Airbender," and those scene stealing macho men Buzz and Woody.
Is it me, or does that list sound like the characters in a bad porn? 
Dastan you've just had your ad in the Super Bowl, what are you going to do now?
I'm going back to work. I'm going to Disney World.
DVD Alert: For those in the US who didn't get a chance to catch Brothers in the theater, you don't have a long wait to catch it on DVD. It was just announced that Brothers will be out on Blu-Ray on March 23. Put it on your Netflix so you don't miss another great performance.
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Super PoP
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
205 comments:
1 – 200 of 205 Newer› Newest»I'm supposed to feel bad for Jake, who can afford all kinds of security, because he had a few death threats from a few nuts while all those unimportant ordinary people are out there being attacked and dying because someone suspects or knows they are gay?
Why does Jake get a pass?
And more importantly, people like Jake who beard and pretend to be stepdad to their beards children and otherwise tell the world that being gay is such a bad thing that you have to pretend to be straight and hide their child are one reason why gay bashers think it is okay to attack gay people. They either look and see there are no gay stars, no gay quarterbacks, and they tell themselves that the fact there are no "cool" people who are gay just shows it is a bad thing.
Finally, you don't have to be gay to get looney tunes threatening you. Unfortunately it just goes with the territory when you are famous. Just ask David Letterman, Gerald Ford, or countless other people. I was just reading another such case in the past week or so, but can't remember for the life of me who they are. Even someone like George Stephanopolous. He lived in my building for awhile, and during that time he was being stalked by some woman, I even saw her hanging out front once. She got arrested when she followed him to a restaurant in the neighborhood.
Stubborn TB, what you said in ur previous post (last one on the previous page) supports my point exactly:
There are folks with cameras everywhere, taking pictures of everyone and everything. JBG is a big enough star that lots of folks recognize him everywhere. We have Twitter for proof of that.
Therefore, unless he just steadfastly never goes anywhere with BT, i just can't believe there is a BT. To keep that secret for 3 years, especially considered BT is a well-known entity in the gossip circles, is just not believable to me.
I do believe that his assistant might've had a baby, come along on the trip with a stroller and been a part of the entourage, but staying on the outskirts to keep her own face and child out of the pics. I agree that there must be some explanation for the stroller in the back of the car if that was in fact part of their stuff. The horse was kinda weird???
I don't have a dog in this fight at all - i don't care either way about the existence of BT - i just happen to not believe it. I'm enjoying the debate and hope ya'll don't mind me tagging along arguing. However, if the gen con is that we should shut up about it, i'll go along with that flow as well. S.
I know this is a site to have fun and to talk about Jake and Austin, but at times like this I feel like I have to speak my mind, politically.
If nobody had ever come out of the closet, there would be no gay rights movement. That is what Stonewall and Milk were all about.
I usually don't like to demand answers, but I really want to know why Jake gets a pass, and why people think he needs to be protected at all costs.
Is his life more valuable than that of the teenager who was brutally murdered in Puerto Rico last year for being gay? For anyone who cares to know about it, here's the link, but I warn you, it was really a horrific crime. href="http://www.towleroad.com/2009/11/man-arrested-in-horrific-murder-of-puerto-rican-gay-teen.html"> Towleroad
And before anyone dares suggest it, no, I don't want anything to happen to Jake, as I don't want anything to happen to any gay person. My question has to do with why people think Jake needs protecting, and why they think someone who makes $7 million dollars for one acting job can't afford to protect himself.
I agree with Destiny. All celeb parents deal with issues involving their kids. It goes with the territory. They learn how to make things work. I dont see jake as being that big a star as Tom Cruise and Bradgelina and they seem to get buy and protect their children. I still think the reason jake is staying in the closet and bearding is because he is an ambitious man who wants to be a star. He will do anything he has to do to make that happen. I am sure if jake has a child he loves and cares for it. I am sure he worries for it. Jake is a guy who wants it all and will do what he has to do to get it..
I think Jake can be a good parent an a big star if he has the talent. Destiny God i cant agree with yiu more when you say kids need to know gay people are cool people too. If Jake, or Clooney, or Quinto came out it would mean so much. Just picking some athletes at random like a Peyton Manning, Kobie Bryan, or a Derek Jeter came out it would change so many lives for gay kids. I strongly believe that. I am not saying it is the most important thing but it would make a difference. Kids have idols.
I hope to God I never see jake beard again and i think if he does have a kid he will eventually come out and share his story with us.
I agree the decision they made was to protect the baby of possibly threats and stalker behaviour from homophobic groups. But there was also the possibility of doing like Ricky Martin did. One of them admitting he has a kid but remain closeted. I think the general public buy what they are fed and they could said Jake adopted a kid on his own or have him with an ex-girlfriend that got pregnant but he’s now raising the kid. Austin is not photographed much so it wouldn’t be a problem for him to be out with the kid if Jake was the public father.
I believe the McBongo’s kid pics are staged. His kid is his main marketing tool now for his family man image. The same with all the celebrity kids pics that are around. If you want to keep a kid private, it’s possible. Ramona is hardly photographed for example.
Sorry for the bad link job. That is the address for anyone who wants it.
Totally agree Tom and MKT.
I detest bearding and I'd love that Jake and Austin were out but maybe they don't want BT to be a political statement and this is their own calling. It sucks and I wish it was different, but I understand that they are public figures and I think their decision was in part to protect the kid from homophobia. Although as I said in my previous post, there were other alternatives to admit a baby without coming out like Ricky Martin did.
I agree with the above posts as well. I don't think Jake is rolling in money like many of you do: making 7M on a movie doesn't mean getting 7M, and also, we don't know what his debts are. If he bought a house (which he alluded to at one time) before the bust, he could be in a bind because of that. He also may've made some bad investments or been forced to bail out his parents. So just because he makes a lot of money doesn't mean he has a lot of money.
However, if he had a kid and came out with it, he would just deal with that like everyone else does. Have muscle dude go along with him like they had in paris - he seemed to like that guy better than reese, by the way! :) I don't think that - as a general rule - stars and their children are targeted by nasty people, and being gay with a kid is more of a career downer for him, imo, not a personal danger.
It would be a sensation, of course, and everyone would want to get pics at first and get all the details, and i doubt an old girlfriend would carry much weight, since he doesn't really have many old girlfriends. Of course it could just be a one night stand gone bad, but why wait till now to come out with it? Unless he just found out, etc....
He could make it work if he wanted to, i'm pretty sure. If there really is a BT, then i feel he's doing it an injustice by hiding it. Yes, i agree with D that he's doing the gay community in general an injustice by closeting and bearding, etc, but that is his choice. It's just too bad that - if he was going to follow this path - he didn't do a better job of keeping his secrets in the beginning. S.
Destiny, you are not Jake and you have not walked in his shoes.
I agree with Stubborn on everything she said. It's alright to disagree. My thing is, Destiny you seem to get bent out of shape too often on the affairs of Jake and I don't think it's right. I know we've been down this road before but, May I remind you, you still do not know that all the rumors about Jake is true, So why the hostility. This is what I don't understand.
You have no idea what it's like to be a gay man, and one in the publics eye also. I do agree with you that all faces of a gay man need to be seen and seen by everyone, not just some gay fashion designer or some campy hair dresser that everyone (laughs at). It is the masculine non asuming one's who ARE passing as straight who would help the gay cause, But, It's Jake's life and his only. You nor I have can put demands on him. I don't care if he is a public figure or not. It's his life. If there is a BT (which I think is absurd and Crazy) he also has the right to raise him the best way he sees fit. Nobody else, not even a sometimes FAN.
I will state I do not believe Ted.
I have more respect for Jake and Austin and don't think they would do something so foolish.
JMO
My thing is, Destiny you seem to get bent out of shape too often on the affairs of Jake and I don't think it's right.
That's rich coming from you. LOL!
bbm films, you're always demanding answers from me and Tom, so answer mine. Why does Jake get to be treated differently? Is his life more valuable than the teenagers dying in the streets because they don't have the money and resources that Jake does to live in a gated community, have a bodyguard when he needs it, etc.
I am not gonna leave Destiny hung out to dry. I agree with everything she says.
On hearing that the blonde nanny was walking right next to reeses nanny I am now 90 sure BT exists.
That photo op went a little array that day. They got a little too close and Ava did what kids do. They react to stimuli and ava knew the women and child well. And no asst of jakes would take a child of her own at that age to Paris to work. No way.
please tell me this site isn't full of blind Ted fans. If some have still a brain, give me sign
"They got a little too close and Ava did what kids do. They react to stimuli and ava knew the women and child well. And no asst of jakes would take a child of her own at that age to Paris to work. No way."
but Jake completely ignore this kid,you even see him react with ava on others couples of pic that day. I know he is supposed to fake but come on, we are talking of his own child, a father has always an eyes on his own kid.
(((Tom)))), I needed that. It does get lonely out here sometimes.
There are plenty of pictures of Jake looking off into the distance in that set. Also telling in my mind is the way Reese is looking off to side in the photo, as if she's trying to avoid giving away that she knows the woman.
They say hindsight it is twenty twenty and I wish I could have had it twenty hours ago. I was reluctant to put up the picture in the park and it had nagged at me. I had gone into edit the pictures a couple of times and waffled about keeping the picture or pulling it.
I know it has already gone out and around, but I feel like I need to take the picture off, even more so after my comments this morning about safety.
Special
anti-secte said...
please tell me this site isn't full of blind Ted fans. If some have still a brain, give me sign
Sorry to say but there is more than Ted now that makes one think BT is real.
don't get it said...
"They got a little too close and Ava did what kids do. They react to stimuli and ava knew the women and child well. And no asst of jakes would take a child of her own at that age to Paris to work. No way."
but Jake completely ignore this kid,you even see him react with ava on others couples of pic that day. I know he is supposed to fake but come on, we are talking of his own child, a father has always an eyes on his own kid.
Jake knew the cameras were on. He is an actor which makes him that much more of an expert. Like someone said Reese looking away is evn more telling.
The real reason you removed it because you don't want to be thought of as batshitcrazy. What safety concerns? You can't see the infant and you can't ID the woman from that pic because she is wearing shades, the PA from 2007 is wearing shades.It could be any blonde woman wearing shades, he could hire yet another blonde PA with shades and have her drive around with him and no one would no the difference.No one is gunning after Ricky Martin's kids, no one is threatning Jake. They may have been death threats against him and Heath when BBM came out but not now. You can go to IHJ and see a series of skinny blondes in different age groups that apperared to be his PA's, it seems that what he likes.
That baby looks no more than 5 months old tops the way the mother is cradling the head, you only do that to a newborn because they don't know how to hold their heads up right. Even though she had the baby trapped top her in a harness, her instinct was to cradle the baby's head.
BTW, the pic is still up on IHJ, has been since day one and the video has been on the splash site since last year. I was lurking on GB last year and they had that video posted.
So there is really no need to "protect" anything especially if his PR allowed the nanny and BT to tag along on a photo-op, the pic appeared in Us weekly and IHJ among other places so clearly they don't care.
What;s fucked up is tht if you look at the IHJ pics, Jake lifts up Ava and Ava is laughing, as she runs off to walk with the nanny.
He did that right in front of them and had the nerve to not even try and walk in another direction, but right behind her, what a sick puppy
How anyone can look at the numerous pictures of Jake picking up Ava and Deacon and being seen out and about with them on vacations, Deacon's birthday, etc. and then justify his hiding his own child is beyond me.
"Jake knew the cameras were on. He is an actor which makes him that much more of an expert. Like someone said Reese looking away is evn more telling."
humm the camera were on the nanny and the babe? PR approve?
"How anyone can look at the numerous pictures of Jake picking up Ava and Deacon and being seen out and about with them on vacations, Deacon's birthday, etc. and then justify his hiding his own child is beyond me."
I's the reason why BT story is absurd or it's saying Jake doesn't love his own child.
If some have still a brain, give me sign
Buzz off.
I'm saying Jake values money and being an A-list star over his own child, otherwise he wouldn't have bearded with Reese and he wouldn't be hiding his own child.
That whole Paris shoot was done for an US Cover story with the headline "Family Vacation." It was pretty rushed for something like that too, came out a day or two after the photos were shot, and, as I believe TR said at the time, to do that the copy would have been written ahead of time, and they just plunked in the photos at the last minute.
In other words, Jake knew what he was doing, and he went along with it. He wanted everyone in the world to know he thought of those kids as if they were his own.
And how convenient that Jake found a beard with kids. I'm sure when they were drawing up those plans at his management's offices that they all told themselves how nobody would believe the rumors about Jake having a kid, because, yes, who in their right minds would do that to their own child.
I'll tell you who: a rich, spoiled, selfish I want to be a big star at any costs actor.
"I'm saying Jake values money and being an A-list star over his own child, otherwise he wouldn't have bearded with Reese and he wouldn't be hiding his own child."
but why having a child then?
How anyone can look at the numerous pictures of Jake picking up Ava and Deacon and being seen out and about with them on vacations, Deacon's birthday...
You should take another look at Paris and Deacon's birthday pictures - everyone looks bored, disconnected, like they don't really want to be there, they are out posing for paparazzi.
"And how convenient that Jake found a beard with kids. I'm sure when they were drawing up those plans at his management's offices that they all told themselves how nobody would believe the rumors about Jake having a kid, because, yes, who in their right minds would do that to their own child."
in others words jake is insane.
I screened saved the previous post SK with the picture of the woman and baby in Paris before you deleted it. I sent it along with comments from here and from WFT2 to Ted, so he has the video and picture and all the other stuff with links to both blogs although he already has that I assume. I'll see what he will do with this if anything.
Do ya'll really think Jake is stupid or careless enough to take his secret kid on a Photo Op outing??? I mean, thats a stretch that I can't make.
It took us 1,5 YEARS to make a connection and we still can't use it to prove anything.
Lots of people have kids and put their work first, and I'm sure they all tell themselves little white lies as to why its okay to do that, or they think their better half will make up for it, or they think having a child will change them, and it doesn't.
You know that mantras.
I'll spend more time with them when they're older.
I need to make a lot of money to buy them a big fancy house and all the toys they want.
I'll be able to send them to the fanciest private schools in town.
My spouse spends time with them, that'll make up for it.
If I just get that promotion I can relax and take more time with the family.
And I'm not talking about families who really do have to do some of these things out of necessity, people who have to work two jobs just to put food on the table, for example. Those people truly have no other choice.
Good evening you all,
I hope everything is ok for you, here the flu is quikly arriving. I pray for my safety lol, I have already a cold which isn't decided to quit me yet so no thanks for the flu.....
I feel excited cause "Brothers" is released soon and in france reviews are mostly positive, far far better than the american ones. They praise the movie of course and specially the performances with a preferance for Jake and natalie' subtil acting!! good news in perspective so.
"Lots of people have kids and put their work first, and I'm sure they all tell themselves little white lies as to why its okay to do that, or they think their better half will make up for it, or they think having a child will change them, and it doesn't."
alas, I have to be agree with you destiny. Some people aren't invested enough is their kids , more involved in work or activities ( often useless)instead. Some parents raise oddly their kids, often without complex risking to loose the sense of priorities.
In jake case I see things differently because he is implicated in such situation and the least we can say not a confortable one. He and Austin have , I think, enough pressure from their entourage and I don't see how they could face the ultimate complication that would be the education of a child. There is a contradiction it seems to me, between being in the most restrictive closet and having a kid. In a sense i's more complication for your career, your credibility and reputation.
I feel excited cause "Brothers" is released soon and in france reviews are mostly positive, far far better than the american ones. They praise the movie of course and specially the performances with a preferance for Jake and natalie' subtil acting!! good news in perspective so.
I can't wait to hear what you think Elinor. I haven't heard from anyone from the UK who's seen it yet. I really want to hear the perspective from outside the US about it.
It sure is a complication!
I don't see how they can continue to hide a child once it gets older, but I also don't see how in the world he could ever come out without looking bad, and making Reese look bad too. I think bearding like that with Reese and hiding his child was almost like a guaranty to the powers that be in HW. If Jake didn't have the balls to not beard, he's probably not going to have the balls to ever come out if he thinks there is the slightest chance it'll make him look bad.
Man, BT is going to be one seriously fucked up teenager.
BT Nanny pics
Reposting what I said over on WFT, where the Nanny pics were posted first.
Seeing all the pictures together like that, clearly the same woman. She even dresses the same in all of them, with deep v-neck shirts showing off her very prominent collar bones.
Sure looks like the same damn two woman to me.
^^ same woman to me
Tom
Same woman in Paris and LA, Eva knows her, Woman walking next to reeses nanny, No women would take her own small baby to paris like that if she was an asst. Oh shit this stuff is geting good.
Plus not to forget. Jake is a jerk and should be ashamed.
bbm films, you're always demanding answers from me and Tom, so answer mine. Why does Jake get to be treated differently? Is his life more valuable than the teenagers dying in the streets because they don't have the money and resources that Jake does to live in a gated community, have a bodyguard when he needs it, etc.
Destiny I'm not demanding an answer from you, I just stated my opinion. In my book Jake does not get to be treated differently. No, absolutely Not, Jake's life is not more valuable than a struggling gay teenage boy or girl. If Jake is gay he has to deal with his own issues of acceptance and believe it or not, his own fears. I will repeat, (his OWN fears). Then deal with it in the spotlight. If I'm not mistaken, You and Tom are older than Jake by some years. Years of experience and the ups and downs and indecisions that someone coming out deals with, and again, not in the spotlight. I can't put myself there, how can you? You don't know what's going on behind closed doors with his career. Maybe some demands from studios, producers, you just (don't know). YOU Don't!
I don't know how it was for you, but every person I know who has come out, it was different for every one of them. All of them came out after 30 or later.
If Jake came out it would be wonderful. As bi or Gay. If he says that he is, I will except it.
If he does not, I will except his answer, but I will think differently in my heart. Done Deal!
This is the problem for me again:
Jake nor Austin has stated that they were gay or bisexual. Until they do, it's still just a rumor. Of course I have my own beliefs just as everyone else here does, but to demand that he stand up and be counted as Gay and show his supposed baby to the world when he has not STATED that he is gay or has a child, is wrong. I'm not gonna get into the show me the evidence. But it's wrong and whoever ((demands)) this needs to take a hard look at themself in my opinion.
There is a guy a work who some believe is gay. He is married with children but has some feminine ways. The word has been out for some times to most people that he is gay. I think so also.
But until I know for sure, or he tells me He is GAY, it's just pure speculation. I think he is gay or bi, does not mean that he is though!
I saw Brothers this past weekend. I went with a lot of prejudices because I’ve seen the original and I thought that this one was an unnecessary remake that would take out what made the original great, but after watching it I believe it’s a decent movie.
I liked Jake’s performance. He was good in a role that at first I thought he was miscast. I thought Tobey was better than expected (I’ve never thought he is a good actor). Tobey and Natalie gave an average performance. Not bad but nothing impressive.
Overall, I think it was a good movie for those who didn’t watch the original. The performances in the original were superior.
The reviews in the UK weren’t very good. 2 or 3 stars out of 5 mostly, with mentions that if you want to watch the movie to go for the original instead.
Jake nor Austin has stated that they were gay or bisexual. Until they do, it's still just a rumor.
1.000 bearding pictures isn't just a rumor.
forgot to say. Destiny, Tom, this is not some school yard fight where one needs to jump in a take up for someone. I am an Adult. I can agree to disagree. When one talks loudly and gets noticed, they should be able to take it and maybe strike back (for a lack or a better term). I don't consider my comments as jumping on Destiny. I just don't know where she, or you can demad that Jake come out. And if he has a child, demand that he comes clean and exposed the child to the world.
And who's benefit would this be for? Yours? I know your answer. It would benefit the gays of the world who need a role model. But one things missing. Jake or Austin would have to admit that they were gay. They have not - YET.
Sorry trolly, we defend our own.
You straight people will never understand us. Ever. And it's because you won't listen. We try and explain how bearding and not coming out are harmful to gay people and still you tell us how we should feel about it. You think you're enlightened but really you're oppressors.
bbm i just read ur comments and they were polite and constuctive. I will not critize what u think but hopefully u are not sad also if so shame on u.
Anon 5:28 is Tom
All I have ever thought about Baby Tile is that it was possible - I don't think any further than that. People have babies by surrogate all the time, more than ever before. Usually, there's more than one embryo as well, the most recent case is Sarah Jessica Parker. It's possible, and I'm going to wait and see before judging or planning any birthday parties. I do think sometimes that the paps and actors work in tandem, and that they would respect an actor's privacy if they were told to. I think that the flurries of pap photos we see are planned by the studios and paps, and the actors are well aware.
I wouldn 't post current pics of children, but I don't see the harm of older pics that are already out in the public domain. For a child's safety, probably it should be kept to a minimum though. In this case, you could barely see the baby in the pic, but, I realize also that the very existence of the baby is in question.
Tom... why do you find it not believable that the assistant would take her child with her while working in paris, but believable that Jake would - #1 take his secret baby to paris and #2 - take it out on a photo op??
Not trying to be ugly. Just curious? S!
I will not critize what u think but hopefully u are not sad also if so shame on u.
Not sad at all Tom
1. While traveling, PAs are paid to take care of their employers, not their babies.
2. Take it out on a photo op - because he wanted to spend some time with BT after the work is done?
Everyone I know personally has pretty much been out since their early 20s or ealier, most of whom did it at a time when it wasn't all that common or as acceptable to be out as it is today.
And no, I don't know what is going on in Jake and Austin's minds. But that doesn't mean I can't judge them. I don't know what goes through the mind of a criminal either, but I'm not going to coddle them and excuse their behavior.
Some situations are just plain wrong. Like going into a jewelry store and shooting and killing a 71year-old store clerk in the middle of a robbery, as just happened today in NYC. I'm sure there are some people who'd say he needs the money, or that it was just an accident, or that he had a rough home life and we can't know what was going through his head when it happened.
I am not one of those people. I think it is just plain wrong to have a child and then hide it because you don't want your closet door to get cracked or shoved wide open, or because you don't want to come out.
I think if someone thinks they are secure enough and mature enough to have a child with their boyfriend, which requires a lot of work and planning if you are a gay man, then there is just no excuse for not having the courage to come out.
If she'd been there working as a personal assistant, and not a nanny, and was really there with her own child, then I would think we'd have a lot more pictures of her, and the child, on the London/Paris trip. We've had other Reekings where the publicist, etc. was along, like at Coachella. No, they didn't want this woman to be seen. It's the only photo she is in.
I would agree that having a child and not being open about it is misguided and wrong, if I knew there actually was a child. I don't put that in the same category as excusing criminal behavior, sorry. The criminal has actually done something, it's up to a court of law to find whether there were any mitigating circumstances, it's not up to me. I don't know anything about whether or not Jake and Austin have a child for sure. I do wonder why he'd take the baby all the way to Paree and not want to hold his own baby. I'd certainly want to be the one holding them if I were out with them. Just an opinion -
You have just officially lost your mind destiny.
Comparing the BT situation to murder.
Lets hope the relatives of the guy that was shot will never have to hear anything like that. Shame on you.
I am a bit perplex really. What do we know about this blond woman? a nanny, an assistant, something else? Where is the certitude this babe is jake's ? I am not convinced at all.
Like i said unless jake or austin express on the issue , nothing makes me believe a babe is involved in all this drama.
sienna said...
Tom... why do you find it not believable that the assistant would take her child with her while working in paris, but believable that Jake would - #1 take his secret baby to paris and #2 - take it out on a photo op??
Not trying to be ugly. Just curious? S!
No offense sienna. Good questions. I just dont think it is practical for a woman with a baby that young to be flying off to France for an extended period of time. If the kid is indeed BT then he is Jakes kid and jake was away for quite some time and he wanted his kid with him. Could this be a photo op with a few mistakes sienna and the pics were taken in France and not as carefully scanned by PR. All possible sienna. Believe me I have been no BT believer but I am sure very very close to being one now. Sienna u saw that video different than i did buddy:-)
Cut the crap, 5:58 PM. Playing stupid doesn't make you look smart.
Not playing stupid, just pointing out that belittling the loss of a life like that is despicable.
Give us a break, 6:10 PM!
Destiny congratulations on your letter being picked by Ted.
Sienna it is not important for me that there be a BT. I just want preferably for Jake to come if not then to be outed .
And no, I don't know what is going on in Jake and Austin's minds. But that doesn't mean I can't judge them. I don't know what goes through the mind of a criminal either, but I'm not going to coddle them and excuse their behavior
Your comments read as if everything that ((you))) think about Jake and Austin is TRUE.
But really, they are your thoughts and, maybe some others share it, but how does that make YOUR thoughts True?
being gay, bearding, a baby or two
Hey, I may believe (some) of this also, but it does not make it True.
And then you seem to chastised them for what (your thoughts) are. hey just saying. Not gonna go further, but that's how I see it.
I don't think there is any reason to demand anything from Jake or Austin. following TT is fun and interesting, but I have to draw the line. If I am wrong and everything you accuse them of is true, I will be the first to say I was wrong, but until then, Ted has just put out some rumors and I believe some of it, and some of it I think is total BS.
Trolly, thanks for a laugh!
Personally, for me, I agree with Tom that I wouldn't take a young baby traveling. But that's just me. To me, it's either a nanny or just a random person with a baby in the video and pics. And if it were me, I'd want to carry my own child - but I'm just an ordinary person, don't know from nannies and wouldn't want one. I think Deacon would have been waaaay too old for a stroller, and probably wouldn't ever want to be in one. Toddlers do get tired little legs, and sometimes parents do put them in a stroller, but Deacon would have a lot more strength and energy. I'm not a Mom myself, but I am an Auntie. JMO, as usual. :)
don't think the murder at the jewlery store was a good example of Jake and Austin's life as you see it. Just don't!
comprehensive reading - F
I think if a person is making a good argument and is polite they dont need to be called trolly. I have no clue who bbm is but she is not being disrespectable to anyone. Let bbm argue. Its fun!
Sorry Tom, bbm films is OMG and WFT/WFT2 resident troll and I'm just fed up with its BS after all this years.
Sorry Tom, bbm films is OMG and WFT/WFT2 resident troll and I'm just fed up with its BS after all this years.
You do know where the door is, don't you. Nobody's asking you to stay!
Don't count on that, trolly.
"Sorry Tom, bbm films is OMG and WFT/WFT2 resident troll and I'm just fed up with its BS after all this years."
no you re just fed up with people who argue with you.
I detest bearding and I think it's wrong to hide a kid, but if this baby in the Paris pic is BT, then they do go outside with the baby and maybe they are out and open in their daily life with family and friends. I think in their case as public figures, making the kid public is a political statement. As much as it sucks that they chose this path, it’s their decision if they are not interested in being publicly out and politically involved in gay rights and expose their kid to the media in this way.
Let her/him talk then. We are all strong minded. Trolls will have no influence or change any of our minds.
Cant call sienna troll because she questiones what I said. Dont think I dont respect your feelings though
sorry.
no you re just fed up with people who argue with you
Are you saying that trolls don't post on OMG and WFT2 all the time?
"Sorry Tom, bbm films is OMG and WFT/WFT2 resident troll and I'm just fed up with its BS after all this years."
no you re just fed up with people who argue with you.
^^ No, His reality is being Crushed
and he can't stand it. So he lashes out. And he calls someone a Troll
What we have is Jake in the vicinity of BT, who is with the nanny. Again, that i something people have used to call Reese a bad mother. But when Jake does it he's being a good dad.
And whay happens when BT is old enough to run and yell daddy??
I think that for Jake to take his child to Paris is one thing - for a PA to take their child is another. If he's on location and away from home for extended periods, he'd want to have his family around him.
A baby that young requires a lot of care and attention, might even be exposed to illnesses and stress of disruptions in routine. I'd wait till they were a little older and could get immunizations if needed, etc. It's not like he's going to miss seeing the Eiffel Tower or something. I'd wait till they were a little older and stronger physically, but that's just me. I'm sure people do it all the time.
Tom... Although i don't believe in BT, i am enjoying the discussion. Someone went to a lot of trouble yesterday to put together a post for me with lots of links to click, and i can certainly see the video through ya'll's eyes. I sent a link to my friend, and she looked at it and agreed that it looked like Ava was approaching the mystery woman. To me, it just looks like she's flipping her hair and it appears that she's touching her, when in reality, she doesn't. I don't understand the woman not looking down at her if she did, in fact, touch her.
As for taking his assistant with her baby, i don't see that as being an odd thing at all. If she could go and do the work and take her kid and get a trip to paris out of it, why not? I'm sure they had baby sitting at the hotel for when she needed to do other things.
But it does seem odd that she's not in any other pictures if she's really with them, which makes me still doubt she's really with them. If she was, it seems like she'd be in the periphary of some of the other pictures. The woman in paris does look a lot like the assistant, but she looks like a very washed out, beat-down, version of her. In all the other pictures, she's tanned and wearing make-up. It strikes me as strange that she looks so worn out in this pic.
I'm enjoying the discussion. It's quite a conundrum. S!
Jake was working on PoP for 6 months, so waiting till the baby is a little older would mean missing precious time.
I guess what I was saying is that if it is BT in the pics and vids, the woman is probably the nanny and not a PA. I wouldn't want to leave my baby at the hotel like a sack of potatoes! Especially that young, you're still in a mesmerized state of awe. :)
At first I wondered about Ava running up to the woman and felt it must be someone she knew, because famous people must be even more wary of strangers than ordinary people, but it could be that Ava just loves cute little babies, and ran up to the woman without thinking, and the fact that it was a woman with a child, and the BG and entourage was there as well, maybe they didn't feel it was such a danger. Children are naturally curious and love other children, especially babies, pets, etc.
If she could go and do the work and take her kid and get a trip to paris out of it, why not? I'm sure they had baby sitting at the hotel for when she needed to do other things.
That doesn't make any sense, there are other PAs who could work and travel with Jake, and who don't have small babies.
Yes, I agree Paris - you wouldn't want to miss precious time with your baby.
The woman in paris does look a lot like the assistant, but she looks like a very washed out, beat-down, version of her.
Sorry nanny!
ITA MKT
Nah...
actually, it makes a lot of sense, if you are a celebrity living 10 kinds of secret life, to take your own trusted assistant, with her baby, over someone you don't know from Eve.
s.
Maybe he has more than one trusted assistant, would make sense.
Jake is living 10 kinds of secret life ALL the time, all this years, in LA and in Paris, and he can trust all his assistants (and there are confidentiality agreements).
can I ask you sienna how do you explain the bodyquard clearly up near the woman to her right and reese asst or nanny directly on her left.
Sorry anon 8:02 pm is tom
PLEASE STOP POSTING. There were 6 comments last I was here now there's 93. At least wait until I can catch up!
People in my office regularly travel on business. They never ever take their children with them, even the women with infants.
I've seen kids run up to dogs, and kids go up to other kids on the playground, but I have never seen a kid run up to a stranger carrying a baby, particularly walking like that. I would imagine too that stars take even more care than most people to warn their kids about running up to strangers.
President Obama to call for 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' repeal, adviser says
CNN
Re: taking the baby, if it was the assistants... I'm not saying that is what would happen on an everyday basis in regular corporate america. i'm just saying that i can see it happening in a situ like this, where she has a specific function to fill - maybe office work or reading scripts or who knows wtfe all he has people doing for him - i can see how he might bring her and the baby along if they are going to be in a nice hotel for a while, etc.
on the other hand, i can still see how she's just a blond woman strolling by with her baby who happens to look a lot like his regular assistant.
i do NOT see how he would take his top secret kid out on a photo op. that is the option that makes the very least sense to me, and the fact that the other folks in the entourage walked up close to her, inviting photos of her, is not believable either. Ava yes, but not the lady in the white pants. She would know better.
of any scenario we can come up with, him taking his baby that he has obviously gone to great lengths to keep hidden, out into the public, into a planned photo op situation, just doesn't jive for me. now maybe he did - i'm not going to jump up and down and say that's not his baby, but he's really a lot dumber than we gave him credit for if he did.
TOM... i don't think i've seen a pic where all 3 of them are together. i've seen the one where the known assistant is walking next to the suspected nanny and ava rushes up, but i haven't seen one with assis, nanny and bg. is there one??
Sienna I beleve the BG is walking up in front near the blonde lady but more in front of reeke than her. Somebody correct me if i am wrong.
OK< don't throw any tomatoes at me please. i'm just here for the debate, but:
someone posted a 4/pic of the blonde - 3 of the assistant and 1 of the nanny/mystery lady.
the tip of the mystery lady's nose is different from the other woman's. she looks like a reverse nose job - very smooth in the 3 other pics, but round and imperfect in the nanny pic. also, i don't buy that a woman so obviously into her appearance as his known assistant is, would go out looking like that - no make-up, run down. also, what happened to her tan?
i think it's a very sim looking woman, but i'm not sure i think it's the same one. go look at her nose real close (yes, we are officially insane) and see what you think. and be honest!!! =D
tom, in the video, there at the end, the bg is back with r/j, and the assistant has walked ahead and ava rushes up to her and i'm not sure where deacon is.
go look at her nose real close (yes, we are officially insane) and see what you think
Same nose, same tip, different angle
what happened to her tan?
Pictures are from June 2007 and July 2008.
there are two bg's
Destiny, I agree with you on how Ava is reacting.
I've had a long, long day at work and I'm just too worn out to go through all of this tonight (especially after being on the phone with my buddy Florida Tom as we hashed over everything already, lol).
I don't need to argue back & forth about it anyway. I see what I see.
Whether it's to our way of thinking how Jake & Austin raise BT or not, that's not my issue right now.
I think WFT2 detectives broke out major stuff two nights ago reaffirming what Special has been saying all along.
I don't have any problem with someone not believing in BT. What has turned me off officially are the ones who are so persistent in insisting and arguing how BT cannot exist on both sites.
I'm not going to get caught up in arguing that point because I'm past that.
Destiny, sorry I wasn't around during the day today. I had time @ lunch today to lurk but that was it. We're all wrapped up in our new whse system at work and man, it's a huge pain. Special, I'm sorry too I wasn't around to hook arms. I agree with alot of what you said, Destiny. And I agree with Special taking the picture down. No, I don't like that J&A are hiding their baby, but I'm not going to criticize it because it's their decision, their baby. All I want is for them to be happy and for the baby to be safe. That's it.
And now, I need to go put a new chapter up.
Sienna I am not sure but I think I saw two different videos. You may be looking at the one I did not. The first video I saw does not have the gap in time and you can see Ava from directly in front and not from the side. I cant find the one i saw first but it is def diff fro the one I think you saw.
Were there two cameras filming?
there are two bg's
Black guy and ...?
I think it is unimaginably selfish and cruel to go out of your way to obtain a child only to raise it some sort of freaky "Flowers in the Attic" situation.
There is a band called The Academy Is that has been around for a few years but they aren't mainstream/top 40. They had a song that got decdent airplay called "About A Girl" and the lead singer was part of the "Snakes On A Plane" song. Anyway they aren't mainstream like I said but they have a dedicated fanbase and following and get a lot of press in magazines like Alternative Press, etc...
Why am I bringing this up? Well there were a lot of rumors about the lead singer William Beckett having a daughter. He has a girlfriend since high school and some fans happened to find a church bulletin online announcing the birth of a daughter. Church bulletin disappeared off the website. The fans continued talking about William's possible baby and even asked on live radio if he had a child. He said that they were crazy rumors and that was "wikipedia nonsense."
Now the child is about two and William did an interview a few months ago where he confirmed that he really did have a daughter. He said he wanted to keep her out of the spotlight and protect his family.
So I guess I could see how someone like Jake or Austin, who are much more well known, could decide to keep their child out of the spotlight, especially with all the crazy paps around. Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz have said that their son is TERRIFIED of flashing lights and the paps.
Link to a scan of the interview where he confirms he has a daughter.
I saw Brothers this past weekend. I went with a lot of prejudices because I’ve seen the original and I thought that this one was an unnecessary remake that would take out what made the original great, but after watching it I believe it’s a decent movie.
I liked Jake’s performance. He was good in a role that at first I thought he was miscast.
Thanks Brothers. I think a lot of people couldn't picture Jake in the role of Tommy but after seeing come away impressed with what he did with it.
MKT, very well put. You struck on my sentiments.
Uh oh we better report Jake to California Dept of Family and Child Services and the police. How dare he not talk about the baby and parade it in public. That's selfish and cruel, pure child abuse plain and simple. He needs to be exposed and punished for this unspeakable atrocious act.
If Jake supposedly had his child out and about in Paris, how is that hiding it? How do we know that a child, if there is one, is being hidden? I don't understand the logic here. Also, we've been talking about the existence of a BT for years, and suddenly people are worried about "safety"? No. 1, we don't even know that there is a child for certain. That picture is from Paris, and from months ago - how does it pose a threat to a child who may or may not exist? That pic probably bears no resemblance to the child now. You can't even see the child that much. Why do a post on BT in the first place then? I know in retrospect, it was thought to be a bad idea. If a picture and post is up, you can't expect people not to look at it or talk about it. I believe that a baby is possible, but much beyond that, I don't know.
Sorry that you had such a long day PG, hope tomorrow is better.
Did William Becket pretend that someone else was his girlfriend for the cameras?
Did he play with that faux girlfriend's children for the cameras, and make his fans believe he wanted to be a step-dad to those kids?
Did he go on numerous vacations with his faux family, to Mexico, London, Paris?
Did he participate in endless photos shoots with his faux girlfriend, and did she talk about him in magazine interviews?
Is he someone who is so recognizable, and so photographed by the paps, that he never went anywhere with his real family?
Personally I think he sounds a little self-important and delusional.
Ooh, talking of musicians made me think of something else. Eddie Vedder. For years he had a woman who was stalking him, threatening him, making his life pretty miserable, to the point where he in fact wouldn't go out and do things. Even ruined his relationship of many years because his girlfriend couldn't take it.
But you know what? He has a new girlfriend, and a beautiful red-headed daughter that there have been pictures of and that he talks about in interviews, how much he loves her, how much she means to him. And I believe that since that last interviews I've read he's had a second child too. Here is someone who had every reason to be keep his life private, and he realized that was no way to live, and no way to treat his kids and his new girlfriend. He talked about this at length in a Rolling Stone interview a few years back.
And even this Becket guy has apparently realized that you can't do that either.
Just to clarity, what his former girlfriend couldn't take was not the stalking and threats, but the way Vedder shut himself off from life in reaction to it.
Personally I think he sounds a little self-important and delusional.
You should know.
after much discussion with my associate!!, i must agree that the mystery woman with the baby and the pa in la seem to be the same person. altho, in paris, she does seem to have had the life sucked right out of her, so whosever baby that is, it must be wearing her out. i'm still on the fence about what i think about the baby, other than that he def looks younger than 11 months, and he looks like a cutie.
s.
I don't know anything about Jake and Reese and any children to be sure enough to make any judgements about them. The truth will come out in time, I am sure. All I know is that there certainly is room to question - but beyond that, I don't know. I'm going on what Ted says, but that doesn't mean I believe him 100%.
To be honest, I couldn't care less about celebrity children, other than an "aren't they adorable" moment in passing if I see a picture of one in a magazine or on a blog, or an "isn't that nice" like when I heard that J&A might have a child of their own. That's it. As I and some others have said, I'm sure if there are children, that it will become public eventually. Until then, if they don't want to share that information with the general public because they want to give the child as normal a life as they can, that's their business. I don't want to assume the worst about anyone.
I must have missed something, but to me, posting pics of a child who may or may not exist, and then implying that those who look at it are potential "stalkers" just blows my mind. Putting up an inflammatory post and then trying to sway the conversation to one of Jake's latest films just blows my mind. We could have put up a post about Brothers from the start. All of the blogs are obsessive - you've got the JiG/BT'ers on the on the one hand - then you've got the Babblers on the other hand having a coronary if Jake doesn't get an Oscar every year for every performance he does and downgrading every other actors' performance as if whay they think carries any weight at all, or if you don't find his interviews absolutely the most incredible and profound things you've ever heard a human being utter. It's too much - I'm done with all of this crap.
I totally buy that Jake took Baby Tile to Europe despite the risk of being seen. Why? Because at one point in the POP filming, it was reported by someone on set that Jake broke down crying because "Reese's kids" were supposed to come for a visit and the visit was canceled. That story sounded like total bullshit to me, but not the Jake crying part. Jake has admitted in interviews to crying on set at various times himself. So why was he crying. I see no great closeness in any pics of him and AVA/Deacon to warrant tears if he never sees them again. So when I read that story, I immediately thought it was his child who's visit was canceled or postponed. Now I am more sure than ever that Daddy missed his baby and was upset, moved to tears even, that he did not come to visit.
Great that an OMG letter got on Ted's column again. We must have a record by now. Ted or an assistant must be reading OMG and WFT2 every day as he stays on topic.
she does seem to have had the life sucked right out of her
Well of course. She was spending time with Reese.
The horse was kinda weird???
Atticus wanted me to get him a new French blow-up horse. His old one wore out.
"Ted or an assistant must be reading OMG and WFT2 every day as he stays on topic."
on this point we are agree.
And whay happens when BT is old enough to run and yell daddy??
Hope there's someone with a vid and their microphone is turned up full blast nearby
French blow-up horse
No wonder we never see Atticus out anymore. He's busy!
in paris, she does seem to have had the life sucked right out of her, so whosever baby that is, it must be wearing her out
(((Nanny)))
Ted or an assistant must be reading OMG and WFT2 every day as he stays on topic.
Not telling peeps what they can and cannot say, but just a heads up: there have been hints dropped around the traps that a list of "stalkers" is being compiled by J's management - ie targeting posters who are perpetuating the "myth".
The real reason is to try and stop/scare off current speculation.
there have been hints dropped around the traps that a list of "stalkers" is being compiled by J's management - ie targeting posters who are perpetuating the "myth".
LOL. What a bunch of bullshit.
4:51 Troll alert
Dear Police:
Some fans on Jake Gyllenhaal blogs are gossiping about the possibility that Jake has a baby. They've even posted links to old pictures and one (1) video all taken of Jake in public by paparazzi and discussed them in detail. The posters names are Special K, destiny, Prairiegirl, Florida Tom and Anonymous, to name a few. Please arrest them for stalking.
Yours truly,
Jake's management
cc: FBI/CIA/Homeland Security
No, I don't think that is bs. I can easily see it happening and it wouldn't surprise me. In fact, I bet we've already seen some of these people. And they'll just come across as a troll. Take Mantra's statement for instance. Very typical of how a trollish comment often starts. I've been on here for over 2 years now and I clearly see the trend, although it's taken me that long.
They start off by coming on here, pretending to be "on the fence", "curious", "wondering", "not sure". And I'm not criticizing that part but with them, that's just the start. Then they'll start asking questions, all in a nice tone of voice. They'll converse. Ask other posters questions.
Then, all of a sudden, their next comment will be laced with one little jab. One little insult. One dig. They'll reveal themselves because they can't help it. They just can't resist. And then their comment will frequently end with "I'm done with this". "I'm through with all of this crap." "You people are nuts." "I've got better things to do." "You guys need to get a life." Take your pick from the buffet of lines and there's a list of other alternative endings but space is limited.
A troll does not need to be rude or abusive to be a troll.
Personally I think he sounds a little self-important and delusional.
^^ Did you just make that comment Destiny? NO you didn't.
^^
There was nothing wrong with the original post today. There was nothing new about the picture; as someone said, it's available on IHJ for all to see.
And why would it have not been pulled?
If that is Baby T, why would it have been allowed to stay up? That's some people's argument.
This is just a theory. I can see this nanny & baby T accidentally getting in a few pictures for whatever reason. At the time that this trip happened and these pictures went up, no one but practically Special & Stubborn were believing in BT. Probably a few others that I just don't know about. Me? Probably on that shaky fence at the time, lol.
No one was believing in BT. Everyone was totally focused on Reeke. And the kids. And being upset about Jake with Ava & Deacon. No one was even remotely thinking of BT. So what was the harm in leaving that picture up? Who else studies these pictures like bacteria in a petri dish? Nobody paid any attention whatsoever.
Plus, most people couldn't stand to look at those things anyway; I know I certainly wasn't going back to gaze upon them. GAG. Long forgotten now. Reeke is over. Why go back?
Not to mention that revealing video which is on a website that I never even knew about.
Well, now that the stroller was spotted, someone went back. And started to look a little closer. And yeah, now those pictures, that video are both exposing very interesting things. And make us all look at other things just a little closer.
And yeah, now PR could say it could have been a mistake to have let them go. Who's to say they just didn't think anyone would ever notice? That was what, a year ago? Who would ever think to go back a year ago to study these pictures?
But now we know.
The real reason is to try and stop/scare off current speculation.
I say go for it Jake. There are a lot of loonies out there that know it all and everything about a celeb, or so they think in their minds. This includes someone (they don't know) or have no idea (what's going on in their life). They take fun speculation and run with it then get angry about someone elses life. The nerve of some people. Then they start tearing the person down simply because they are obsessed and have no life of their own. Most of the people posting here have absolutely no interest in Jake as an Actor. NONE If the guy has a baby and is gay, So what. All of you gays need to have a baby of your own, then you would not have so much time trying to tear someone down, just because you can, because they are not doing what you want or expect them to do to please you. GET A Life
Call the Police on Ted while your at it Jake.
The most damning evidence are the photos of the blonde assistant in LA and in Paris. They are definitely the same person.
That alone would not convince me that there is a BT, but the video of Ava running up to the same blond lady holding the baby, as if Ava knew her or atleast very familiar with her, is the SLAM DUNK for this former non-believer!
Prairiegirl I think you missed the point. "grapevine" is trying to scare posters into silence by saying that anyone who believes in BT, is considered a stalker:
a list of "stalkers" is being compiled by J's management - ie targeting posters who are perpetuating the "myth".
Since when did gossiping and discussing become stalking?! What are we going to be arrested for, talking about a celeb who might have a baby?! "grapevine" is full of shit. It's just another lame troll tactic, telling posters they're going on a list if they continue their discussion.
Since when did gossiping and discussing become stalking?!
Since trolls need to come up with new bullshit to post!
All of you gays need to have a baby of your own, then you would not have so much time trying to tear someone down, just because you can, because they are not doing what you want or expect them to do to please you. GET A Life
WOW. This is a change from the norm - a haus frau who thinks J is str8.
Please post again soon hausy
It's just another lame troll tactic, telling posters they're going on a list if they continue their discussion.
Trolly did the same before.
...There are a lot of loonies out there that know it all and everything about a celeb, or so they think in their minds. This includes someone (they don't know) or have no idea (what's going on in their life).
You mean like PassingBy?
Prairiegirl is more clued on than the rest of the posters give her credit for.
Awwwww my French blow up doll back when it was shiny and new...and clean.
Prairiegirl is more clued on than the rest of the posters give her credit for.
LOL, sucking up to Prairiegirl isn't going to make you less of a troll.
LOL. How about you instead.
A troll does not need to be rude or abusive to be a troll.
So what makes a troll then? Someone who questions the prevailing "wisdom" I guess. We have the regular posters making jabs and digs constantly, but that's OK. There are plenty of posts that jab and namecall here, and the only ones PG questions are the ones who dare to say the Emperor has no baby clothes.
So what makes a troll then?
Read PG's post, try to use your head and stop playing stupid.
If some are so sure to have found "the real evidence" then they can contact mainstream mags.
Geez, things got a bit heated around here overnight! I'm not sure if this child exists or not, all I was saying was why was that post put up. I'm not a babbler or JiS card-carrying member. We can agree to disagree about the baby speculation. Prarire girl, I don't know why you think I am part of PR or a troll. I think you make a lot of sense, and have a balanced view of things. Anyway, that's just my 2 cents worth.
If some are so sure to have found "the real evidence" then they can contact mainstream mags.
Why would anyone do that?
The information has already been sent to the NE, Star, etc. Already.
PG: The video has been available for awhile, it was posted on GB blog last year, that's where I first saw it.
The pony in the pic with the stroller belongs to Ava. I remember the Us story that went along with the puc and said that they bought her the pony at some Paris store, so they had to make sure there was a pic of the pony. The pony and stroller appear in the same pic and the pic of Jake and Reese walking behind the woman and the baby appeared in Us.
All PR approved pics, so there was no conceren nor did they slip up.
to see the reactions!
"The information has already been sent to the NE, Star, etc. Already."
ok, let's wait then.
PG: The video has been available for awhile, it was posted on GB blog last year, that's where I first saw it.
We saw that video before, but, as PG said very clearly, no one was looking for BT at the time.
... the pic of Jake and Reese walking behind the woman and the baby appeared in Us. All PR approved pics, so there was no conceren nor did they slip up.
Picture of Jake, Reese, the woman and the baby DID NOT appear in Us Weekly, here are the scans:
Us Reekly scans
I think it's wrong to send this info to gossip mags. This was a troll for sure trying to make OMG and WFT2 look bad.
However, no magazine will publish this because they work with the PR approved line.
Only a foreign tabloid (like "news of the world" for example that goes searching for scandal) would pursue the story but nobody will believe it anyway. At most, it'll result in another story dismissing the rumors like the enquirer did in the past.
That was not me posting above, but I pretty much agree with them, so what the hell.
PG, I was not making jabs at anyone. People here pretty much self-admit they are obsessive over this subject to some degree, myself included. Also, people get fed up and take a break sometimes, it doesn't make them a troll if they say they are going to leave. And if you are defending the Babblers, you are a very magnanimous person. Too bad they won't appreciate it.
Only a foreign tabloid (like "news of the world" for example that goes searching for scandal) would pursue the story but nobody will believe it anyway.
Nobody believed it when BT story was published on the Internet few years ago (Jonathan Jaxon).
Picture of Jake, Reese, the woman and the baby DID NOT appear in Us Weekly, here are the scans
Troll and a liar.
August 27, 2007
Jake Gyllenhaal is Gay and Having a Baby
Former Hollywood publicist Jonathan Jaxson says that Jake Gyllenhaal is planning to come out some time by the end of next month. Jake is reportedly ready to come out because he and his boyfriend of several years (rumored to be actor Austin Nichols or Chef Chris Fischer) are expecting a baby in September.
Jake Gyllenhaal has been dating the same guy for years. Last year Jake and his bf were arrested and brought into the West Hollywood station after the sheriffs office was called after catching Jake and his bf having sex in an SUV behind the restaurant Chin Chins in LA. Both were later released. Jake has been dating this guy for years, even before he broke up with Kirsten Dunst. Kirsten Dunst found out about his bf and confronted him at Chateau Marmont. The confrontation was loud and they broke up right there. News of their break-up followed a few days later. Jake and his bf are currently expecting a baby through a surrogate. They used a company based in Westwood, CA. The baby is due in September."
This is a malicious lie, because there's no way Jake Gyllenhaal is gay. He's an A-list actor who's dated a ton Hollywood actresses. They just never take pictures together. And they're never seen together. When he's not with beautiful women, he just hangs out with his totally heterosexual friends and does stuff like shopping and talking long walks on the beach. You know, regular guy stuff.
www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com
PR was aware of the pic of the woman on IHJ and the video on GB as well as the source of the video: Splash. They just don't monitor this blog. They would have made sure that the Splash video never saw the light of day and would have made IHJ take it down.
Did you here the cameras going off in that video? Tons, from several angles making sure they got everything, yeah PR didn't know or see anything, LOL!! It was made do look disorganized and casual but it wasn't.
The JAxson story got NE interested because he had contacts there, we will see what they will do with this.
PS: Didn't Ian Halperin investigate BT and said that it was BS?
The JAxson story got NE interested because he had contacts there...
... so they published the story about Jake's PR denying gay rumors.
JAKE GYLLENHAAL HITS THE ROOF OVER LATEST GAY RUMOR
Baby claim last straw for ‘Brokeback’ star
“Brokeback Mountain” star Jake Gyllenhaal is fuming over Internet rumors that he’s gay and having a child with his male lover!
The hunky screen star – who played Heath Ledger’s homosexual lover in the controversial Oscar-winning film – says he had enough with the anonymous Web site jabs that he’s more than just buddies with actor Austin Nichols.
“Jake’s been a good sport over gay rumors – up till now,” a source close to the 26-year-old star told The ENQUIRER.
He even went as far as spoofing himself when he hosted “Saturday Night Live.” He mugged for a crowd of “gay cowboys” planted in the audience and also did a dead-on impression of Jennifer Holliday singing “And I Am Telling You” dressed in drag!
Jake – who’s dated “Spider-Man” beauty Kirsten Dunst and Natalie Portman of “Star Wars” – has always been the first to laugh at the Hollywood gay buzz because he’s straight, the source said.
But he stopped laughing when an Aug. 28 story on the celebrity Web site Jossip carried the headline: “Jake Gyllenhaal is gay and having a baby!”
That report was picked up from an obscure Web site called IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com – which linked him to Nichols, star of the HBO series “John from Cincinnati.”
The site quoted an unnamed “former Hollywood publicist” claiming: “Jake Gyllenhaal is planning to come out some time by the end of next month…He and his boyfriend of several years, rumored to be actor Austin Nichols, are expecting a baby in September.”
The site ran a photo of longtime pals Jake and Austin sitting together and laughing at a basketball game.
“Jake has been dating this guy for years, even before he broke up with Kirsten Dunst,” according to the IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com report.
“Kirsten found out about his bf and confronted him at Chateau Marmont. The confrontation was loud and they broke up right there. News of their breakup followed a few days later.
“Jake and his bf are currently expecting a baby through a surrogate. They used a company based in Westwood, Calif. The baby is due in September.”
The story – which pals swear is pure fiction – incensed Jake.
“There were all kinds of rumors that Jake was gay after ‘Brokeback Mountain.’ Apparently, some people don’t realize that he was just acting,” another pal told The ENQUIRER."
"The JAxson story got NE interested because he had contacts there, we will see what they will do with this."
NE didn't investigate themselves?
I don't think PR knew what was in those pictures and video until they appeared, and then what were they going to do? They knew if they pulled them it would only attact attention, and they knew there'd be people who'd saved them and would start examining them.
Remember all the fuss when one of those Jaustin Borders pictures disappeared?
No, better to hope nobody notices.
NE didn't investigate themselves?
They called Jake's PR.
NE may have investigated and couldn't find anything. So they ran with a story that got all the details out there, with a denial. Probably their way of saying its true.
"NE may have investigated and couldn't find anything. So they ran with a story that got all the details out there, with a denial. Probably their way of saying its true."
it's likely because they found nothing they added the denial.
Didn't Ian Halperin investigate and say it wasn't true?
NE has a pretty good track record and I'm sure they investigated. Jaxzon put them on the story not only by posting it on his blog and getting it out there, since he had contacts on NE he probably said that he had good sources, etc.
right after jaxon himself said the story was bullshit nobody remenber?
NE has a pretty good track record and I'm sure they investigated.
It is obvious that NE did NOT investigate. Or they did and decided not to print it.
right after jaxon himself said the story was bullshit nobody remenber?
Why would anyone care what Jaxon said?!? He just used Ted's gossip to make some money.
Didn't Ian Halperin investigate and say it wasn't true?
No, he didn't.
NE lost all their credibility since they were bought by Star. They publish everything PR approved. Investigated or not, they had to go with 'Jake is straight'. Just this week they have a BS story about the big romance of Jake with Jen Aniston.
I didn't know NE had sold out. That's a shame, there should be one publication that isn't beholden to PR.
"Didn't Ian Halperin investigate and say it wasn't true?
No, he didn't."
Ian halperin is sure jake had sex with men but never claimed jaustin as a couple and the existence of a babe.
"I didn't know NE had sold out. That's a shame, there should be one publication that isn't beholden to PR."
but the story sound ridiculous.
Having a baby is ridiculous?
"That's a shame, there should be one publication that isn't beholden to PR."
why no blog is talking about it then?
"Having a baby is ridiculous?"
publishing " jake gyllenhaal and his boyfriend having a babe" yes it's ridiculous and jaxon behaviour after is telling.
Talk about what, Simple?
BTW, blogs did talk about Jake Gyllenhaal is Gay and Having a Baby story from 2007.
I get emails from the Courage Campaign that is working on the repeal of DADT. They sent one around this morning written by Lt. Choi. He ended it with this beautiful line:
And I'm not going to hide my love. Love is worth it.
Yes the blogs tslked about it in 2007, talked about how rediculous it was. When Jaxson did a follow up on the actual birth of BT in Oct. 2007, he was ignored.
NE didn't sell out, this is the same rag that nailed Edwards, someone more important than Bubble boy.
publishing " jake gyllenhaal and his boyfriend having a babe" yes it's ridiculous and jaxon behaviour after is telling
There is nothing ridiculous about that title - it looks like the title was true.
Jonathan Jaxon just used Ted's gossip to get publicity, his behaviour is totally irrelevant.
Yes the blogs tslked about it in 2007, talked about how rediculous it was.
Yes, the same blogs that talked about Reeke as a real couple. LMAO!
With politicians NE doesn't have to worry about pissing off PR that will cut off access to other clients.
"NE didn't sell out, this is the same rag that nailed Edwards, someone more important than Bubble boy."
NE pushed Reeke non-stop with tons of stories about their engagements and marriage plans, and linked Jake with Anne, Jen Aniston, models, etc etc since the Reeke 'break up'. They follow the PR approved line.
"There is nothing ridiculous about that title - it looks like the title was true"
no no nothing ridiculous....except nobody believe it.
"Yes the blogs tslked about it in 2007, talked about how rediculous it was. When Jaxson did a follow up on the actual birth of BT in Oct. 2007, he was ignored"
Jaxon said after his investigation, the baby story was bullshit.
"Yes, the same blogs that talked about Reeke as a real couple. LMAO!"
by curiosity ask Dlisted or Crazy days and night if they really believe in BT.
Jaxon's "investigation" was calling Perez Hilton and Austin's father. It was lame. That is not research.
no no nothing ridiculous....except nobody believe it.
That was September 2007 and we are talking about people who believed that Reeke were hiding their "hot romance".
Isn't it weird Jaxon plagied TED but asked hilton to know if it's true? why he ddin't ask Ted directly?
Ask what?!? Ted, can I please steal your story?
"That was September 2007 and we are talking about people who believed that Reeke were hiding their "hot romance"."
oh please the toothy saga was in full force. BT rumour was just too much.
More about the big romance, please.
Tabloid fiction of the week said...
They don’t even check coherence in their fiction before going to print. Jake is linked to 3 different actresses and 4 models in just one magazine LOL!
British Enquirer has Jake on the cover with Jennifer Aniston and Gerard Butler. It’s about “Jen’s wild romps with the two hunks to prove she is sexier than Angelina”. The article explains how she flirted with both in one weekend at the Golden Globes’ parties. It says that Jen knows that from the two, the most serious prospect for a relationship is Jake. Jake has been texting Jen to go on a date with him and she doesn’t mind being his ‘cougar’. It says they’ve always have chemistry but the timing never was right as one of the two was in a relationship and that Jen thinks he could be good for her because he is a ‘nice guy’ that can take care of her, he is an acclaimed actor that can’t harm her career and he has everything she likes about John Mayer but he is stable and her friends think ‘they are perfect for each other’.
The same magazine has another blurb about Jake wanting Reese back. It says that after he flirted with Anne Hathaway during the filming of LAOD, he now thinks the Chin is his ‘soulmate’ and ‘the woman he wants to spend the rest of his life with’. But Reese has moved on now and it’s doubtful they’ll reconcile.
It also has the story about Sean Penn and Tobey Maguire introducing 4 models to Jake at a party but they had to carry the conversation because Jake was too shy.
"That was September 2007 and we are talking about people who believed that Reeke were hiding their "hot romance"."
oh please the toothy saga was in full force
It wasn't. September 2007 was few weeks after first two Reeke photo ops and reeking in Toronto.
I talked about people who followed toothy saga.Iremembe comments from JJ blog of those who believed jake may be gay but thought this bs discredited the whole thing. I don't even talk about the JIS defenders who came to insult JJ.
Someone is clearly having a conversation with themselves. Meltdown? Trying to discourage people from reading all the evidence about BT?
Ain't going to work.
Post a Comment