Monday, November 22, 2010

What a Pair

Everyone's asked what the hell is up with the shoes especially on the red carpet.




A shout out to Jethro Bodine?

Cletus the Slack Jaw Yokel?

Fans of the old shoe in the game Mouse Trap?

Do they have a monopoly?

Don't know but it looks like it these two are sole mates.

Maybe that's the point.


Love and Pocket Rockets World Tour

UPDATE

November 23rd, 2010


KTLA Morning Show
Date:
November 23, 2010

Time:
@ 7:45 AM Pacific Time

Channel:
KTLA (Los Angeles)



November 24th, 2010


CBS Early Show
Date:
November 24, 2010

Time:
7:00 - 9:00 AM EST

Channel:
CBS

23 comments:

Confused said...

Today is the 22nd, was Jake on the Early show on cbs?

Special K said...

Sorry that should be the 24th.

Seaweed said...

The Devil is in the Deets !!!

Shoes, Boots, Jackets, Baby talk, musical friends, chains, rings, beards, plaid shirts, long sleeve shirts, bikes and motorbikes, running, shinsplints.

We might not see them walking hand in hand, but some of this stuff is almost interwoven even if fingers are not.

Just thinking out loud...

Special K said...

We might not see them walking hand in hand, but some of this stuff is almost interwoven even if fingers are not.

Perfectly said Seaweed.

Ego much said...

He's so full of himself in that picture of him walking up the steps. I wish someone would take him down a peg or two.

Special K said...

Here's a hysterical interview Jake and Anne did with MTV. They talk about Glee, Teen Wolf, Jake imitates the interviewer and blames his behavior on having a cupcake earlier.

MTV

Special K said...

Don't really understand how you can get Jake being full of himself from a picture of him walking up the stairs with smile.

How dare he! said...

"He's so full of himself in that picture of him walking up the steps. I wish someone would take him down a peg or two."

Walking up stairs and smiling at his own movie premiere! God what an a*shole!

dlisted said...

Michael K's description of Source Code

Jakey Gyllenhaal explodes over and over again in his new movie. Take your fingers off your nips, I didn't mean it like that

prairiegirl said...

I never said I was leaving.

I said I was taking a sabbatical.

And I said when I came back, you would know.


Boy, for someone who keeps everything we say on file and external hard drive, you sure didn't pull up the correct recalled information on that one.

prairiegirl said...

No matter if one disagrees with the comment about Jake walking up the stairs, there's no need to bring the A-word to this day's comments.

Everything was going along just fine until that unnecessary comment - and I'm talking about the one with the A-word in it.

Jersey Tom said...

I think Jake looks fine in both pictures. He doesn't look smug. Those two sure could use some new shoes.


I have been waiting for some comments from Austin about one particular event. I will be floored if he mentions it in his tweets.

Jake's friend Natalie Portman is now the odds on favorite to win win the Best Actress Oscar.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Confused said...

What are your opinons, if any, of Anne's comments about Jake giving too much? She says she worries about him??? They seemed to have become close during LAOD, which I think is good. She seems to be a loyal friend, as a fellow Scorpio, I know she will fight for her friend.

the real m said...

Ah yes, the devil is in the details. And Jake is known for visual signals. Remember SNL. He also says volumes by what he does not say as well as what he does say. It must be exhausting to keep up all that effort to stay closeted.

2 more days to go. the RT score just gets lower. Not sure when the critic moratorium will be lifted, but I hope the low scores are just a factor of the number of reviews and not a true indication of how they feel about the film. It had such promise.

Defamer/Gawker comments today about the Source Code trailer were surprisingly negative. I thought it looked pretty good.

wiki said...

I never said I was leaving.

I said I was taking a sabbatical.

And I said when I came back, you would know.


Sabbatical or a sabbatical (from Latin sabbaticus, from Greek sabbatikos, from Hebrew shabbat, i.e., Sabbath, literally a "ceasing") is a rest from work, or a hiatus, often lasting from two months to a year. The concept of sabbatical has a source in shmita, described several places in the Bible (Leviticus 25, for example, where there is a commandment to desist from working the fields in the seventh year). In the strict sense, therefore, sabbatical lasts a year.

boobyann said...

Everything was going along just fine until that unnecessary comment - and I'm talking about the one with the A-word in it..

21:04 Still telling people what they can and can't say. Please return to your sabbatical (the 12 month version preferably)

Special K said...

Tweet this morning from KTLA in LA about Jake.

Heads up West Coast.

KTLAmorningnews: Actor Jake Gyllenhaal joins us live at 7:45 to talk about "Love & Other Drugs"...you won't want to miss his chat with @samontv
14 minutes ago via TweetDeck

KTLA MorningNews

That's 7:45 Pacific time, (10:45AM EST)

tv said...

KTLA is an affiliate of The CW

Special K said...

Jake was supposed to be on Good Day LA the Fox affiliate, but Jillian Barberie just tweeted he canceled.

AskJillian
Jake Gyllenhaal cancelled. Sometimes I think it's cuz Rey do t like the show. Who knows!! Nancy O'Dell coming up
8 minutes ago via Echofon

the real m said...

Unfortunately it appears that the one who needs a sabbatical is Jake based on the critic's reviews starting to show up on RT. I expected them to be mixed but not near as negative as they are.

I came on too late to catch that radio interview but assume it will show up on IHJ before the end of the day.

tv said...

All the interviews were canceled this morning: KTLA and Good Day LA and the Fox affiliate in IN, it was all live via satelite, I assume from NY. He has an appearence tomorrow on This Morning on CBS in NY unless that is taped he may cancel that as well if he still isn't feeling well.

Stubborn TB said...

If we're going to use Rotten Tomatoes as an indication, then why not use all of the information?

It has a 83% rating of the audience wanting to see it.
Why is that not mentioned? Cause it's not negative enough?

There are so far 18 reviews, basic math shows that the smaller the total number is, the more influence one of the reviews has in changing the overall percentages. A whooping number of 12 people have so far given it a negative review, for gods sake!
Why not just wait until people actually are able to see the movie and then make your judgement call? I don't think it's going to boot Harry Potter from #1, but I don't think it's the big flop people seem to be hoping for as some sort of punishment for the whole Taylor thing - which still hasn't materialized, btw.

Now I'll go back to being... what was it this time? Robot? I hope I can remember that: less "baaah", more "beep, beep, beep".