Destiny hit the nail on the head - "One thing jumped out at me in that sighting with Chelsea. The blogger says 'They were not on a date, unless those other two guys at the table were Secret Service agents. ' I guess that means the other two guys at the table were Jake and Chelsea's dates."
"Jake Gyllenhaal and Chelsea Clinton had dinner together last night at Milos Estatoria, the groovy Greek restaurant on West 55th Street in Manhattan. They were not on a date, unless those other two guys at the table were Secret Service agents. "
That would have been October 17th, the day before Ted's column about Jake and Austin's "dead ringer" enjoying a walk in The Village.
Who better to do a double date with than the former President's daughter. Talk about a someone knowing how to handle classified information.
Huffington Post - Pamela Redmond Satran - Dinner at Milos Estatoria
BTW: Pamela Redmond Satran is a fiction writer, freelance journalist,former section editor for Glamour, and contributer to the Huffington Report.
78 comments:
Wasn't there also a Gawker or Defamer sighting in NY at that same time of Jake with "a tall lanky gent" who had a bicycle? Was that at a restaurant or somewhere else?
I think there was on Gawker.
I love it when we get all the borders of the puzzle in place and then the middle bits start to fit. :) We're becoming awfully savvy these days. Well, the rest of you are, I just sit back and smile contentedly most of the time, lol.
Total squee at that picture..they look like they're...yeah...thank you, special. I never noticed before, Austin is smoking there?
Interesting news! I love that the writer says Jake looks like a cross between the cutest guy in high school and a werewolf! lol... i wish she gave us more description of the other two gents dining with them though. But yeah, it could very much likely to be Austin, I'd believe.
Again, that's only a week before the whole Jeese PDA started? something's cooking and some harsh decisions have been made, i guess.
love the pictures there. both of them looks so dashingly handome. thanks!
Gawker Stalker - Jake Gyllenhaal
Freeman Alley
Oct 16th, 2007 @ 10pm
Saw Jakey-Poo at Freeman's this evening. Dining with a skinny gent and a mousey female. Looked adorable in his poo brown t-shirt and beard. Left around 11ish with black, suited security dude, douchey skinny gent friend had a bike. Lame, but Jakey looked delicious.
http://gawker.com/stalker/?refId=579211
Wicked you need to revise the post. You have "I guess the other two guys were Jake and Chelsea's date"in quotes implying that the person that reported the sighting 2 months ago said it which is false. "Destiny" said that in the previous post, so she should be credited, it's not part of the story.
BTW: It's obvious that this was lifted from one of the Jake/Jake & Reese blog and that "waiter" was lurking there last night. It's not the st time you have purposely posted misleading info, why? Well we all know why. You also cherry pick the stuff you gleam because there were a few things out there that were never reposted here.
I wonder who Jake and Reese will support in the upcoming election?
Laura Jean (aka uber-Reese fan).
Things you have got wrong:
1. This is a post by Special K, not Wicked.
2. A quote from this post clearly mentions Destiny, who in turn quites the original blogger: "Destiny hit the nail on the head - "One thing jumped out at me in that sighting with Chelsea. The blogger says 'They were not on a date, unless those other two guys at the table were Secret Service agents. ' I guess that means the other two guys at the table were Jake and Chelsea's dates."
If you are so sure of Jake and Reese, Laura Jean, why do you care if Jake sees a friend (i.e. Austin)? Why try to disprove it?
One
I posted it and Wicked didn't.
Two
The first quote is directly from the Pamela Redmond Satran. The second the entire quote from Destiny -- I did put the interior quotations in because that is what you do when there is a quote with in a quote.
Three
Why would a freelance journalist who has is contributor to a well known blog lift something from a rinky dink Gyllenspoon blog?
Wow, this is just great! That totally went over my head. I loved the writer's description of Jake too, Winterbird. Hot! ;)
those shoes pinching Laura Jean
I just hope Reese doesn't turn him Republican on us! ;)
The "skinny gent" on a bicycle rings a bell for me more than the dinner with Chelsea - just because the other two guys could be anybody with the lack of description. Skinny gent def sounds like Austin.
(Tinhat, sending out good wishes to you.)
SK: You are dissembling.If you are going to put in interior quotes , you need to credit the source for THAT quote, which was Destiny not Ms. Satron nor the eyewitness.
And I didn't say that Ms. Satran lifted anything from a fan blog. Obviously the person came across this sometime yesterday and posted it in their blog and a reader here that was obviously lurking saw it and made you aware of it. There is no way they just happened to find it moments after it was found elsewhere.
This sighting and post is 2 months old and went undisovered until the owner of the blog found it. As a frequent reader of the Huffington blog I have read and enjoyed the posts there, my beef isn't with the writer, it's with you and this isn't the 1st time you have taken posts from other blogs for your own use. No big deal, everyone does it but don't pretend that you and your readers were searching the net playing Nancy Drew.
Anyone going to claim authorship of 9:08?
I don't even understand what that post from L.J. is about...
it's a shame that Reese doesn't get along with Vince over Vince's laid back attitude on set... heheh... Jake is not known for being all-too-serious on set either, i wonder what would it have been, if J&R actually had scenes together in Rendition. Maybe Reese would called off the whole Reeke thing.
But is is obvious to the (careful) reader that this post includes a nested quote:
The blogger says 'They were not on a date, unless those other two guys at the table were Secret Service agents. '
I knew it was Destiny, and not the blogger who had said the other two guys were Jake and Chelsea's dates.
You seem strangely disturbed by this, Laura.
What does it matter who found it and when and first? It's of interest here because it seems to support the idea that Jake was in NY with Austin.
oh... i think Laura is disturbed by many things... including the use of quotation marks.
Max: You may have known that because you read her previous comment on it, but by SK purposely leaving out that Destiny said it and not the blogger nor the eyewitness, the post is misleading. Again not a big deal, it's just a blog but what i don't get is why not just quote the post and link, why add something that was never in the original huffington post.
And i'm not strngely disturbed by anything. I was amused when i realized that "waiter" on the previous post was over at that Jake/Jake/Reese blog and found it and ought it here. They linked to the huffington site of course not the fan blog they found it on which is fine. She quoted the blogger/eyewiness but not one of the posters here.
This blog is run like the Bush Administration. Post anything and it will be taken as true. Rememeber the friends post that had to be revised because it clerly wasn't the same guy driving and they knew it.
Why do you care so much about this blog?
Hey toothless:Newsflash! There was a blog sighing of Jake meeting with a group of friends for drinks posted around the same time as this. It was a mixed group and in the group were two guys, imagine that!!Geez. You guys aren't very good in tracking down Jake. Relying on swiping stuff from other blogs and pretending you found them, what a joke.
PS: Wicked/SK: Please credit all of your sources next time, even one of your foot soldiers Destiny.
You always know when you've struck a nerve of truth. And no, this blog isn't run like the Bush Administration. We are free to discuss possibilities without fear of a clampdown, and we are not homophobic.
What the heck does "Destiny hit the nail on head" then the direct quote ... mean?
And why would you put the link to the original blog if you were trying to take to pass if off as yours.
Give me a break. This is what you have to nitpick about.
Sorry I have broken my own rule and reacted to a troll.
Please forgive me fellow OMG'ers.
Italicize for your protection OMGers
Special, I had no problem understanding what you wrote, and which source was which, and I don't think many others did either.
I know NETB -- the OMGer's are a bunch of smart cookies. : )
nobody misunderstood what you wrote, SK... that's why i had problem understanding what the trolls was on about.
but then, who understands the mentality an d motivation of the trolls anyway?
ignore is the best policy.
What I find amusing - and rather frightening - is the constant surveillance of OMG by Reeke fanatics. How could this one, little, obscure blog be so dangerous that a 24/7 watch is necessary? Why would people secure in the knowledge of the sincerity of Reeke even bother to visit, why would they leave their zone of comfort to slog around in the NCS Jake muck and mire? Why do they believe that, after all PR has thrown up - the hot Reeke romance in living, breathing, kissing, snuggling, schtupping glory - that our opinions would be changed by the snarky, smug, obvious from the first word posts of someone who is not even secure enough in their convictions about the subject?
And as to your name, Atticus should sooooo sue you for defamation of character.
Come on, criticizing OMG's post when you trolls have been posting questionable sightings all over the internet for quite some time now, that's rich.
Children of former Presidents do not get Secret Service protection after the President leaves office unless they are under the age of 16.
Wow Tom I didn't know that.
Thanks for the great information.
I wouldn't worry too much about the troll, it's only Jack, the original guy. He's not even a real 'spooner, just a 'spooner of convenience in his quest that it be anyone but Austin.
Today, the Secret Service is authorized by law to protect:
The president, the vice president, (or other individuals next in order of succession to the Office of the President), the president-elect and vice president-elect
The immediate families of the above individuals
Former presidents and their spouses for their lifetimes, except when the spouse remarries. In 1997, Congressional legislation became effective limiting Secret Service protection to former presidents for a period of not more than 10 years from the date the former president leaves office
Children of former presidents until age 16
Visiting heads of foreign states or governments and their spouses traveling with them, other distinguished foreign visitors to the United States, and official representatives of the United States performing special missions abroad
Major presidential and vice presidential candidates, and their spouses within 120 days of a general presidential election
Other individuals as designated per Executive Order of the President
National Special Security Events, when designated as such by the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
www.secretservice.gov
Spesh will do what she gotta do.
Oh yeah, it come with fries.
And I usually go for the supersize :)
it's a shame that Reese doesn't get along with Vince over Vince's laid back attitude on set... heheh... Jake is not known for being all-too-serious on set either, i wonder what would it have been, if J&R actually had scenes together in Rendition. Maybe Reese would called off the whole Reeke thing.
Winterbird, I think Reese should chill. I like that Vince tries different possibilities. She should work with David Fincher it might teach her a lesson or two (but then I doubt Fincher would want hee in one of his movies).
Remember when Jake said he admires so much RDJ because he has so many ideas about a character? Wonder what he thinks of Reese's one-take approach.
Ya know what I love about this sighting? Although there are no pictures, it's a first-hand account and definitive sighting by a reputable journalist and posted on a reputable blog. It just didn't pop up as some kind of vague sighting on a Live Journal by Johnny-on-the-Spot. Presumably, this person would have nothing to gain by writing it other than as as an opinion piece, and it's from before Jeese.
Plus I took a peek at Milos Estatoria's website and the restaurant looks fab! :)
As one who has never doubted the NY sighting, I am happy to hear more details leaking out. Just like the crutches story. Nothing stays secret forever with the internet. The Reeke crowd won't let it drop because after all the effort, they still can't get true believers. Their comments and concerns reveal that they themselves have doubts.
I'm just catching up since yesterday morning and I had no problem understanding your post, special. However, I had no idea at all what the troll was babbling about. But, as Forensic TB said above, the whole point of our troll's posts is to prove that Jake spends his time with anyone BUT Austin. I, too, love that these additional details about J&A are surfacing from that week in NYC. ITA, M, it's very simlar to the crutches sighting from last summer. :)
Wow, so much for a sleepy Saturday on OMG. Little did I know when I posted that comment late last night.....Very funny rattler.
I guess it is disturbing because the source is reputable and because it so clearly sounds like a double date and it is almost certain that it was Austin there. So Austin gets to go with Jake on double dates with his old friends, something we haven't seen with Reeke.
And Evelyn if you're lurking, running out and getting a double date in People won't work, People is not a reputable source, nor is some garage attendant. So go ahead, we all know that is what you're going to do now that we've found this sighitng of Jake
^It's great. I suppose, given what was coming, that week in NY *had* to be good :)
Nice sighting. Even if Chelsea had SS agents (it sounds like she doesn't) they wouldn't be at the table. I've eaten in a restaurant where Chelsea and her father were also lunching, and the security detail was around but not at the table.
That split photo is gorgeous, by the way ...
Destiny, "We" didn't find the sighting , it was found by one of the posters here by lurking on gyllenbabble. The post is dated on 10/18 and that's when it was posted, if you knew about it in October, it would have been posted then, not a few hours after it was posted on another fan site let's be honest for once.
How patehetic and ironic that you have to stoop to gleaming stuff that other people have found for posts here.Don't know why this didn't show up on google when posted 2 months ago but kudos to the owner of gyllenbabble for finding all things Jake eventually, they usally do.
We have no idea who was sitting with them that day but the fact that you need to bolster a sight that you claim you believe speaks volumns.
Huffington site is reputable, but your reaction indicates that you don't think that Ted and Cristina are reputible.
Chelsea doesn't have SS detail and I don't know what type of arrangements her parents set up but for some reason that week in NY Jake seem to be seen withhis BG in tow most of the time, never saw that before when he was in NY.
Imagine this site using material found by a gyllenspooner, who would have thunk it??
PS: Destiny, please stop the BS. I love how you embrace Huffington post but last month you slamed it because a writer there was speculating about Jake and Reese's Thanksgiving plans.
I know that there is no news and you are pretty steamed at the step family news this week, but you can't say that People magazine is BS and then embrace Huffington when you blasted them last month.
If those blog sightings were PR,then they would have chosen a more popular one then RAD. And don't forget, The SF chronicle reported the sighing as well.
PSS: I believe the Huffington sighting from 2 months ago as I believe the Jake and Reese and the kids sightins as well.
Wow, walked away for a few hours to rake leaves (yet again!) and all hell breaks loose! Do not engage them. I repeat, do not engage them. You all know that whenever something is posted that makes it really likely that Jake spent time with Austin, they WILL come out. Let's keep this blog for J&A fans to enjoy! Love the song choice today, BTW.
And hello Rattler, haven't heard from you in a while. :)
PS: Destiny, please stop the BS. I love how you embrace Huffington post but last month you slamed it because a writer there was speculating about Jake and Reese's Thanksgiving plans.
By the way what happened with those Turday day plans??????
I love the NYC sighting. It has just made my day. I love you Destiny.
^Turkey Day
Perhaps what-I-assume-is-PR should stop harassing people here (there seem to be two voices; the erudite one and the "Jack" troll) and instead focus on Datalounge, where someone has reported that they saw Jake dancing up a storm at a gay bar on the East Coast. Now mind you, the sighting seems to be from way, way back, but you will no doubt be swiftly there to do your own dissembling and distorting - "lies", "it was a mixed bar", "Jake's never even been in that state etc etc.".
Anyway, you have good work to do, so off you go.
The question posed: "Have you ever seen a celeb (or semi-celeb) at a gay bar or at a gay party?"
Here's your search string: "Jake G at the A-House in P-Town dancing like crazy." Now begone. You can thank me later.
Very busy Saturday for me. We're expecting a ton of snow tomorrow and all errands have to be run today!
I'll just take a couple of seconds to say that this split photo is totally dreamy. Makes you realize, if need be, what a gorgeous couple they would make at official business functions.
But wait! Is this a cigarette I see in Austin's hand? Funny, I never paid attention to this particular detail (i.e. smoking) about him. BTW, I hope Jake is still a non-smoker; I remember reading he was smoking on the set of Zodiac; although some will argue that working with Fincher is sufficient cause for a relapse, lol.
attention elsewhere: I saw that posted back in September when it was first posted, I even forwarded it to Teddy hoping he woild spin it into a BI, but he didnt bite that time unless he is saving it for later. No date, was it in September, which would be at the beginning of Rendition PR? I doubt it. Earlier this year? Last year? Oh well. P-Town/Providence/Boston.
BTW Tom Thank the owner of the gyllenbabble blog for that sighting not Destiny. And speaking of sightings, not only did you guys mis this 2 month old sighting but a post that is 3 months old on the DL!!!
Why would you be be trying to set Ted up, Trolly? You really are creepy.
I even forwarded it to Teddy hoping he woild spin it into a BI, but he didnt bite
I thought Ted got all his material from Datalounge and the internet. If so, he surely would have jumped all over that. Maybe his sources are more credible, then?
Thank the owner of the gyllenbabble blog for that sighting
Sorry, but the owner of the Gyllenbabble blog is not the only person who can find mentions of Jake on the internet.
attention elsewhere: You seem to have a short attention span: last year around October someone posted on the DL a NY sighting of Jake playing footsie with some dude with his parents present, no description given. Then a bit later that sighting was spun into a BI only this time the dude became the BF. Everyone knew where he got it: THe DL. He has admitted previously to lurking there but he was sure to thank his readers for pointing it out to him, I guess to cover his ass or to make sure he was still pointing to Jake because his readers didn't like his recent installment: The coke/producer bit. This sounded wholesome for you guys.
Setting Ted up? I don't think so. That's the price youpay for catering to his audience.
True Wicked but the gyllenbabble blog was the only Jake blog that posted it and they did it yesterday, then it shows up here. You don't expect me to believe that you both found a 2 month old sighting around the same time? I don't think so?
If Ted's sources are so reliable, why did he use a an anon. DL sighting and spin it into a BI? And it being the DL most likely BS?
At the time it was thought that it was a shoutout to his "readers" that yes TT was still Jak, sorry for the screwing the producer and coke story but if he wanted to do that, couldn't he have used something else. And him thanking his readers meant that he was well aware that the sighting was from DL and his readers did forward it to him.
It wasn't the 1st time and not the last time he has done something like that. A friend of mine that was involved in the O. Bloom fandom e-mailed him some BS about Orlando and Viggo and he spun it into a Bi and it was total BS.
The reason IMO that he didn't use the P-town story was that there was no date/time frame. The footsie under the table was a no-brainer becsuse there were pics all over the net of Jake and family in NY at that time, alsoLance, RDJ, Chris were all seen with him, so he went withit.
P-town was posted on 9/20 but it never said I saw him yesterday, last week, etc. Also methinks he was called out for doing that and exposed, I that some people forwarde that incident to other bloggers and thye siad that they weren't surprised at all.
Today is a great day. It is almost certain that the J and a sighting in NYC before "Rendition" promotion really did happen. I doubted Ted but now I believe it.
First everyopne laughed about the pants. Those pants belonged to someone taller than Jake. Plus now it looks like Jake and Chelsea were showing off the boyfriends that week also. Double dates are awesome.
Posting this really late but wanted to wish Wicked a very happy belated Birthday. Hope you have a great year :)
Tinhat, I'm sad to hear about the harrassment, and really encourage you to take action to protect yourself if the the situation escalates in any way. I knew a lesbian woman in the UK who was being harrassed by a neighbour who would do things like leave porn mags on her car. He followed up pretty small stuff with playing with her car breaks, which caused her to get into a minor accident, but could have killed her. I don't mean to scare you but its also important to assess what kind of person(s)you are dealing with. Stay safe.
Regarding the possible Jake and Austin sighting, lets hope there are more to come. Its been a long and unpleasant ride of late, and the only thing that keeps me feeling hopeful is knowing things can only get better :)
Just came back from seeing "Juno" (Go see it--a great, uplifting movie!). Anyway, what a surprise about that Jake/Chelsea sighting. And how interesting there were two guys with them (I keep thinking one of them was Jake's body guard though and the other was Chelsea's bf).
If I thought Jake was straight, I would definitely prefer Chelsea for him over the spoiled, self-entitled, obnoxious Reese. Chelsea is smart, thoughtful, admirable--and she could end up having two parents who've been President of the U.S.
Also, just posted on youtube--a trailer for you know what. Go see it before the suits descend!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9csURfer2y8
Just to say I love the photos you have in this blog. Today's is superb, it looks like they're just about to walk off hand in hand (only Austin would have to stub out his cigarette first, naughty boy).
You're doing a great job, keep it up.
Oh my, the owners of this blog never claimed they found the sighting. It was posted here last night by Waiter. And in case you didn't know, the internet is a wide open forum. Links can be re-posted anywhere. There ain't shit you or anybody else can do about it. I bet there have been links originally posted here that have been picked up and re-posted elsewhere. The reason your knickers are in such a twist is because you're so afraid Jake was with Austin.
Tinhat, you are in my thoughts. I hope you feel better
I'm glad the trolls brought up Chris today because (according to troll rules of a certain period of time of Jake not being seen with someone) I was just lamenting the breakdown of his friendship with Jake.
Take care of yourself Chris. I still love you. Maybe you can hang out with Austin
Ag I doubt very much that Jake and Chris have ended their friendship. My quess is that Chris is busy at work as is Jake. I also hope so much that Jake does not include any of his close friends or family in his attempt to be something that I believe he isnt and his romance which I believe is phony with reese. I will be devastasted if he does. I think his family and Chris would do it if he asked but hopefully he will remain above that.
Tom, you do realise I was stirring. It's just the same as Heath, Natalie P et al. I still believe he's friends with all these people even if we don't see them for a while.
It's the trolls who made up the rules of how long Jake can go without seeing someone. I just followed it.
Good to talk to you though Tom. Haven't seen you around here much lately.
I got you ag. Yeah haven't had many good things to say lately so I have been laying back a little. I have been pretty upset about what I believe Jake and reese have done the last couple of months. One thing that has helped is that there was no big Thankgiving family display and Jake has not included his family and friends in any of this so far. Except for that weird news conference where he poked fun at the rumors. I also enjoyed the little part he took in the Maroon 5 video. I believe that was a positive sign that his gay friendly days are not over. Today reading about Jakes diner with Chelsea and the two men has me believing that Teds NYC sighting may just have been on the up and up. of course we dont know who the other two guys were. Lets see what the next couple of months bring. I am hoping we can get through the holidays without too much Jeese and maybe see a light at the end of the tunnel. I told Wicked I would stay out of the conversation till after the holidays because I was so upset. But rhe last couple of days I have felt a little more positive.
I was also thrilled about what transpired with Jodie this week. I am proud of her. It took a while but things are looking good.
That first close-up shot of Health in the trailer - Holy smokes. His joker is no cartoon character or made up of smooth, easy on the eyes lines and colours. He's very raw and disturbing. In other words, brilliant. I haven't seen a Batman movie in the theatre since Tim Burton's first ( a looong time ago, lol), but I may just have to see this one.
^ Health (Health? lol) should be Heath, of course.
Hi Guys!
Glad to see you back as well, Tom.
Destiny, I agree - while we may disagree with a gossip item that was just an opinion, by a gossip writer previously affiliated with gossip mags, that doesn't negate the entire blog or their other writers.
BLTB, I just saw the trailer too - I was amazed by Heath's Joker. Love the voice, the laugh, the edginess, and the "You're Gonna Love Me". I know we are. He's definitely not one-dimensional. I haven't seen a Batman movie since Tim Burton's either, and I'm planning to see this one to enjoy Heath's Joker.
I do have some gossip about Bonnie Fuller. This comes from someone I know who works with her. The buzz is that she's basically working off her current contract and when it expires, she's going to be GONE. No joke.
Heath is seriously scary and captivating in the DK trailer. I cannot wait for this film!
Love you too Tom, and glad to see you back.
I want to clarify something I said earlier; what I really should have said is that Satran is not a pr-beholden writer, unlike, say, Bonnie Fuller of the Star.
Thanks BWF, I finally beat the suits. Even with a bad print Heath looks like he is going to be really good in Batman, if I didn't know I would never have recognized him.
[And no, your eyes are not playing tricks on you, I deleted and then reposted when I realized how many errors were in my previous post. Too much wine and not enough sleep this week.]
Wow, another melt down day. The whole premise of the internet is that news posted on a page, any page, gets relayed around the world. Who cares where it originated, it's meant to get copied and distributed. What I love about WFT and OMG both is that nothing goes unnoticed for long. Dissected, analyzed, studied. Riddles solved, enigmas uncovered. Photoshopped photos uncovered. Clues linked and confirmed. It may take a while but the job gets done.
I did check out gyllenbabble as a resut of all the discussion. Not impressed, but it does seem to be primarly focused on Jake, with Reeke talk permitted. Dont plan on going back there but had to see what it was all about.
It's called a leap of faith, anon regular troll who can't stay away. In other words we GLEAM who might be DINNING from the other information to hand. It's still speculation. Luckily everyone here knows the difference between speculation and fact :)
Sorry if you can't put your name on a post, then it gets removed.
Post a Comment