Saturday, June 1, 2013

Looking at Loki



From the new trailer for Prisoners we got a little bit more of a look at Detective Loki







Interesting interviewing technique there 





 One question Detective is that a ring or a lug nut on your finger?




70 comments:

prairiegirl said...

You know, you watch patterns online long enough when it comes to both of these guys and you develop a sixth sense sometimes when it comes to noticing when mgmt is reacting to something.

So out of the blue this past weekend, it was noticed a resurgence of fake DM/twitter "convo's" allegedly between Austin and some of his OTH fangirl followers. **eye roll**

The activity has been on Austin's cyber side because Jake's online activity has been taken care of due to the release of the Prisoners trailer. It's pretty much been a free ride for his team since the holiday - I'm sure the timing of the release of the first picture and then the movie trailer of Prisoners helped to ensure a solid EKG line as far as his online pulse.

So why would Austin's twitter activity suddenly have this resurrection of the ultra personalized conversations with young female followers?

Perhaps the following tweet from Friday the 31st influenced the embellished activity. It's possible.

Twitter said...

Deven (@DevenGrey)
5/31/13, 13:45

@DevenGrey: is my mum for real?! ���� just chilling with Jake Gyllenhaal !! #sojealous #takemetoLA Just the DM

When prompted for perhaps additional details, the tweeter added this:


Deven ‏@DevenGrey 31 May

@Jacktwistt apparently he's heading to universal studios and his niece liked my moms shoes! haha! ��✨ #nothingjuicy #nogossip !
5:07 PM - 31 May 13 · Details

Jersey Tom said...

Prisoners is Hugh's movie. I think The Enemy will be Jake's turn to shine. Got a good feeling about it.

prairiegirl said...

I will say I find it kind of odd that Jake would spill where he was going but we don't know who the mother is, what she does for a living and then there's the little matter of the mention of his "niece", lol.

This niece mention is what caught my eye and the disclosure that she was fascinated/liked the woman's shoes. So then you look at where Maggie and the girls were around this time. There were several sightings of her in Brooklyn at this time.

Chris Clark ‏@chrisclark93 26 May

Just stood in line for food with Maggie Gyllenhaal at Smorgasburg. She's beautiful. #ILoveNewYork @… atSmorgasburg

1:10 PM - 26 May 13 from New York, NY · Details


yoyo ‏@joanna_paps 30 May

Saw Maggie Gyllenhaal in Brooklyn today
3:50 PM - 30 May 13 · Details




Ann Ajana ‏@AnnAjana2 31 May

Maggie Gyllenhaal playing paddycake on my subway this morning with her daughter-everyone knows her but no one bothers them-NYC is so cool
8:31 AM - 31 May 13 · Details


There are other tweets but it's not necessary to post all. These tweets confirm Maggie and the girls in Brooklyn so then the question would be who was the "niece" who was with Jake on Friday?

prairiegirl said...

When I saw that the Niece Tweet was published on Friday the 31st mid-day, then the ensuing nonsense on Austin's twitter feed over the weekend became self-explanatory.

Management was reacting to a slip that got out.

It's a shame to see this happen to Austin's account again these past several days because what it does is it just encourages an "embellished" environment for other participants to join in the fray. It's so unbelievably obvious.



Maggie beautiful life said...

Maggie has two girls and all the Maggie has has solo except the one with one of her daughters. As a mother I know that you no longer play pattycake with a six year old do I doubt that was Ramona who must be six by now so that had to be Grace ..
Ramona is big enough to travel to L.A witj his Uncle if the sighting is legit. Busibess at Universal and a visit with Grandpa and stepgrandma? Odd that's the only L.A. sighting sincw there have been several in N Y and even one in Fl. LOL!

evil pr said...

Lol! Jake would'nt be wandering around Universal studios with Ramona or Grace if he didn't want to be seen or noticed. Most likely it was someone that looked like him and they eithet they assumed that was his niece since they probably read that he has two.
One in L. A. One in Fl. and several in NY all at the same time, it must be his clones! Austin is DMing fans because he wants them to watch the show on Showtime

Methodical Muser said...

The name is Gloria not Grace. And, I thought Jake was supposed to be in NY? Funny how when he inexplicably pops up in Los Angeles with a little girl, the explanation is that he must be with Ramona. But, then again, that's how it works. The same thing happened when a Day Care Worker in Pittsburg said that Jake Gyllenhaal had brought in his daughter in 2009. Immediately, someone comes on the blog and argues that she must have made a mistake. It had to have been Ramona.

If you look at that photo of Maggie at the food counter, she's looking down at that little girl who is coincidentally the same height, with a similar brunette haircut, as Ramona. Plus, the school year extends into June in New York so no way would Jake be flying Ramona across the country by himself when she would have had to be back at school on Monday. Never mind the fact that May 31 was a Friday, i.e. a school day.

prairiegirl said...

All of those DM's are not from him, you can tell they're not. Some are certainly legit looking. But Austin is not going to sit around conversing back and forth with one particular fan, peppering his DM's with all kinds of girlfriend exclamation points. That's for a 2nd grader to believe.

Methodical Muser said...

A little stroll down memory lane:

Don't forget when Jake was interviewed on Regis and Kelly in 2010 and said that Maggie had a niece. He then corrected himself by stating that he had a niece. But the slip up was obvious.

There was also a tweet at the Getty Center in February 2010, and the guy stated that Jake was there with his kid.

Also, when Jake returned from Montreal after filming Source Code on April 22, the very next morning he was seen at breakfast with a couple and described as having fun with a little girl.

Never mind this comment left at The Film Experience website in January, 2012, “I think Jake Gyllenhaal and his lover Austin Nichols should continue to focus on their new daughter, as they have been doing. He is extremely talented, and a year or two hiatus will not diminish him whatsoever. He is a respected actor for a reason (because he is exceptional, should anyone need reminding). I look forward to his acting choices in future. I would not dare giving [sic] him advice, especially in areas where I am not qualified.”

Then there was that "large portion" of the evening at the Sundance Film Festival recently, where Jake kept cradling and playing with a baby that was "rolling" with the group.

heads up said...

Don't know if anyone noticed, but the moment the subject of Jake being in LA with a little girl started being discussed here, I "kid" you not, (Ha!) a bunch of tweets have suddenly appeared placing Jake in NY and NJ. I know you guys have stated that this is a common reaction whenever Jake is seen somewhere he's not supposed to be, but Twitter literally had been dead in terms of Jake spottings until your discussion started this morning.

fact checking said...

If you look at the date of the photo May 26 and the sighting of Jake (always if it is true and we know Jake is not that chatty ) of 31 May can be safely Ramona

Methodical Muser said...

Not if Ramona is supposed to be in school. Jake is indeed not a chatty man when it comes to untrustworthy strangers, but he is a liar. If the woman asked him who the little girl was, it's automatic for him to say that it's his niece. He's been doing it for years.

destiny said...

No way Jake is going to travel to LA with Ramona like that, not a 6 year-old, and with school still in session in NYC.

fact checking said...

pay attention "chilling with Jake Gyllenhaal" "he's heading to universal studios and his niece liked my moms shoes"

this means that they have nicely talked and that Jake has been chatty e friendly
all this with his super secret "daughter"??!!

fact checking said...

No way Jake is going to travel to LA with Ramona like that, not a 6 year-old, and with school still in session in NYC.

just chilling with Jake Gyllenhaal !! #sojealous #takemetoLA

5:07 PM - 31 May Friday
no school until Monday

New York said...

♕ κατεΙγη ♕ ‏@katelyntighe

WE JUST SAW JAKE GYLLENHAAL pic.twitter.com/4rJlCpZGD0

12:09 PM - June 2 New York

Methodical Muser said...

No that would be wrong. School would be in session on Friday too. If they had breakfast, which is what the tweeter states, that means they flew into LA on Thursday, at the very least. Memorial Day was May 27th, that was the school holiday. School resumed on May 28th. Never mind that Jake is not going to be traveling to LA with his niece, the point Destiny just made.

this means that they have nicely talked and that Jake has been chatty e friendlyall this with his super secret "daughter"??!!

Doesn't seem far-fetched to me. He is in a public place. Of course, he's going to act as unassuming as possible. Drawing attention to himself would not be too smart. And, I doubt that he was chatty. But, when the little girl started paying attention to the mother's shoes, I'm sure Jake was engaging and encouraging of the child's curiosity. I have little doubt that he is an attentive and loving father.

I agree said...

♕ κατεΙγη ♕ ‏@katelyntighe

WE JUST SAW JAKE GYLLENHAAL pic.twitter.com/4rJlCpZGD0


I think you are intentionally missing the point that was made and that is these sudden NY sightings are exactly that. Sudden. All of them coming after OMG's discussion of Jake in LA. Like "heads up" indicated earlier, Twitter literally had been dead in terms of Jake spottings until the OMG discussion started this morning.

Methodical Muser said...


And,now PR is scrambling because they know the next question will be, "Where's Peter?" Why is he not being seen with Maggie and the kids? Why isn't he with Ramona? Why would an uncle be with his daughter, instead of the father? Well, they decided to do a preemptive strike this time and post a miraculous sighting of Peter in British Columbia (you know isolated, bear country). And, of course, they provide the perfect answer. Which is that he is working. How convenient. Funny though, weeks go by with absolutely nothing on Sarsgaard and then out of nowhere comes a Canadian sighting that also explains why he's not with Maggie and the kids.

Devyn Donald Devyn Donald ‏@DevynDonald
Peter Sarsgaard just came through the office at work and I'm freaking out
12:02 PM - 2 Jun 13

Beautiful Maggie said...

Twitter wasnt dead you just ignore Jake in NY tweets which they were before the L A sighting including one with an icky girl.

No need to clutch your pearls I doubt that was Jake in L A. Ramona didn't miss a precious day of grade school. Loving father my ass!

If Jake was actually at Universal there would be more than one tweet.

prairiegirl said...

Unlike who exactly 17:48? We are employed. Full time.

That has got to be one of the lamest, most inaccurate and desperate proclamations ever uttered on this blog.

Methodical Muser said...

Twitter wasnt dead you just ignore Jake in NY tweets which they were before the L A sighting including one with an icky girl.

So you don't like women? That's too bad because if you weren't such a homophobe you would realize that gay men do like women. If you actually read the thread of the Deven conversation, you would have seen that she interacted with other Jake fans, and it was pretty clear that the LA breakfast was an undeniable, positive sighting. Her mother knew who Jake Gyllenhaal was.

fact checking said...

pay attention Just had breakfast in CLUBLOUNGE (this means that they were still in the airport)11:45 AM friday morning

Never mind that Jake is not going to be traveling to LA with his niece, the point Destiny just made.
?????

WHY?


Methodical Muser said...

If Jake was actually at Universal there would be more than one tweet.

Depends where Jake went.

Methodical Muser said...

Never mind that Jake is not going to be traveling to LA with his niece, the point Destiny just made.

That's right. He was with his daughter.

? said...

what would the big deal in miss a day of school??
LOL!

heads up said...

I'm more likely to believe Jake being in Los Angeles with his daughter than with Ramona because there is absolutely no reason for Jake to be traveling to California with his niece. Especially, when she's supposed to be in school. And, by the way, I hate to tell you, but CLUBLOUNGE does not automatically mean the airport. Although it could, but that fact doesn't disprove anything that's been said. Maggie takes her children with her, even to Ireland. No reason for Jake to fly 3,000 miles with Ramona on their own just to go to Universal Studios. You really are being ridiculous now.

Methodical Muser said...

what would the big deal in miss a day of school??

To go visit Universal Studios? LOLLLLLLL! You do know that Ramona has probably seen this "landmark", many times over? Maggie and Peter used to have a home in Venice. Ramona is not a tourist.

wonderland said...

That's right. He was with his daughter.

Sure just next to the magical unicorns and chocolate fountain!

Methodical Muser said...

That's right. He was with his daughter.

Hate to tell you, but he probably has more than one.

blasto said...

Funny I follwed the conversation and ther was no mention of her mother meeting other Jake fans . Please post that part

prairiegirl said...

Desperation rears its head when totally false and straw grasping personal proclamations are used instead of logic to make a valid argument.

The thing is when have we had past evidence of Ramona traveling long distances alone with Uncle Jake?

Real world said...

LOLLLLLLL! what?????

hallooo her grandfather lives in LA!

jkblastotwistt said...

Please stop we all know that one of the omg posters has struck again!

Starstruck Fan said...

Why is someone calling Maggie, beautiful? I mean, what does that have to do with what's being discussed anyway. That's all kinds of strange and really shows that person is not exactly objective.

blastotwistt said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Beautiful Maggie said...

Maggie is beautiful as is her family

Reality said...

Hate to tell you, but he probably has more than one.

forgive me if I'm a little skeptical about your theories-that so many have been proven wrong too many times or so wrong such as Jake stopped working to be closer to his family



Starstruck Fan said...

So what if Stephen Gyllenhaal lives in California. No one knows where he is right now. But, even if he is in LA, why wouldn't "Beautiful" Maggie take her own daughter to visit Grandpa? She's just hangin' in Brooklyn, after all.

Special K said...

I agree there would be no reason for Jake to have Ramona with him in CA. Like others have said school is still in session here on the East Coast, with school not letting out until the 2nd or 3rd week of June.

And a six yr old would not be as fascinated with shoes as a much smaller child. A six yr old has a much broader sense of attention. Now a younger child, toddler age would be more fascinated by something closer to their eye level or area of attention. Especially if they were unique or colorful.

Special K said...

Very interesting about the timing of the tweets. And honestly it has been dead dead dead about Jake all weekend until there is speculation about Jake in CA with his "niece"

And now all this traffic on OMG and trolls coming out of the walls. That's no coincidence either.

You think OMG hasn't been right on target on things. Think again. People wouldn't be acting like this if we've always been wrong.

obvious said...

but CLUBLOUNGE does not automatically mean the airport.


that woman was flying to los angeles course in this case CLUBLOUNGE means-airport
DHU!

prairiegirl said...

#1, I don't jump when you snap your fingers, Jack.

#2? BWAHHH! You think that account which talked to the girl was created by myself? That is precious. Nope, sorry to pop that little lightbulb. lol.

wow.

Methodical Muser said...

forgive me if I'm a little skeptical about your theories-that so many have been proven wrong too many times or so wrong such as Jake stopped working to be closer to his family

No need to forgive someone who is making a series of statements that are patently untrue. And, check your facts. Jake did stop working for long periods of time after 2009. This was a complete turnaround from his nonstop acting up through Brokeback Mountain. There are two prominent examples of long periods when Jake was not working on a film after his separation from Reeke, which no longer was there to provide him cover for his family planning.

Btw: Jake is working now, because he is no longer having children:

April 22, 2010-June 2011 (approx. 14 months)
September 2011-May 2012 (approx. 8 months)

lose lose said...

Wait a minute! If this sighting is true then it means that Jake was not in California with Austin for Memorial day! ooooh too Bad

Methodical Muser said...

such as Jake stopped working to be closer to his family

Jake did not stop working to be closer to his family. He stopped working to compete his family.

not really said...

Wait a minute! If this sighting is true then it means that Jake was not in California with Austin for Memorial day! ooooh too Bad

Why? Were you with Austin on Memorial Day?

Beautiful Maggie examining that Fl. photo said...

But neither Jake nor Austin have stopped working mm.

Methodical Muser said...

But neither Jake nor Austin have stopped working mm.

I'm so glad you brought up Austin because if you noticed, after Reeke, Austin was on OTH and Jake was the one who was not taking film roles so he had a much more flexible time schedule. When OTH ended at the end of 2011, Jake continued to take some time off from movie making to be with Austin and their family (e.g. London, Berlin, etc.) and it wasn't until May, 2012 that Jake started filming again.

Not an expert, but said...

I'm not an Austin expert, but even I know that the projects he takes often don't require that many days of actual filming. Wasn't Laugh Out Loud like 2-3 days in Detroit?

the other side of the moon said...

Your analysis of the facts are always partial and lacking basic facts and subtle problem---as the failures of Jake at the Box office that obviously have caused problems in being chosen in new important roles and forced him to rethink his career and change agency
of course you think the change of agency was the final step to be with Austin and family in the light of the sun
another of your theories turned out to be completely wrong

Methodical Muser said...

But neither Jake nor Austin have stopped working mm.

It's not a matter of stopping work. It's the kind of projects they take. My point about Jake not working had to do with film roles. He stayed in the public eye with short term commitments like movie promotions (LaOD, Source Code), the one week Revival ride, the Bear Grylls special, charity work like Edible Schoolyard, etc., but never anything long term. Why? Because Austin was working on OTH and Jake needed to coordinate his schedule around Austin's.

Methodical Muser said...

Your analysis of the facts are always partial and lacking basic facts and subtle problem---as the failures of Jake at the Box office that obviously have caused problems in being chosen in new important roles and forced him to rethink his career and change agency
of course you think the change of agency was the final step to be with Austin and family in the light of the sun another of your theories turned out to be completely wrong


Don't change the topic. My analysis is neither subtle, nor without facts. Unlike yours, I might add. I'm looking at your last statement, for instance, and your assertion that Jake took time off to rethink his career doesn't hold up to the actual timeline. Jake stopped making films the moment Reeke ended. Remember, he was already committed to do Source Code while still under the bearding contract with Reeke. After Reeke, Jake did not take another movie role until End of Watch. No doubt there was a lot of press to keep Jake's name in the news and seemingly relevant (like the Taylor Swift fauxmance), but no actual movie commitments.

By the way, May 2010 was when the Family Truckster appeared too. Without Reese's family autos available to Jake, he had to bite the bullet and obtain not one, but two Audi Q7s. Expanding families need room to travel.

simple as that said...

Why? Were you with Austin on Memorial Day?

no but the father of this girl was

Giana Elenterio ‏@gi_on_ya

So my dad sent me this picture from his trip to Cali a couple days ago. That's my dad buddies up w/ @AUS10NICHOLS �� pic.twitter.com/J0fZWRK2GU

as shown by the photographic evidence Austin was in California for Memorial Day and if the sighting at the airport, it is true as people here believe, jake was not, ergo they were not together for Memorial day

Methodical Muser said...

Trip to Cali. Oh yes, I saw that one. How do you know Jake wasn't with them? Jake is very outdoorsy, after all. Also, couples don't do everything together even though they may be in the same city. Someone has to cook dinner you know! :-)

Methodical Muser said...

Time to end this lovely chat. I work for a living you know.

short memory said...

Jake stopped making films the moment Reeke ended.

Hallooo because PoP and LAOD bombed BIG TIME!

Options said...

I don't see why it has to be either Ramona or Jake's "daughter" that was referred to in the tweet. Jake probably has lots of friends (that aren't famous) with kids and maybe it was one of them.

Gotta say that it would be pretty troubling to tell someone that your own child was your "niece" especially in the child's presence. Yikes. Talk about setting a child up for therapy.

Special K said...

But do we know if Jake said it was his niece or the person assumed it was his niece because he is seen as a bachelor in the media?

prairiegirl said...

That is true, Special, that point is not clear.

You all were practcally giddy when you thought they were kaput.


Uh, there's still quite a bit of cloudiness in that test tube, so I wouldn't be closing the book on that one. At least not as far as I'm concerned.

Besides, what's it to you, keeper of the Gyllengate?

Options said...

But do we know if Jake said it was his niece or the person assumed it was his niece because he is seen as a bachelor in the media?

No, we don't *know* anything for sure. Everyone is speculating - including those who believe Jake was with his daughter - and I'm just throwing out another option that it wasn't necessarily his daughter or one of Maggie's girls.

prairiegirl said...

I don't see why it has to be either Ramona or Jake's "daughter" that was referred to in the tweet. Jake probably has lots of friends (that aren't famous) with kids and maybe it was one of them.


The odds of the girl being the daughter of a friend are so low that I wouldn't even place a quarter on that bet.

The thing to remember about this whole tweet situation is that when you study the account and its recent tweet history, it seems to me that the daughter is back home in the UK. For whatever reason, the mother is in the States for a visit.
So for the daughter to tell the Jake fan tweeter during their twitter conversation about "his niece" would seem to indicate to me that either her mother specifically quoted what she was told or else the mother knew that perhaps Jake had a niece and therefore made her own assumption that it was Jake's niece.
The daughter was not there. She posted the DM that her mother sent her and then gave the additional information about the encounter.

prairiegirl said...

Ha! Here's a funny after all, one must explore all options.

Could there be an outside shot that it was one of their little boys and the guys haven't given him his first haircut and the mother mistook him for a little girl.

lol. Just covering all the possibilities. Jake, please don't pass along your recent long hair trends along to the boys.


I'm kidding, just kidding.

Options said...

The odds of the girl being the daughter of a friend are so low that I wouldn't even place a quarter on that bet.

I'm not understanding why it is so "out there" to think that this mother could have assumed this was Jake's niece. Special K herself said and you agreed that the person may have been making an assumption.

So for the daughter to tell the Jake fan tweeter during their twitter conversation about "his niece" would seem to indicate to me that either her mother specifically quoted what she was told or else the mother knew that perhaps Jake had a niece and therefore made her own assumption that it was Jake's niece.

How does this make my speculation any less believable? If the mother knows Jake has a niece and is making an assumption based on that then she could be assuming a friend's child could be a niece as easily as she could assume Jake's "daughter" could be a niece.

Serious question and I'm not being sarcastic - if you truly believe this was Jake's daughter and he had her out in public, what do you think she calls him? Do you think she calls him "Dad" or "Daddy" or "Papa"? How would you stop a child that age from calling you that in public? I mean, if they are going to these incredible lengths to hide this child (children), this seems really risky. Kids are unpredictable.

prairiegirl said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kodak moment said...

If people are expecting some of us to have all the answers, I'll tell you right now that we don't.

I'm not expecting anything, especially answers about these "Assumed Children". Beleive what you want, it's a free world, but why on earth would Jake take his hidden child out in public? You know, the one he's hiding from the world and all of HW and the OMGers. Hey, why not bring the rest of the brood out? Who knows if this twitter account /tweet is real, legit? There are no pictures of Jake and a child nowhere on the net or tabloids. When I see a child or he and Austin saying, this is my child/these are my children, I'll beleive it. Until then this twitter tweet of Jake and a child is total BS! Show me a picture!

One more thing, funny how when dedicated Jake and Austin has 5+ children regulars posters get some little light that things are leaning in their fatasy direction, they act as if Jake and Austin took a picture of the 5+ Cartoon Network kids and said to the world. Look at my family and kids. Newsflash: Jake and Austin has said just the opposite and nobody on this site has seen an acutual child with Jake or Austin.

Special K said...

Jake has been seen with kids several times that people assume are his nieces but oddly it doesn't seem it is.

Let's see there was Jake at the Getty museum. And then there was Jake at the Pirate ship in the park in London and not one sight of Ramona. And the movie theater in Canada with the little child right in front of him. Then there were the sighting of Jake pushing a baby carriage in Brooklyn BEFORE Gloria was born. Oh and then there was Jake seen at a little girl up on the Upper West Side restaurant/play space that caters to kids.Oh and the person that said he had a child in daycare when he was filming LaOD in Pittsburgh.

prairiegirl said...

Okay, see you just showed your true colors right there.

Get out of here. Trying to act like you're being respectful and serious.

Get you people talking long enough and it always comes out.

I erase my answers to you.

prairiegirl said...

Special, they're not worth it.